Guidelines for quantification of noise-induced hearing loss in a medicolegal context

ObjectivesGuidelines published in 2000 by the authors are widely used by medical and legal professionals in the UK for diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss in a medicolegal context. However, they cannot be used for quantification of the noise-induced hearing loss, which is required in most cases. This requirement is addressed.DesignA method is developed here to quantify noise-induced hearing loss, thereby overcoming this shortcoming.SettingAssessment of noise-induced hearing loss in medicolegal cases.ParticipantsA consecutive series of 124 cases of noise-induced hearing loss is used for evaluation.Main outcome measureMagnitude of noise-induced hearing loss based on hearing threshold levels averaged over the frequencies 1, 2 and 3 kHz.ResultsThe rationale of the method, practical application and three worked examples are developed. A simpler short-cut method is developed and shown to be equivalent to the full method in most cases.ConclusionsThe method offers a practical approach to quantification of noise-induced hearing loss

Association between bone mineral density and hearing loss in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heritable connective tissue disorder, predominantly characterized by bone fragility. In half of the patients, progressive hearing loss develops, which is associated with abnormal bony changes involving the middle ear ossicles and stapes footplate. In the present study, we investigated whether the development of hearing loss in OI may be related to the overall aberrant bone quality. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Following audiologic evaluation, 56 adult OI patients were classified as presenting normal hearing or conductive/mixed or pure sensorineural hearing loss. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) (aBMD) was measured using lumbar spine (LS) and whole body (WB) dual X-ray absorptiometry. By means of peripheral computed tomography, volumetric BMD (vBMD) and morphometric bone parameters were determined at distal and proximal radius, providing separate results for trabecular and cortical bone. The obtained bone parameters were compared between normal-hearing OI patients and those with either conductive/mixed or pure sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Z scores demonstrated decreased LS aBMD, WB aBMD, and trabecular vBMD in OI adults compared to the healthy population. Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss had lower trabecular vBMD compared to those with normal hearing or pure sensorineural loss at both whole-group and between-relatives comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: It is hypothesized that OI patients with lower BMD might be more susceptible to accumulating microfractures, which may interfere with the bone remodeling inhibition pathways in the temporal bone and, therefore, contribute to stapes footplate fixation and a conductive hearing loss component.1 februari 201

A Novel TECTA Mutation in a Dutch DFNA8/12 Family Confirms Genotype–Phenotype Correlation

A novel TECTA mutation, p.R1890C, was found in a Dutch family with nonsyndromic autosomal dominant sensorineural hearing impairment. In early life, presumably congenital, hearing impairment occurred in the midfrequency range, amounting to about 40 dB at 1 kHz. Speech recognition was good with all phoneme recognition scores exceeding 90%. An intact horizontal vestibuloocular reflex was found in four tested patients. The missense mutation is located in the zona pellucida (ZP) domain of α-tectorin. Mutations affecting the ZP domain of α-tectorin are significantly associated with midfrequency hearing impairment. Substitutions affecting other amino acid residues than cysteines show a significant association with hearing impairment without progression. Indeed, in the present family progression seemed to be absent. In addition, the presently identified mutation affecting the ZP domain resulted in a substantially lesser degree of hearing impairment than was previously reported for DFNA8/12 traits with mutations affecting the ZP domain of α-tectorin

An economic evaluation of screening 60- to 70- year-old adults for hearing loss

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is common among older adults and has consequences for sufferers, families and society, but there is substantial unmet need for intervention. Screening could expedite intervention and improve outcomes. METHODS: We use Markov models to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of potential screening programmes compared with current provision (GP-referral), from a health service perspective. Alternative options are investigated through scenario analysis. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses are undertaken. RESULTS: All modelled screens are cost-effective and reduce unmet need for hearing aids. The most cost-effective option identified is a one-stage audiometric screen for bilateral hearing loss =30 dB hearing level (HL) at age 60, repeated at ages 65 and 70. This option has an ICER of £1461 compared to GP-referral and would mean an additional 15 437 adults benefiting from hearing intervention per 100 000 population aged 60. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve shows that screening is more cost-effective than GP-referral provided a Quality Adjusted Life Year is valued at £2000 or more. CONCLUSIONS: Adult hearing screening would provide a cost-effective way to improve quality of life for older adults. We recommend piloting an audiometric screen offered to all adults age 60, 65 and 70 years to identify bilateral hearing loss of at least 30 dB HL