166 research outputs found
Interaction and Localization of One-electron Orbitals in an Organic Molecule: Fictitious Parameter Analysis for Multi-physics Simulations
We present a new methodology to analyze complicated multi-physics simulations
by introducing a fictitious parameter. Using the method, we study quantum
mechanical aspects of an organic molecule in water. The simulation is
variationally constructed from the ab initio molecular orbital method and the
classical statistical mechanics with the fictitious parameter representing the
coupling strength between solute and solvent. We obtain a number of
one-electron orbital energies of the solute molecule derived from the
Hartree-Fock approximation, and eigenvalue-statistical analysis developed in
the study of nonintegrable systems is applied to them. Based on the results, we
analyze localization properties of the electronic wavefunctions under the
influence of the solvent.Comment: 4 pages, 5 figures, the revised version will appear in J. Phys. Soc.
Jpn. Vol.76 (No.1
Reduced Effectiveness of Standard Recruitment for Deceased Organ Donor Registration: The Need for Population-Specific Recruitment Materials
Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus Reduces Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in a Comparative Modeling Analysis
No Abstract Availabl
Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany
Background Despite strong recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC)
screening, participation rates are low. Understanding factors that affect
screening choices is essential to developing future screening strategies.
Therefore, this study assessed patient willingness to use non-invasive stool
or blood based screening tests after refusing colonoscopy. Methods
Participants were recruited during regular consultations. Demographic, health,
psychological and socioeconomic factors were recorded. All subjects were
advised to undergo screening by colonoscopy. Subjects who refused colonoscopy
were offered a choice of non-invasive tests. Subjects who selected stool
testing received a collection kit and instructions; subjects who selected
plasma testing had a blood draw during the office visit. Stool samples were
tested with the Hb/Hp Complex Elisa test, and blood samples were tested with
the Epi proColon® 2.0 test. Patients who were positive for either were advised
to have a diagnostic colonoscopy. Results 63 of 172 subjects were compliant to
screening colonoscopy (37%). 106 of the 109 subjects who refused colonoscopy
accepted an alternative non-invasive method (97%). 90 selected the Septin9
blood test (83%), 16 selected a stool test (15%) and 3 refused any test (3%).
Reasons for blood test preference included convenience of an office draw,
overall convenience and less time consuming procedure. Conclusions 97% of
subjects refusing colonoscopy accepted a non-invasive screening test of which
83% chose the Septin9 blood test. The observation that participation can be
increased by offering non-invasive tests, and that a blood test is the
preferred option should be validated in a prospective trial in the screening
setting
Phase II trial of intralesional therapy with interleukin-2 in soft-tissue melanoma metastases
Optimizing Management of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Low-Grade or No Dysplasia Based on Comparative Modeling
Background & Aims: Endoscopic treatment is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia, yet clinical management recommendations are inconsistent for patients with BE without dysplasia (NDBE) or with low-grade dysplasia (LGD). We used a comparative modeling analysis to identify optimal management strategies for these patients. Methods: We used 3 independent population-based models to simulate cohorts of 60-year-old individuals with BE in the United States. We followed up each cohort until death without surveillance and treatment (natural disease progression), compared with 78 different strategies of management for patients with NDBE or LGD. We determined the optimal strategy using cost-effectiveness analyses, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 5.7 million per 1000 men with BE. Surveillance and treatment of men with BE prevented 23% to 75% of cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but increased costs to 17.3 million per 1000 men with BE. The optimal strategy was surveillance every 3 years for men with NDBE and treatment of LGD after confirmation by repeat endoscopy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, 36,045/QALY). Conclusions: Based on analyses from 3 population-based models, the optimal management strategy for patient with BE and LGD is endoscopic eradication, but only after LGD is confirmed by a repeat endoscopy. The optimal strategy for patients with NDBE is endoscopic surveillance, using a 3-year interval for men and a 5-year interval for women
BOB CAT: a Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett’s Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia
OBJECTIVES:
Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a common premalignant lesion for which surveillance is recommended. This strategy is limited by considerable variations in clinical practice. We conducted an international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of BE and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD).
METHODS:
We defined the scope, proposed statements, and searched electronic databases, yielding 20,558 publications that were screened, selected online, and formed the evidence base. We used a Delphi consensus process, with an 80% agreement threshold, using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to categorize the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
RESULTS:
In total, 80% of respondents agreed with 55 of 127 statements in the final voting rounds. Population endoscopic screening is not recommended and screening should target only very high-risk cases of males aged over 60 years with chronic uncontrolled reflux. A new international definition of BE was agreed upon. For any degree of dysplasia, at least two specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists are required. Risk factors for cancer include male gender, length of BE, and central obesity. Endoscopic resection should be used for visible, nodular areas. Surveillance is not recommended for <5 years of life expectancy. Management strategies for indefinite dysplasia (IND) and LGD were identified, including a de-escalation strategy for lower-risk patients and escalation to intervention with follow-up for higher-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
In this uniquely large consensus process in gastroenterology, we made key clinical recommendations for the escalation/de-escalation of BE in clinical practice. We made strong recommendations for the prioritization of future research
Cost-effectiveness of using a gene expression profiling test to aid in identifying the primary tumour in patients with cancer of unknown primary
Towards screening Barrett’s Oesophagus: current guidelines, imaging modalities and future developments
Barrett’s oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Although guidelines on the screening and surveillance exist in Barrett’s oesophagus, the current strategies are inadequate. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) is the gold standard method in screening for Barrett’s oesophagus. This invasive method is expensive with associated risks negating its use as a current screening tool for Barrett’s oesophagus. This review explores current definitions, epidemiology, biomarkers, surveillance, and screening in Barrett’s oesophagus. Imaging modalities applicable to this condition are discussed, in addition to future developments. There is an urgent need for an alternative non-invasive method of screening and/or surveillance which could be highly beneficial towards reducing waiting times, alleviating patient fears and reducing future costs in current healthcare services. Vibrational spectroscopy has been shown to be promising in categorising Barrett’s oesophagus through to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and OAC. These techniques need further validation through multicentre trials
- …