Folding Kinetics and Structure of OEP16

The chloroplast outer membrane contains different, specialized pores that are involved in highly specific traffic processes from the cytosol into the chloroplast and vice versa. One representative member of these channels is the outer envelope protein 16 (OEP16), a cation-selective high conductance channel with high selectivity for amino acids. Here we study the mechanism and kinetics of the folding of this membrane protein by fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy, using deletion mutants of the two single tryptophanes Trp-77→Phe-77 and Trp-100→Phe-100. In addition, the wild-type spectra were deconvoluted, depicting the individual contributions from each of the two tryptophan residues. The results show that both tryptophan residues are located in a completely different environment. The Trp-77 is deeply buried in the hydrophobic part of the protein, whereas the Trp-100 is partially solvent exposed. These results were further confirmed by studies of fluorescence quenching with I(−). The kinetics of the protein folding are studied by stopped flow fluorescence and circular dichroism measurements. The folding process depends highly on the detergent concentration and can be divided into an ultrafast phase (k > 1000 s(−1)), a fast phase (200–800 s(−1)), and a slow phase (25–70 s(−1)). The slow phase is absent in the W100F mutant. Secondary structure analysis and comparision with closely related proteins led to a new model of the structure of OEP16, suggesting that the protein is, in contrast to most other outer membrane proteins studied so far, purely α-helical, consisting of four transmembrane helices. Trp-77 is located in helix II, whereas the Trp-100 is located in the loop between helices II and III, close to the interface to helix III. We suggest that the first, very fast process corresponds to the formation of the helices, whereas the insertion of the helices into the detergent micelle and the correct folding of the II-III loop may be the later, rate-limiting steps of the folding process

Modulation of insulin degrading enzyme activity and liver cell proliferation.

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM), insulin therapy, and hyperinsulinemia are independent risk factors of liver cancer. Recently, the use of a novel inhibitor of insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) was proposed as a new therapeutic strategy in T2DM. However, IDE inhibition might stimulate liver cell proliferation via increased intracellular insulin concentration. The aim of this study was to characterize effects of inhibition of IDE activity in HepG2 hepatoma cells and to analyze liver specific expression of IDE in subjects with T2DM. HepG2 cells were treated with 10 nM insulin for 24 h with or without inhibition of IDE activity using IDE RNAi, and cell transcriptome and proliferation rate were analyzed. Human liver samples (n=22) were used for the gene expression profiling by microarrays. In HepG2 cells, IDE knockdown changed expression of genes involved in cell cycle and apoptosis pathways. Proliferation rate was lower in IDE knockdown cells than in controls. Microarray analysis revealed the decrease of hepatic IDE expression in subjects with T2DM accompanied by the downregulation of the p53-dependent genes FAS and CCNG2, but not by the upregulation of proliferation markers MKI67, MCM2 and PCNA. Similar results were found in the liver microarray dataset from GEO Profiles database. In conclusion, IDE expression is decreased in liver of subjects with T2DM which is accompanied by the dysregulation of p53 pathway. Prolonged use of IDE inhibitors for T2DM treatment should be carefully tested in animal studies regarding its potential effect on hepatic tumorigenesis

Chloroplast biogenesis: The use of mutants to study the etioplast–chloroplast transition

In angiosperm plants, the etioplast–chloroplast transition is light-dependent. A key factor in this process is the protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A (PORA), which catalyzes the light-induced reduction of protochlorophyllide to chlorophyllide. The import pathway of the precursor protein prePORA into chloroplasts was analyzed in vivo and in vitro by using homozygous loss-of-function mutants in genes coding for chlorophyllide a oxygenase (CAO) or for members of the outer-envelope solute-channel protein family of 16 kDa (OEP16), both of which have been implied to be key factors for the import of prePORA. Our in vivo analyses show that cao or oep16 mutants contain a normally structured prolamellar body that contains the protochlorophyllide holochrome. Furthermore, etioplasts from cao and oep16 mutants contain PORA protein as found by mass spectrometry. Our data demonstrate that both CAO and OEP16 are dispensable for chloroplast biogenesis and play no central role in the import of prePORA in vivo and in vitro as further indicated by protein import studies

Delta-Like Ligand 4 Modulates Liver Damage by Down-Regulating Chemokine Expression

Cancer Signaling networks and Molecular Therapeutic