Effects of long term application of compost and poultry manure on soil quality of citrus orchards in Southern Italy.

A six-year study was carried out in an organically managed orange orchard located in Sicily (Southern Italy) to assess the effect of compost and organic fertilizers utilisation on soil quality. Adopting a randomized-block experimental design with three replicates, four treatments were carried out. In treatments 1 and 2, two different composts (C1 from distillery by products and C2 from livestock wastes) were applied. The plots of treatment 3 were fertilized using dried poultry manure. The control treatment was fertilized with mineral/synthetic fertilizers. In order to verify the hypothesis that composts and organic fertilizers improve soil fertility, soil quality was evaluated by selecting dynamic soil parameters, as indicators linked to C and N cycles. Total organic C, total N, C/N ratio, humified fraction, isoelectric focusing (IEF) of extracted organic matter, microbial biomass C, potentially mineralisable N under anaerobic conditions, potenzially mineralizable C, C mineralization quotient and metabolic quotient were determined for each sample. Furthermore, the Comunity level Physiological Profile (by Biolog tecnique) was defined, calculating derived functional biodiversity and versatility indexes. Parameters related to IEF and potentially mineralizable C showed significant differences among the treatments. Moreover, total C, total N and humification parameters tended to increase, while no differences were observed in biodiversity indexes. On these findings, it was concluded that composts and poultry manure only weakly affected soil properties, though they increased soil nutritive elements potentially available to crops

Modern trends of Citrus pruning in Italy

The citrus industry is at present increasingly oriented toward upgrading groves, discarding obsolete plantings and introducing new rootstock/scion combinations which are more tailored to local environmental conditions. A rise in production costs (but without a proportionate increase in profit) together with technological innovation have both led to many changes in citrus orchard management, and consequently there have been changes in cultural techniques. Many cultural and edaphic factors influence the choice of pruning frequency and intensity. The main goal of pruning is to reach a useful balance between yield and growth, and to reduce cultivation costs. Drastic pruning in young citrus trees with a vigorous vegetative habit causes an excess of shoot growth, thereby extending the juvenile stage and delaying fruiting. Adaptation of the technique to local conditions in bearing groves (species, cultivars, planting distances, etc.) is mandatory for pruning optimization. A fully mechanised approach to pruning leads to substantial changes in citrus grove management and sometimes to negative effects on yield. Functional integration of mechanical and assisted pruning seems to be the right choice for the Italian citrus industry

¿Es posible mejorar la eficiencia en el uso del agua de un viñedo mediante un acolchado orgánico del suelo?

El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto que un acolchado orgánico del suelo (restos de poda) puede tener sobre la evapotranspiración del cultivo (ETc) de la vid con el fin de mejorar la eficiencia en el uso del agua. El estudio se realizó durante la campaña de 2015 en la finca “Las Tiesas”, Albacete (España). Las medidas se llevaron a cabo en un lisímetro monolítico de pesada ubicado en el centro de una parcela de vid (Vitis vinífera L., cv. Tempranillo) de 1 ha de superficie, y con cepas plantadas a un marco de 3 x 1,5 m y conducción en espaldera. Se llevaron a cabo tres ciclos de medidas, cada uno consistió en mantener el suelo desnudo durante los dos primeros días, los dos siguientes se cubrió la superficie del lisímetro con un acolchado orgánico (restos de poda de la vid) y los dos últimos días se cubrió el lisímetro con un acolchado inorgánico (lona de plástico). Los resultados indican que para la misma demanda evaporativa y fracción de cubierta vegetal, el acolchado orgánico redujo la ETc de la vid algo más de un 17%, mientras que el plástico la redujo un 25%. Los resultados obtenidos indican que con el acolchado orgánico sigue produciéndose una cierta evaporación de agua desde el suelo, pero se reduce considerablemente la ETc pudiéndose mejorar la eficiencia en el uso del agua.Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad FEDER AGL2014-54201-C4-4- RRTA 2011-00100-C05-04RTA 2014-00049-C05-0

Respuesta del granado ‘Mollar’ a la fertilización N-P-K bajo distintos regímenes de riego deficitario controlado

Son escasos los estudios realizados sobre las prácticas agronómicas y su relación con la producción, alteraciones fisiológicas y composición físico-química del fruto en el granado. En las zonas de clima semiárido, en las que se cultiva principalmente el granado en España, el manejo de la nutrición y el riego son factores determinantes de la calidad del fruto. Asimismo, la relación entre el estado hídrico y nutricional de la planta son factores cruciales de la producción que pueden afectar a dos de las fisiopatías más importantes que afectan a la granada, el golpe de sol y el rajado. En este trabajo se pretende analizar la respuesta productiva del granado ‘Mollar’ a tres estrategias de riego con dos dosis de abonado N-P-K, estudiando las funciones que relacionan la eficiencia en el uso del agua (EUA) y la producción con el agua y abono recibidos por el cultivo. El trabajo experimental se realizó durante las campañas 2014 y 2015 en una parcela comercial situada en Aspe (Alicante). Respecto a la fertilización, los tratamientos fueron 1) 100% y 2) 50% de la dosis anual recomendada en la zona de estudio de (170)N, (100)P2O5 y (205)K2O kg.ha-1; combinados con tres estrategias de riego 1) Control, regado al 100% de las necesidades hídricas estimadas del cultivo (ETc), 2) Riego deficitario controlado RDCflo con severas restricciones (riego del 25% del Control) durante el periodo de floración-cuajado y 3)RDCmad, en las que la restricción severa (riego del 25% respecto al Control) se aplicó durante la última fase de desarrollo del fruto y la maduración. Las estrategias de riego y fertilización mostraron efectos de interacción significativa en la producción por árbol, peso medio del fruto y porcentaje de frutos con daños por rajado. Resultados preliminares parecen demostrar que la aplicación de la dosis menor de fertilización no tiene efectos negativos significativos en los aspectos productivos estudiados. El empleo del RDIflo mejoró la eficiencia productiva por árbol y redujo la afección por rajado

Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: tackling the issue from the roots

Viticulture is facing emerging challenges not only because of the effect of climate change on yield and composition of grapes, but also of a social demand for environmental‐friendly agricultural management. Adaptation to these challenges is essential to guarantee the sustainability of viticulture. The aim of this review is to present adaptation possibilities from the soil‐hidden, and often disregarded, part of the grapevine, the roots. The complexity of soil–root interactions makes necessary a comprehensive approach taking into account physiology, pathology and genetics, in order to outline strategies to improve viticulture adaptation to current and future threats. Rootstocks are the link between soil and scion in grafted crops, and they have played an essential role in viticulture since the introduction of phylloxera into Europe at the end of the 19th century. This review outlines current and future challenges that are threatening the sustainability of the wine sector and the relevant role that rootstocks can play to face these threats. We describe how rootstocks along with soil management can be exploited as an essential tool to deal with the effects of climate change and of emerging soil‐borne pests and pathogens. Moreover, we discuss the possibilities and limitations of diverse genetic strategies for rootstock breeding.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Quantitative analysis of almond yield response to irrigation regimes in Mediterranean Spain

Almond plantations are expanding worldwide, specifically in Spain; the new orchards are often designed under more intensive systems in comparison to the traditional rainfed orchards frequently found in the Mediterranean Sea basin. In these new areas, water is the main limiting factor, and therefore, the present research is aimed at quantitatively analyzing previous findings obtained in irrigation field trials carried out in Spain with mature almond trees. The goal was to derive applied water-production functions and compare sustained and regulated deficit irrigation strategies to provide robust information on the marginal water productivity and the preferred irrigation option to be applied under water scarcity conditions. This quantitative analysis reported a yield increase as water application increased, with the highest potential yield of about 2500 kg/ha achieved with around 1000 mm of irrigation water applied. Under severe water restrictions, similar responses were observed regardless of the deficit irrigation technique employed. In contrast, under moderate water stress, it seems more advantageous to apply a regulated deficit irrigation strategy rather than a sustained deficit strategy. The reported results are useful for deriving more sustainable irrigation protocols and highlight the need to optimize other inputs in addition to water to take full advantage of the irrigation intensification to be carried out in the new almond plantations.Publishe

Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: tackling the issue from the roots

[EN] Viticulture is facing emerging challenges not only because of the effect of climate change on yield and composition of grapes, but also of a social demand for environmental-friendly agricultural management. Adaptation to these challenges is essential to guarantee the sustainability of viticulture. The aim of this review is to present adaptation possibilities from the soil-hidden, and often disregarded, part of the grapevine, the roots. The complexity of soil-root interactions makes necessary a comprehensive approach taking into account physiology, pathology and genetics, in order to outline strategies to improve viticulture adaptation to current and future threats. Rootstocks are the link between soil and scion in grafted crops, and they have played an essential role in viticulture since the introduction of phylloxera into Europe at the end of the 19th century. This review outlines current and future challenges that are threatening the sustainability of the wine sector and the relevant role that rootstocks can play to face these threats. We describe how rootstocks along with soil management can be exploited as an essential tool to deal with the effects of climate change and of emerging soil-borne pests and pathogens. Moreover, we discuss the possibilities and limitations of diverse genetic strategies for rootstock breeding.This work is framed in the networking activities of RedVitis (AGL2015-70931-REDT) and RedVitis 2.0 (AGL2017-90759-REDT), funded by the State Research Agency (AEI) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. Ms Diana Marin is beneficiary of postgraduate scholarship funded by Universidad Publica de Navarra (FPI-UPNA-2016). Dr Juan Emilio Palomares-Rius acknowledges the State Research Agency (AEI) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the 'Ramon y Cajal' Fellowship RYC-2017-22228 and Dr David Gramaje acknowledges Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the 'Ramon y Cajal' Fellowship RYC-2017-23098.Marín, D.; Armengol Fortí, J.; Carbonell-Bejerano, P.; Escalona, J.; Gramaje Pérez, D.; Hernández-Montes, E.; Intrigliolo, DS.... (2021). Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: tackling the issue from the roots. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 27(1):8-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12463S825271AGÜERO, C. B., URATSU, S. L., GREVE, C., POWELL, A. L. T., LABAVITCH, J. M., MEREDITH, C. P., & DANDEKAR, A. M. (2005). Evaluation of tolerance to Pierce’s disease andBotrytisin transgenic plants ofVitis viniferaL. expressing the pear PGIP gene. Molecular Plant Pathology, 6(1), 43-51. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00262.xAgustí-Brisach, C., Mostert, L., & Armengol, J. (2013). Detection and quantification ofIlyonectriaspp. associated with black-foot disease of grapevine in nursery soils using multiplex nested PCR and quantitative PCR. Plant Pathology, 63(2), 316-322. doi:10.1111/ppa.12093Agustí-Brisach, C., Gramaje, D., García-Jiménez, J., & Armengol, J. (2013). Detection of black-foot disease pathogens in the grapevine nursery propagation process in Spain. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 137(1), 103-112. doi:10.1007/s10658-013-0221-8Alaniz, S., García-Jiménez, J., Abad-Campos, P., & Armengol, J. (2010). Susceptibility of grapevine rootstocks to Cylindrocarpon liriodendri and C. macrodidymum. Scientia Horticulturae, 125(3), 305-308. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.009Alaniz, S., Armengol, J., León, M., García-Jiménez, J., & Abad-Campos, P. (2009). Analysis of genetic and virulence diversity of Cylindrocarpon liriodendri and C. macrodidymum associated with black foot disease of grapevine. Mycological Research, 113(1), 16-23. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2008.07.002Albacete, A., Martinez-Andujar, C., Martinez-Perez, A., Thompson, A. J., Dodd, I. C., & Perez-Alfocea, F. (2015). Unravelling rootstockxscion interactions to improve food security. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(8), 2211-2226. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv027Aragüés, R., Medina, E. T., Zribi, W., Clavería, I., Álvaro-Fuentes, J., & Faci, J. (2014). Soil salinization as a threat to the sustainability of deficit irrigation under present and expected climate change scenarios. Irrigation Science, 33(1), 67-79. doi:10.1007/s00271-014-0449-xBarrios-Masias, F. H., Knipfer, T., Walker, M. A., & McElrone, A. J. (2019). Differences in hydraulic traits of grapevine rootstocks are not conferred to a common Vitis vinifera scion. Functional Plant Biology, 46(3), 228. doi:10.1071/fp18110Bavaresco, L., Gardiman, M., Brancadoro, L., Espen, L., Failla, O., Scienza, A., … Testolin, R. (2015). Grapevine breeding programs in Italy. Grapevine Breeding Programs for the Wine Industry, 135-157. doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242-075-0.00007-7Berdeja, M., Nicolas, P., Kappel, C., Dai, Z. W., Hilbert, G., Peccoux, A., … Delrot, S. (2015). Water limitation and rootstock genotype interact to alter grape berry metabolism through transcriptome reprogramming. Horticulture Research, 2(1). doi:10.1038/hortres.2015.12Bert, P.-F., Bordenave, L., Donnart, M., Hévin, C., Ollat, N., & Decroocq, S. (2012). Mapping genetic loci for tolerance to lime-induced iron deficiency chlorosis in grapevine rootstocks (Vitis sp.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126(2), 451-473. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1993-5Bianchi, D., Grossi, D., Tincani, D. T. G., Simone Di Lorenzo, G., Brancadoro, L., & Rustioni, L. (2018). Multi-parameter characterization of water stress tolerance in Vitis hybrids for new rootstock selection. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 132, 333-340. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.018Bonada, M., Jeffery, D. W., Petrie, P. R., Moran, M. A., & Sadras, V. O. (2015). Impact of elevated temperature and water deficit on the chemical and sensory profiles of Barossa Shiraz grapes and wines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 21(2), 240-253. doi:10.1111/ajgw.12142Borie, B., Jacquiot, L., Jamaux-Despréaux, I., Larignon, P., & Péros, J.-P. (2002). Genetic diversity in populations of the fungiPhaeomoniella chlamydosporaandPhaeoacremonium aleophilumon grapevine in France. Plant Pathology, 51(1), 85-96. doi:10.1046/j.0032-0862.2001.658.xBravdo, B. (2012). EFFECTS OF SALINITY AND IRRIGATION WITH DESALINATED EFFLUENT AND SEA WATER ON PRODUCTION AND FRUIT QUALITY OF GRAPEVINES (REVIEW AND UPDATE). Acta Horticulturae, (931), 245-258. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2012.931.27Brown, D. S., Jaspers, M. V., Ridgway, H. J., Barclay, C. J., & Jones, E. E. (2013). Susceptibility of four grapevine rootstocks to Cylindrocladiella parva. New Zealand Plant Protection, 66, 249-253. doi:10.30843/nzpp.2013.66.5675Brunori, E., Farina, R., & Biasi, R. (2016). Sustainable viticulture: The carbon-sink function of the vineyard agro-ecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 223, 10-21. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.012Cabral, A., Rego, C., Nascimento, T., Oliveira, H., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2012). Multi-gene analysis and morphology reveal novel Ilyonectria species associated with black foot disease of grapevines. Fungal Biology, 116(1), 62-80. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2011.09.010Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Santa María, E., Torres-Pérez, R., Royo, C., Lijavetzky, D., Bravo, G., … Martínez-Zapater, J. M. (2013). Thermotolerance Responses in Ripening Berries of Vitis vinifera L. cv Muscat Hamburg. Plant and Cell Physiology, 54(7), 1200-1216. doi:10.1093/pcp/pct071Carneiro, R., Randig, O., Almeida, M. R., & Gomes, A. C. (2004). Additional information on Meloidogyne ethiopica Whitehead, 1968 (Tylenchida: Meloidogynidae), a root-knot nematode parasitising kiwi fruit and grape-vine from Brazil and Chile. Nematology, 6(1), 109-123. doi:10.1163/156854104323072982Castellarin, S. D., Matthews, M. A., Di Gaspero, G., & Gambetta, G. A. (2007). Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries. Planta, 227(1), 101-112. doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0598-8Chaverri, P., Salgado, C., Hirooka, Y., Rossman, A. Y., & Samuels, G. J. (2011). Delimitation of Neonectria and Cylindrocarpon (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales, Ascomycota) and related genera with Cylindrocarpon-like anamorphs. Studies in Mycology, 68, 57-78. doi:10.3114/sim.2011.68.03Chaves, M. M., Zarrouk, O., Francisco, R., Costa, J. M., Santos, T., Regalado, A. P., … Lopes, C. M. (2010). Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Annals of Botany, 105(5), 661-676. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq030Chitarra, W., Perrone, I., Avanzato, C. G., Minio, A., Boccacci, P., Santini, D., … Gambino, G. (2017). Grapevine Grafting: Scion Transcript Profiling and Defense-Related Metabolites Induced by Rootstocks. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00654Clark, J. R., & Finn, C. E. (2010). Register of New Fruit and Nut Cultivars List 45. HortScience, 45(5), 716-756. doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.5.716Clingeleffer, P., Morales, N., Davis, H., & Smith, H. (2019). The significance of scion × rootstock interactions. OENO One, 53(2). doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2019.53.2.2438COMAS, L. H., BAUERLE, T. L., & EISSENSTAT, D. M. (2010). Biological and environmental factors controlling root dynamics and function: effects of root ageing and soil moisture. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16, 131-137. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00078.xComas, L. H., Anderson, L. J., Dunst, R. M., Lakso, A. N., & Eissenstat, D. M. (2005). Canopy and environmental control of root dynamics in a long‐term study of Concord grape. New Phytologist, 167(3), 829-840. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01456.xComont, G., Corio-Costet, M.-F., Larignon, P., & Delmotte, F. (2010). AFLP markers reveal two genetic groups in the French population of the grapevine fungal pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 127(4), 451-464. doi:10.1007/s10658-010-9611-3Corso, M., & Bonghi, C. (2014). Grapevine rootstock effects on abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Science Today, 1(3), 108-113. doi:10.14719/pst.2014.1.3.64Corso, M., Vannozzi, A., Maza, E., Vitulo, N., Meggio, F., Pitacco, A., … Lucchin, M. (2015). Comprehensive transcript profiling of two grapevine rootstock genotypes contrasting in drought susceptibility links the phenylpropanoid pathway to enhanced tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(19), 5739-5752. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv274Costa, J. M., Vaz, M., Escalona, J., Egipto, R., Lopes, C., Medrano, H., & Chaves, M. M. (2016). Modern viticulture in southern Europe: Vulnerabilities and strategies for adaptation to water scarcity. Agricultural Water Management, 164, 5-18. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.021Cousins, P. (2005). Rootstock Breeding: An Analysis of Intractability. HortScience, 40(7), 1945-1946. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.1945Cramer W. Guiot J.andMarini K.(2019)MedECC booklet: risks associated to climate and environmental changes in the Mediterranean region. A preliminary assessment by the MedECC Network Science‐policy interface.https://www.medecc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/MedECC-Booklet_EN_WEB.pdfCummins, J. N., & Aldwinckle, H. S. (1995). Breeding rootstocks for tree fruit crops. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 23(4), 395-402. doi:10.1080/01140671.1995.9513915Davies, W. J., Kudoyarova, G., & Hartung, W. (2005). Long-distance ABA Signaling and Its Relation to Other Signaling Pathways in the Detection of Soil Drying and the Mediation of the Plant’s Response to Drought. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 24(4). doi:10.1007/s00344-005-0103-1Degu, A., Morcia, C., Tumino, G., Hochberg, U., Toubiana, D., Mattivi, F., … Fait, A. (2015). Metabolite profiling elucidates communalities and differences in the polyphenol biosynthetic pathways of red and white Muscat genotypes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 86, 24-33. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.11.006Delrot, S., Grimplet, J., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Schwandner, A., Bert, P.-F., Bavaresco, L., … Vezzulli, S. (2020). Genetic and Genomic Approaches for Adaptation of Grapevine to Climate Change. Genomic Designing of Climate-Smart Fruit Crops, 157-270. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97946-5_7Demangeat, G., Voisin, R., Minot, J.-C., Bosselut, N., Fuchs, M., & Esmenjaud, D. (2005). Survival of Xiphinema index in Vineyard Soil and Retention of Grapevine fanleaf virus Over Extended Time in the Absence of Host Plants. Phytopathology®, 95(10), 1151-1156. doi:10.1094/phyto-95-1151Downton, W. (1977). Photosynthesis in Salt-Stressed Grapevines. Functional Plant Biology, 4(2), 183. doi:10.1071/pp9770183Dutt, M., Li, Z. T., Kelley, K. T., Dhekney, S. A., Van Aman, M., Tattersall, J., & Gray, D. J. (2007). TRANSGENIC ROOTSTOCK PROTEIN TRANSMISSION IN GRAPEVINES. Acta Horticulturae, (738), 749-754. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2007.738.99Eissenstat, D. M., Bauerle, T. L., Comas, L. H., Lakso, A. N., Neilsen, D., Neilsen, G. H., & Smart, D. R. (2006). SEASONAL PATTERNS OF ROOT GROWTH IN RELATION TO SHOOT PHENOLOGY IN GRAPE AND APPLE. Acta Horticulturae, (721), 21-26. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2006.721.1ESCALONA, J. M., TOMÀS, M., MARTORELL, S., MEDRANO, H., RIBAS-CARBO, M., & FLEXAS, J. (2012). Carbon balance in grapevines under different soil water supply: importance of whole plant respiration. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 18(3), 308-318. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2012.00193.xEsmenjaud, D., & Bouquet, A. (2009). Selection and Application of Resistant Germplasm for Grapevine Nematodes Management. Integrated Management of Fruit Crops Nematodes, 195-214. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9858-1_8Fahrentrapp, J., Müller, L., & Schumacher, P. (2015). Is there need for leaf-galling grape phylloxera control? Presence and distribution ofDactulosphaira vitifoliaein Swiss vineyards. International Journal of Pest Management, 61(4), 340-345. doi:10.1080/09670874.2015.1067734FLEXAS, J., GALMÃ S, J., GALLÃ , A., GULÃ AS, J., POU, A., RIBAS-CARBO, M., … MEDRANO, H. (2010). Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: potential physiological targets for biotechnological improvement. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16, 106-121. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00057.xFort, K. P., Heinitz, C. C., & Walker, M. A. (2015). Chloride exclusion patterns in six grapevine populations. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 21(1), 147-155. doi:10.1111/ajgw.12125Foundation Plant Services(2020) Grape Variery: RS‐2. Grape program at Foundation Plant Services.https://fps.ucdavis.edu/Fraga, H., Malheiro, A. C., Moutinho‐Pereira, J., & Santos, J. A. (2012). An overview of climate change impacts on European viticulture. Food and Energy Security, 1(2), 94-110. doi:10.1002/fes3.14Franck, N., Morales, J. P., Arancibia‐Avendaño, D., García de Cortázar, V., Perez‐Quezada, J. F., Zurita‐Silva, A., & Pastenes, C. (2011). Seasonal fluctuations in Vitis vinifera root respiration in the field. New Phytologist, 192(4), 939-951. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03860.xFu, Q., Tan, Y., Zhai, H., & Du, Y. (2019). Evaluation of salt resistance mechanisms of grapevine hybrid rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 243, 148-158. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2018.07.034Funes, I., Savé, R., Rovira, P., Molowny-Horas, R., Alcañiz, J. M., Ascaso, E., … Vayreda, J. (2019). Agricultural soil organic carbon stocks in the north-eastern Iberian Peninsula: Drivers and spatial variability. Science of The Total Environment, 668, 283-294. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.317Galbignani, M., Merli, M. C., Magnanini, E., Bernizzoni, F., Talaverano, I., Gatti, M., … Poni, S. (2016). Gas exchange and water-use efficiency of cv. Sangiovese grafted to rootstocks of varying water-deficit tolerance. Irrigation Science, 34(2), 105-116. doi:10.1007/s00271-016-0490-zGambetta, G. A., Manuck, C. M., Drucker, S. T., Shaghasi, T., Fort, K., Matthews, M. A., … McElrone, A. J. (2012). The relationship between root hydraulics and scion vigour across Vitis rootstocks: what role do root aquaporins play? Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(18), 6445-6455. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers312Geier, T., Eimert, K., Scherer, R., & Nickel, C. (2008). Production and rooting behaviour of rolB-transgenic plants of grape rootstock ‘Richter 110’ (Vitis berlandieri × V. rupestris). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 94(3), 269-280. doi:10.1007/s11240-008-9352-6Girollet, N., Rubio, B., Lopez-Roques, C., Valière, S., Ollat, N., & Bert, P.-F. (2019). De novo phased assembly of the Vitis riparia grape genome. Scientific Data, 6(1). doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0133-3Gómez, J., Lasanta, C., Palacios-Santander, J. M., & Cubillana-Aguilera, L. M. (2015). Chemical modeling for pH prediction of acidified musts with gypsum and tartaric acid in warm regions. Food Chemistry, 168, 218-224. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.058Gong, H., Blackmore, D., Clingeleffer, P., Sykes, S., Jha, D., Tester, M., & Walker, R. (2010). Contrast in chloride exclusion between two grapevine genotypes and its variation in their hybrid progeny. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(3), 989-999. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq326Gramaje, D., & Armengol, J. (2011). Fungal Trunk Pathogens in the Grapevine Propagation Process: Potential Inoculum Sources, Detection, Identification, and Management Strategies. Plant Disease, 95(9), 1040-1055. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-11-0025Gramaje, D., Armengol, J., & Ridgway, H. J. (2012). Genetic and virulence diversity, and mating type distribution of Togninia minima causing grapevine trunk diseases in Spain. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 135(4), 727-743. doi:10.1007/s10658-012-0110-6Gramaje, D., García-Jiménez, J., & Armengol, J. (2010). Field Evaluation of Grapevine Rootstocks Inoculated with Fungi Associated with Petri Disease and Esca. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61(4), 512-520. doi:10.5344/ajev.2010.10021Gramaje, D., Úrbez-Torres, J. R., & Sosnowski, M. R. (2018). Managing Grapevine Trunk Diseases With Respect to Etiology and Epidemiology: Current Strategies and Future Prospects. Plant Disease, 102(1), 12-39. doi:10.1094/pdis-04-17-0512-feGramaje, D., Mostert, L., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2015). Phaeoacremonium: From esca disease to phaeohyphomycosis. Fungal Biology, 119(9), 759-783. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2015.06.004Gramaje, D., León, M., Santana, M., Crous, P. W., & Armengol, J. (2014). Multilocus ISSR Markers Reveal Two Major Genetic Groups in Spanish and South African Populations of the Grapevine Fungal Pathogen Cadophora luteo-olivacea. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e110417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110417Granett, J., Walker, M. A., Kocsis, L., & Omer, A. D. (2001). BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GRAPE PHYLLOXERA. Annual Review of Entomology, 46(1), 387-412. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.387Gubler, W. D., Baumgartner, K., Browne, G. T., Eskalen, A., Latham, S. R., Petit, E., & Bayramian, L. A. (2004). Root diseases of grapevines in California and their control. Australasian Plant Pathology, 33(2), 157. doi:10.1071/ap04019Gullo, G., Dattola, A., Vonella, V., & Zappia, R. (2018). Evaluation of water relation parameters in vitis rootstocks with different drought tolerance and their effects on growth of a grafted cultivar. Journal of Plant Physiology, 226, 172-178. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.013Haider, M. S., Jogaiah, S., Pervaiz, T., Yanxue, Z., Khan, N., & Fang, J. (2019). Physiological and transcriptional variations inducing complex adaptive mechanisms in grapevine by salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 162, 455-467. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.022Hajdu, E. (2015). Grapevine breeding in Hungary. Grapevine Breeding Programs for the Wine Industry, 103-134. doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242-075-0.00006-5Harbertson, J. F., & Keller, M. (2011). Rootstock Effects on Deficit-Irrigated Winegrapes in a Dry Climate: Grape and Wine Composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63(1), 40-48. doi:10.5344/ajev.2011.11079Haywood, V., Yu, T.-S., Huang, N.-C., & Lucas, W. J. (2005). Phloem long-distance trafficking of GIBBERELLIC ACID-INSENSITIVE RNA regulates leaf development. The Plant Journal, 42(1), 49-68. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02351.xHe, F., Mu, L., Yan, G.-L., Liang, N.-N., Pan, Q.-H., Wang, J., … Duan, C.-Q. (2010). Biosynthesis of Anthocyanins and Their Regulation in Colored Grapes. Molecules, 15(12), 9057-9091. doi:10.3390/molecules15129057He, R., Zhuang, Y., Cai, Y., Agüero, C. B., Liu, S., Wu, J., … Zhang, Y. (2018). Overexpression of 9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid Dioxygenase Cisgene in Grapevine Increases Drought Tolerance and Results in Pleiotropic Effects. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00970Heinitz, C. C., Riaz, S., Tenscher, A. C., Romero, N., & Walker, M. A. (2020). Survey of chloride exclusion in grape germplasm from the southwestern United States and Mexico. Crop Science, 60(4), 1946-1956. doi:10.1002/csc2.20085Hemmer, C., Djennane, S., Ackerer, L., Hleibieh, K., Marmonier, A., Gersch, S., … Ritzenthaler, C. (2017). Nanobody-mediated resistance to Grapevine fanleaf virus in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 16(2), 660-671. doi:10.1111/pbi.12819Henderson, S. W., Baumann, U., Blackmore, D. H., Walker, A. R., Walker, R. R., & Gilliham, M. (2014). Shoot chloride exclusion and salt tolerance in grapevine is associated with differential ion transporter expression in roots. BMC Plant Biology, 14(1). doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0273-8Henderson, S. W., Dunlevy, J. D., Wu, Y., Blackmore, D. H., Walker, R. R., Edwards, E. J., … Walker, A. R. (2017). Functional differences in transport properties of natural HKT 1;1 variants influence shoot Na + exclusion in grapevine rootstocks. New Phytologist, 217(3), 1113-1127. doi:10.1111/nph.14888Hernández-Montes, E., Escalona, J. M., Tomás, M., & Medrano, H. (2017). Influence of water availability and grapevine phenological stage on the spatial variation in soil respiration. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 23(2), 273-279. doi:10.1111/ajgw.12279De Herralde, F., Sa

Preciriego: Un proyecto de colaboración público‐privada para adaptar la irrigación de precisión al riego por goteo de los cultivos leñosos

En las últimas décadas se han realizado grandes avances para ajustar la dosis de riego a aplicar las necesidades hídricas promedio de una parcela, tendiendo hacia un riego de precisión. El siguiente reto que aborda el proyecto Preciriego es tener en cuenta la variabilidad en las parcelas para ajustar el riego a las posibles diferencias existentes. Mientras en cultivos herbáceos más extensivos y bajo riego por aspersión con Pivots este desafío ha sido ya abordado, se han realizado menos trabajos en cultivos leñosos y riego por goteo. En esta comunicación se integran técnicas de teledetección de rango cercano utilizando drones y modelos hidráulicos de precisión para llevar a cabo una zonificación de un viñedo comercial para definir tres zonas con distintos índices de vigor vegetativo. Posteriormente, se ha aplicado un riego diferencial para cada zona de modo que, manteniendo la dosis promedio establecida de unos 1000 m3/ha, la misma ha sido aplicada de forma diferencial en función del vigor de las cepas. Para ello se ha variado el diseño agronómico del riego, utilizando distintas distancias entre goteros en función de la zonificación realizada. De este modo, sin tener que sectorizar ni aplicar tiempos o frecuencias de riego distintas para cada zona, la pluviosidad de la instalación fue distinta. Dicha estrategia de riego de precisión ha sido validada en campo, demostrando que las zonas de mayor vigor vegetativo han aprovechado mejor la mayor dotación de riego empleada teniendo una mayor producción frente a otras zonas con menor desarrollo vegetativo donde se ha considerado que la productividad de las cepas podía estar limitada por otros factores al margen del riego. Otra de las ventajas del sistema de riego de precisión radica en la automatización de la programación llevada a cabo desarrollada mediante nuevos programadores con posibilidad de tele‐lectura y fácil instalación en parcela. La puesta en práctica de los sistemas de riego de precisión sigue adelante en el proyecto Preciriego con otros ensayos en marcha en cultivos leñosos y hortícolas al aire libre

Decision support system for selecting the rootstock, irrigation regime and nitrogen fertilization in winemaking vineyards: WANUGRAPE4.0

We aim to develop and transfer to the wine sector a decision support system (DSS) in the frame of WANEGRAPE4.0 project that, integrated into a geographic information system, helps wine growers in i) selecting the most suitable rootstock given some agroecological conditions and oenological objectives; and ii) managing irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in the most suitable way for the selected rootstock and agroecological conditions. The following goals have been achieved. First, the modular structure and information flow of the DSS has been defined. Second, the main algorithms of the water balance module (DSS core part) have been formulated and the module coded in a spreadsheet. Third, this water balance module has been tested with data from field experiments in several regions of Spain. Fourth, the relationships between grapevine water status and production and harvest quality variables have been established, revealing an always-significant effects of the decrease in water stress on vegetative development, yield, and grape composition. Fifth, the nitrogen fertilizer effects on vine performance has been assessed. Sixth, the effects rootstocks have on 5 parameters of vine production and grape quality for winemaking have been established too by doing another meta-analysis of rootstock trials. Seventh, a rootstock selection module has been defined. The WANUGRAPE4.0 project goes on with the integration of all its modules, their coding in a World Wide Web language and their publication on an Internet portal