De-Novo Discovery of Differentially Abundant Transcription Factor Binding Sites Including Their Positional Preference

Transcription factors are a main component of gene regulation as they activate or repress gene expression by binding to specific binding sites in promoters. The de-novo discovery of transcription factor binding sites in target regions obtained by wet-lab experiments is a challenging problem in computational biology, which has not been fully solved yet. Here, we present a de-novo motif discovery tool called Dispom for finding differentially abundant transcription factor binding sites that models existing positional preferences of binding sites and adjusts the length of the motif in the learning process. Evaluating Dispom, we find that its prediction performance is superior to existing tools for de-novo motif discovery for 18 benchmark data sets with planted binding sites, and for a metazoan compendium based on experimental data from micro-array, ChIP-chip, ChIP-DSL, and DamID as well as Gene Ontology data. Finally, we apply Dispom to find binding sites differentially abundant in promoters of auxin-responsive genes extracted from Arabidopsis thaliana microarray data, and we find a motif that can be interpreted as a refined auxin responsive element predominately positioned in the 250-bp region upstream of the transcription start site. Using an independent data set of auxin-responsive genes, we find in genome-wide predictions that the refined motif is more specific for auxin-responsive genes than the canonical auxin-responsive element. In general, Dispom can be used to find differentially abundant motifs in sequences of any origin. However, the positional distribution learned by Dispom is especially beneficial if all sequences are aligned to some anchor point like the transcription start site in case of promoter sequences. We demonstrate that the combination of searching for differentially abundant motifs and inferring a position distribution from the data is beneficial for de-novo motif discovery. Hence, we make the tool freely available as a component of the open-source Java framework Jstacs and as a stand-alone application at http://www.jstacs.de/index.php/Dispom

A modular analysis of the Auxin signalling network

Auxin is essential for plant development from embryogenesis onwards. Auxin acts in large part through regulation of transcription. The proteins acting in the signalling pathway regulating transcription downstream of auxin have been identified as well as the interactions between these proteins, thus identifying the topology of this network implicating 54 Auxin Response Factor (ARF) and Aux/IAA (IAA) transcriptional regulators. Here, we study the auxin signalling pathway by means of mathematical modeling at the single cell level. We proceed analytically, by considering the role played by five functional modules into which the auxin pathway can be decomposed: the sequestration of ARF by IAA, the transcriptional repression by IAA, the dimer formation amongst ARFs and IAAs, the feedback loop on IAA and the auxin induced degradation of IAA proteins. Focusing on these modules allows assessing their function within the dynamics of auxin signalling. One key outcome of this analysis is that there are both specific and overlapping functions between all the major modules of the signaling pathway. This suggests a combinatorial function of the modules in optimizing the speed and amplitude of auxin-induced transcription. Our work allows identifying potential functions for homo- and hetero-dimerization of transcriptional regulators, with ARF:IAA, IAA:IAA and ARF:ARF dimerization respectively controlling the amplitude, speed and sensitivity of the response and a synergistic effect of the interaction of IAA with transcriptional repressors on these characteristics of the signaling pathway. Finally, we also suggest experiments which might allow disentangling the structure of the auxin signaling pathway and analysing further its function in plants

Alanine Zipper-Like Coiled-Coil Domains Are Necessary for Homotypic Dimerization of Plant GAGA-Factors in the Nucleus and Nucleolus

GAGA-motif binding proteins control transcriptional activation or repression of homeotic genes. Interestingly, there are no sequence similarities between animal and plant proteins. Plant BBR/BPC-proteins can be classified into two distinct groups: Previous studies have elaborated on group I members only and so little is known about group II proteins. Here, we focused on the initial characterization of AtBPC6, a group II protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparison of orthologous BBR/BPC sequences disclosed two conserved signatures besides the DNA binding domain. A first peptide signature is essential and sufficient to target AtBPC6-GFP to the nucleus and nucleolus. A second domain is predicted to form a zipper-like coiled-coil structure. This novel type of domain is similar to Leucine zippers, but contains invariant alanine residues with a heptad spacing of 7 amino acids. By yeast-2-hybrid and BiFC-assays we could show that this Alanine zipper domain is essential for homotypic dimerization of group II proteins in vivo. Interhelical salt bridges and charge-stabilized hydrogen bonds between acidic and basic residues of the two monomers are predicted to form an interaction domain, which does not follow the classical knobs-into-holes zipper model. FRET-FLIM analysis of GFP/RFP-hybrid fusion proteins validates the formation of parallel dimers in planta. Sequence comparison uncovered that this type of domain is not restricted to BBR/BPC proteins, but is found in all kingdoms

A remarkable synergistic effect at the transcriptomic level in peach fruits doubly infected by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus and Peach latent mosaic viroid

[EN] Background: Microarray profiling is a powerful technique to investigate expression changes of large amounts of genes in response to specific environmental conditions. The majority of the studies investigating gene expression changes in virus-infected plants are limited to interactions between a virus and a model host plant, which usually is Arabidopsis thaliana or Nicotiana benthamiana. In the present work, we performed microarray profiling to explore changes in the expression profile of field-grown Prunus persica (peach) originating from Chile upon single and double infection with Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV) and Peach latent mosaic viroid (PLMVd), worldwide natural pathogens of peach trees. Results: Upon single PLMVd or PNRSV infection, the number of statistically significant gene expression changes was relatively low. By contrast, doubly-infected fruits presented a high number of differentially regulated genes. Among these, down-regulated genes were prevalent. Functional categorization of the gene expression changes upon double PLMVd and PNRSV infection revealed protein modification and degradation as the functional category with the highest percentage of repressed genes whereas induced genes encoded mainly proteins related to phosphate, C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism and also protein modification. Overrepresentation analysis upon double infection with PLMVd and PNRSV revealed specific functional categories over- and underrepresented among the repressed genes indicating active counter-defense mechanisms of the pathogens during infection. Conclusions: Our results identify a novel synergistic effect of PLMVd and PNRSV on the transcriptome of peach fruits. We demonstrate that mixed infections, which occur frequently in field conditions, result in a more complex transcriptional response than that observed in single infections. Thus, our data demonstrate for the first time that the simultaneous infection of a viroid and a plant virus synergistically affect the host transcriptome in infected peach fruits. These field studies can help to fully understand plant-pathogen interactions and to develop appropriate crop protection strategies.We thank Drs M.A. Perez-Amador y J. Gadea for helping in the result analysis. This work was supported by grant BIO2011-25018 from the Spanish granting agency Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica for the transcriptomic analyses and from the grant 2009CL0020 from the bilateral project INIA-Chile/CSIC-Spain for the phytosanitary evaluation. MC Herranz was the recipient of a contract from the Juan de la Cierva program of the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain.Herranz Gordo, MDC.; Niehl, A.; Rosales, M.; Fiore, N.; Zamorano, A.; Granell Richart, A.; Pallás Benet, V. (2013). A remarkable synergistic effect at the transcriptomic level in peach fruits doubly infected by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus and Peach latent mosaic viroid. Virology Journal. 10:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-164S111510Pallas V, Garcia JA: How do plant viruses induce disease? Interactions and interference with host components. J Gen Virol 2011, 92: 2691-2705.Whitham SA, Yang C, Goodin MM: Global impact: elucidating plant responses to viral infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19: 1207-1215.Havelda Z, Varallyay E, Valoczi A, Burgyan J: Plant virus infection-induced persistent host gene downregulation in systemically infected leaves. Plant J 2008, 55: 278-288.Aranda M, Maule A: Virus-induced host gene shutoff in animals and plants. Virology 1998, 243: 261-267.Whitham SA, Quan S, Chang HS, Cooper B, Estes B, Zhu T, Wang X, Hou YM: Diverse RNA viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptible Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant J 2003, 33: 271-283.Liu Y, Ren D, Pike S, Pallardy S, Gassmann W, Zhang S: Chloroplast-generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response-like cell death mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Plant J 2007, 51: 941-954.Hadidi A, Barba M: Economic impact of pome and stone fruit viruses and viroids. In Virus and Virus Like Diseases of Pome and Stone Fruits. Edited by: Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society; 2011:1-8.Flores R, Delgado S, Rodio ME, Ambros S, Hernandez C, Serio FD: Peach latent mosaic viroid: not so latent. Mol Plant Pathol 2006, 7: 209-221.Pallas V, Aparicio F, Herranz MC, Amari K, Sanchez-Pina MA, Myrta A, Sanchez-Navarro JA: Ilarviruses of Prunus spp.: A continued concern for fruit trees. Phytopathology 2012,102(12):1108-1120.Rowland O, Jones JD: Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays. Genome Biol 2001,2(1):1001.1-1001.3.Trinks D, Rajeswaran R, Shivaprasad PV, Akbergenov R, Oakeley EJ, Veluthambi K, Hohn T, Pooggin MM: Suppression of RNA silencing by a geminivirus nuclear protein, AC2, correlates with transactivation of host genes. J Virol 2005, 79: 2517-2527.Senthil G, Liu H, Puram VG, Clark A, Stromberg A, Goodin MM: Specific and common changes in Nicotiana benthamiana gene expression in response to infection by enveloped viruses. J Gen Virol 2005, 86: 2615-2625.Marathe R, Guan Z, Anandalakshmi R, Zhao H, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Study of Arabidopsis thaliana resistome in response to cucumber mosaic virus infection using whole genome microarray. Plant Mol Biol 2004, 55: 501-520.Agudelo-Romero P, Carbonell P, de la Iglesia F, Carrera J, Rodrigo G, Jaramillo A, Perez-Amador MA, Elena SF: Changes in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana after infection with Tobacco etch virus. Virol J 2008, 5: 92.Itaya A, Matsuda Y, Gonzales RA, Nelson RS, Ding B: Potato spindle tuber viroid strains of different pathogenicity induces and suppresses expression of common and unique genes in infected tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2002, 15: 990-999.Huang Z, Yeakley JM, Garcia EW, Holdridge JD, Fan JB, Whitham SA: Salicylic acid-dependent expression of host genes in compatible Arabidopsis-virus interactions. Plant Physiol 2005, 137: 1147-1159.Rizza S, Conesa A, Juarez J, Catara A, Navarro L, Duran-Vila N, Ancillo G: Microarray analysis of Etrog citron (Citrus medica L.) reveals changes in chloroplast, cell wall, peroxidase and symporter activities in response to viroid infection. Mol Plant Pathol 2012,13(8):852-864.Golem S, Culver JN: Tobacco mosaic virus induced alterations in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2003, 16: 681-688.Dardick C: Comparative expression profiling of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves systemically infected with three fruit tree viruses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007, 20: 1004-1017.Hull R: In Matthews’ Plant Virology. London: Edited by Academic Press; 2002.Gonzalez-Jara P, Tenllado F, Martinez-Garcia B, Atencio FA, Barajas D, Vargas M, Diaz-Ruiz J, Diaz-Ruiz JR: Host-dependent differences during synergistic infection by Potyviruses with potato virus X. Mol Plant Pathol 2004, 5: 29-35.Gonzalez-Jara P, Atencio FA, Martinez-Garcia B, Barajas D, Tenllado F, Diaz-Ruiz JR: A Single Amino Acid Mutation in the Plum pox virus Helper Component-Proteinase Gene Abolishes Both Synergistic and RNA Silencing Suppression Activities. Phytopathology 2005, 95: 894-901.Vance VB: Replication of potato virus X RNA is altered in coinfections with potato virus Y. Virology 1991, 182: 486-494.Garcia-Marcos A, Pacheco R, Martianez J, Gonzalez-Jara P, Diaz-Ruiz JR, Tenllado F: Transcriptional changes and oxidative stress associated with the synergistic interaction between Potato virus X and Potato virus Y and their relationship with symptom expression. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2009, 22: 1431-1444.Postnikova OA, Nemchinov LG: Comparative analysis of microarray data in Arabidopsis transcriptome during compatible interactions with plant viruses. Virol J 2012, 9: 101.Zanchin A, Bonghi C, Casadoro G, Ramina A, Rascio N: Cell enlargement and cell separation during peach fruit development. International Journal of Plant Science 1994, 155: 49-56.Herranz MC, Sanchez-Navarro JA, Aparicio F, Pallas V: Simultaneous detection of six stone fruit viruses by non-isotopic molecular hybridization using a unique riboprobe or ‘polyprobe’. J Virol Methods 2005, 124: 49-55.Pallas V, Mas P, Sanchez-Navarro JA: Detection of plant RNA viruses by nonisotopic dot-blot hybridization. Methods Mol Biol 1998, 81: 461-468.Lilly ST, Drummond RS, Pearson MN, MacDiarmid RM: Identification and validation of reference genes for normalization of transcripts from virus-infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2011, 24: 294-304.Cosgrove JD: Expansive growth of plant cell walls. Plant Physiol Biochem 2000,38(1–2):109-124.Tessitori M, Maria G, Capasso C, Catara G, Rizza S, De Luca V, Catara A, Capasso A, Carginale V: Differential display analysis of gene expression in Etrog citron leaves infected by Citrus viroid III. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1769: 228-235.Rizza S, Capasso C, Catara A, Capasso A, Conte E, Catara A Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists-IOCV, pp. XVII. In Transcriptional response of Troyer citrange, sour orange and alemow rootstocks to Citrus viroid IIIb (CVd-IIIb) infection. Adana, Turkey: Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists; 2010:142-149. http://www.ivia.es/iocv/Owens RA, Tech KB, Shao JY, Sano T, Baker CJ: Global analysis of tomato gene expression during Potato spindle tuber viroid infection reveals a complex array of changes affecting hormone signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012, 25: 582-598.Ogundiwin EA, Marti C, Forment J, Pons C, Granell A, Gradziel TM, Peace CP, Crisosto CH: Development of ChillPeach genomic tools and identification of cold-responsive genes in peach fruit. Plant Mol Biol 2008, 68: 379-397.Sánchez-Navarro JA FA, Rowhani A, Pallás V: Comparative analysis of ELISA, nonradioactive molecular hybridization and PCR for the detection of Prunus necrotic ringspot virus in herbaceous and prunus host. Plant Pathol 1998, 47: 780-786.Astruc N, Marcos JF, Macquaire G, Candresse T, Pallas V: Studies on the diagnosis of hop stunt viroid in fruit trees: Identification of new hosts and application of a nucleic acid extraction procedure based on non-organic solvents. Eur J Plant Pathol 1996, 102: 837-846.Myrta A, Di Terlizzi B, Pallas V, Savino V: Viruses and viroids of apricot in the Mediterranean: incidence and biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae 2006, 701: 409-417.Bouzayen M, Latché A, Nath P, Pech JC: Mechanism of fruit ripening. In Plant Developmental Biology- Biotechnological Perspectives: Volume I Edited by: Pua EC, Darvey MR. 2010, 319-339. Chapter 16Trainotti L, Bonghi C, Ziliotto F, Zanin D, Rasori A, Casadoro G, Ramina A, T P: The use of microarray mPEACH 1.0 to investigate transcriptome changes during transition from pre-climateric to climacteric phase in peach fruit. Plant Sci 2006, 170: 606-613.Lombardo VA, Osorio S, Borsani J, Lauxmann MA, Bustamante CA, Budde CO, Andreo CS, Lara MV, Fernie AR MFD: Metabolic profiling during peach fruit development and ripening reveals the metabolic networks that underpin each developmental stage. Plant Physiol 2011,157(4):1696-1710.Manganaris GA RA, Bassi D, Geuna F, Ramina A, Tonutti P, Bonghi C: Comparative transcript profiling of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit development and on-tree ripening. Tree Genet Genomes 2011, 7: 609-616.Uyemoto JK, Scott SW: Important diseases of Prunus caused by viruses and other graft-transmissible pathogens in California and South Carolina. Plant Dis 1992, 76: 5-11.Li J, Yang H, Peer WA, Richter G, Blakeslee J, Bandyopadhyay A, Titapiwantakun B, Undurraga S, Khodakovskaya M, Richards EL, et al.: Arabidopsis H+-PPase AVP1 regulates auxin-mediated organ development. Science 2005, 310: 121-125.Paponov IA, Paponov M, Teale W, Menges M, Chakrabortee S, Murray JA, Palme K: Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of auxin responses in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 2008, 1: 321-337.Padmanabhan MS, Goregaoker SP, Golem S, Shiferaw H, Culver JN: Interaction of the tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein with the Aux/IAA protein PAP1/IAA26 is associated with disease development. J Virol 2005, 79: 2549-2558.Padmanabhan MS, Shiferaw H, Culver JN: The Tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein disrupts the localization and function of interacting Aux/IAA proteins. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19: 864-873.Padmanabhan MS, Kramer SR, Wang X, Culver JN: Tobacco mosaic virus replicase-auxin/indole acetic acid protein interactions: reprogramming the auxin response pathway to enhance virus infection. J Virol 2008, 82: 2477-2485.Kuhn JM, Boisson-Dernier A, Dizon MB, Maktabi MH, Schroeder JI: The protein phosphatase AtPP2CA negatively regulates abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis, and effects of abh1 on AtPP2CA mRNA. Plant Physiol 2006, 140: 127-139.Whenham RJ, Fraser RSS, Brown LP, Payne JA: Tobacco-mosaic-virus-induced increase in abscisic-acid concentration in tobacco leaves: Intracellular location in light and dark-green areas, and relationship to symptom development. Planta 1986, 168: 592-598.Bari R, Jones JD: Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 2009, 69: 473-488.Kotchoni SO, Kuhns C, Ditzer A, Kirch HH, Bartels D: Over-expression of different aldehyde dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to abiotic stress and protects plants against lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ 2006, 29: 1033-1048.Mowla SB, Cuypers A, Driscoll SP, Kiddle G, Thomson J, Foyer CH, Theodoulou FL: Yeast complementation reveals a role for an Arabidopsis thaliana late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)-like protein in oxidative stress tolerance. Plant J 2006, 48: 743-756.Amari K, Diaz-Vivancos P, Pallas V, Sanchez-Pina MA, Hernandez JA: Oxidative stress induction by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus infection in apricot seeds. Physiol Plant 2007, 131: 302-310.Gilroy EM, Hein I, van der Hoorn R, Boevink PC, Venter E, McLellan H, Kaffarnik F, Hrubikova K, Shaw J, Holeva M, et al.: Involvement of cathepsin B in the plant disease resistance hypersensitive response. Plant J 2007, 52: 1-13.Kruger J, Thomas CM, Golstein C, Dixon MS, Smoker M, Tang S, Mulder L, Jones JD: A tomato cysteine protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance and suppression of autonecrosis. Science 2002, 296: 744-747.Bernoux M, Timmers T, Jauneau A, Briere C, De Wit PJ, Marco Y, Deslandes L: RD19, an Arabidopsis cysteine protease required for RRS1-R-mediated resistance, is relocalized to the nucleus by the Ralstonia solanacearum PopP2 effector. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 2252-2264.Shabab M, Shindo T, Gu C, Kaschani F, Pansuriya T, Chintha R, Harzen A, Colby T, Kamoun S, van der Hoorn RA: Fungal effector protein AVR2 targets diversifying defense-related cys proteases of tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 1169-1183.Van Esse HP, Van’t Klooster JW, Bolton MD, Yadeta KA, Van Baarlen P, Boeren S, Vervoort J, De Wit PJ, Thomma BP: The Cladosporium fulvum virulence protein Avr2 inhibits host proteases required for basal defense. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 1948-1963.Song J, Win J, Tian M, Schornack S, Kaschani F, Ilyas M, van der Hoorn RA, Kamoun S: Apoplastic effectors secreted by two unrelated eukaryotic plant pathogens target the tomato defense protease Rcr3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106: 1654-1659.Tian M, Win J, Song J, van der Hoorn R, van der Knaap E, Kamoun S: A Phytophthora infestans cystatin-like protein targets a novel tomato papain-like apoplastic protease. Plant Physiol 2007, 143: 364-377.Rooney H, Van’t Klooster J, Van der Hoorn R, Joosten M, Jones J: Cladosporium Avr2 inhibits tomato Rcr3 protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance. Science 2005, 308: 1783-1786.Auger AJ: Tomato ringspot virus associated with brownline disease on prune trees in Chile. Acta Horticulturae 1989, 235: 197-204.Herrera G: Enfermedades causadas por virus en frutales en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Investigación Agropecuaria; 2001. Boletín INIA N°52. 65pFiore N, Abou Ghanem-Sabanadzovic N, Infante R, Myrta A, Pallás V: Detection of Peach latent mosaic viroid in stone fruits from Chile. In Option Méditerranéennes, Sér. B/n°45 –Virus ad virus-like disease of stone fruits, with particular reference to the Mediterranean region Edited by: Myrta A, Di Terlizzi B, Savino V. 2003, 143-145.Torres H, Gómez G, Pallás V, Stamo B, Shalaby A, Aouane B, Gavriel I, Kominek P, Caglayan K, Sipahioglu M, et al.: Detection by tissue printing of stone fruit viroids, from europe, the mediterranean and north and south America. Acta Horticulturae 2004, 657: 379-383.Peiró A, Pallás V, Sánchez-Navarro JA: Simultaneous detection of eight viruses and two viroids affecting stone fruit trees by using a unique polyprobe. Eur J Plant Pathol 2012,132(4):469-475.Meisel L, Fonseca B, Gonzalez S, Baeza-Yates R, Cambiazo V, Campos R, Gonzalez M, Orellana A, Retamales J, Silva H: A rapid and efficient method for purifying high quality total RNA from peaches (Prunus persica) for functional genomics analyses. Biol Res 2005, 38: 83-88.Van Gelder RN, Von Zastrow ME, Yool A, Dement WC, Barchas JD JHE: Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990,87(5):1663-1667.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 5116-5121.Sanchez-Navarro JA, Canizares MC, Cano EA, Pallas V: Simultaneous detection of five carnation viruses by non-isotopic molecular hybridization. J Virol Methods 1999, 82: 167-175

EAR motif-mediated transcriptional repression in plants: An underlying mechanism for epigenetic regulation of gene expression

Ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif-mediated transcriptional repression is emerging as one of the principal mechanisms of plant gene regulation. The EAR motif, defined by the consensus sequence patterns of either LxLxL or DLN xxP, is the most predominant form of transcriptional repression motif so far identified in plants. Additionally, this active repression motif is highly conserved in transcriptional regulators known to function as negative regulators in a broad range of developmental and physiological processes across evolutionarily diverse plant species. Recent discoveries of co-repressors interacting with EAR motifs, such as TO PLESS (TPL) and AtSA P18, have begun to unravel the mechanisms of EAR motif-mediated repression. The demonstration of genetic interaction between mutants of TPL and AtHDA 19, co-complex formation between TPL-related 1 (TPR1) and AtHDA 19, as well as direct physical interaction between AtSA P18 and AtHDA 19 support a model where EAR repressors, via recruitment of chromatin remodeling factors, facilitate epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Here, we discuss the biological significance of EAR -mediated gene regulation in the broader context of plant biology and present literature evidence in support of a model for EAR motif-mediated repression via the recruitment and action of chromatin modifiers. Additionally, we discuss the possible influences of phosphorylation and ubiquitination on the function and turnover of EAR repressors