Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh

Contains fulltext : 96379.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the complications and anatomical and functional outcomes of the surgical treatment of mesh-related complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent complete or partial mesh excision to treat complications after prior mesh-augmented pelvic floor reconstructive surgery was conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients underwent 30 complete and 51 partial mesh excisions. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 cases, postoperative complications in 13. Symptom relief was achieved in 92% of patients. Recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurred in 29% of complete and 5% of partial excisions of mesh used in POP surgery. De novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurred in 36% of patients who underwent excision of a suburethral sling. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh excision relieves mesh-related complications effectively, although with a substantial risk of serious complications and recurrence of POP or SUI. More complex excisions should be performed in skilled centers

Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bicentre prospective cohort study

Objective: Robot‐assisted surgery is a recognized treatment for pelvic‐organ prolapse. Many of the surgical subgroup outcomes for apical prolapse are reported together leading to a paucity of homogenous data. Design: Prospective observational cohort study (https://clinicaltrials.gov; identifier NCT01598467) assessing outcomes for homogeneous subgroups of robot‐assisted apical prolapse surgery. Setting: Two European tertiary referral hospitals. Population: Consecutive patients undergoing robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) and supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy (RSHS). Methods: Anatomical cure (simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (sPOPQ) stage 1,), subjective cure (symptoms of bulge) and quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire [PFIQ‐7]). Main Outcome measures: Primary outcome: anatomical and subjective cure. Secondary outcomes: surgical safety and intraoperative variables. Results: Total 305 patients included (RASC N=188, RSHS N=117). Twelve months follow‐up available for 144 (RASC 76.6%) and 109 (RSHS 93.2%). Anatomical success of the apical compartment occurred in 91% (RASC) and in 99% (RSHS). In all compartments, success percentages were 67% and 65% respectively. Most recurrences were anterior compartment (15.7% RASC [symptomatic 12.1%]; 22.9% RSHS [symptomatic 4.8%]). Symptoms of bulge improved from 97.4% to 17.4% (p<0.0005). PFIQ‐7 scores improved from 76.7 ± 62.3 to 13.5 ± 31.1 (p<0.0005). Duration of surgery increased significantly in RSHS (183.1 ± 38.2 versus 145.3 ± 29.8 [p<0.0005]). Intraoperative complications and conversion rates were low (RASC: 5.3% and 4.3%; RSHS: 0.0% and 0.0%). Four severe postoperative complications occurred after RASC (2.1%) and one after RSHS (1.6%). Conclusion: This is the largest reported prospective cohort study on robot‐assisted apical prolapse surgery. Both procedures are safe, with durable results

Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries.

BACKGROUND: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there remains a need to understand the adverse effects of surgery and define appropriate levels of perioperative care. METHODS: We designed a prospective international 7-day cohort study of outcomes following elective adult inpatient surgery in 27 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes were death following a complication (failure to rescue) and death in hospital. Process measures were admission to critical care immediately after surgery or to treat a complication and duration of hospital stay. A single definition of critical care was used for all countries. RESULTS: A total of 474 hospitals in 19 high-, 7 middle- and 1 low-income country were included in the primary analysis. Data included 44 814 patients with a median hospital stay of 4 (range 2-7) days. A total of 7508 patients (16.8%) developed one or more postoperative complication and 207 died (0.5%). The overall mortality among patients who developed complications was 2.8%. Mortality following complications ranged from 2.4% for pulmonary embolism to 43.9% for cardiac arrest. A total of 4360 (9.7%) patients were admitted to a critical care unit as routine immediately after surgery, of whom 2198 (50.4%) developed a complication, with 105 (2.4%) deaths. A total of 1233 patients (16.4%) were admitted to a critical care unit to treat complications, with 119 (9.7%) deaths. Despite lower baseline risk, outcomes were similar in low- and middle-income compared with high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Poor patient outcomes are common after inpatient surgery. Global initiatives to increase access to surgical treatments should also address the need for safe perioperative care. STUDY REGISTRATION: ISRCTN5181700