34 research outputs found
Assessment of variation in the alberta context tool: the contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings
Background: There are few validated measures of organizational context and none that we located are
parsimonious and address modifiable characteristics of context. The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) was developed to
meet this need. The instrument assesses 8 dimensions of context, which comprise 10 concepts. The purpose of
this paper is to report evidence to further the validity argument for ACT. The specific objectives of this paper are
to: (1) examine the extent to which the 10 ACT concepts discriminate between patient care units and (2) identify
variables that significantly contribute to between-unit variation for each of the 10 concepts.
Methods: 859 professional nurses (844 valid responses) working in medical, surgical and critical care units of 8
Canadian pediatric hospitals completed the ACT. A random intercept, fixed effects hierarchical linear modeling
(HLM) strategy was used to quantify and explain variance in the 10 ACT concepts to establish the ACTâs ability to
discriminate between units. We ran 40 models (a series of 4 models for each of the 10 concepts) in which we
systematically assessed the unique contribution (i.e., error variance reduction) of different variables to between-unit
variation. First, we constructed a null model in which we quantified the variance overall, in each of the concepts.
Then we controlled for the contribution of individual level variables (Model 1). In Model 2, we assessed the
contribution of practice specialty (medical, surgical, critical care) to variation since it was central to construction of
the sampling frame for the study. Finally, we assessed the contribution of additional unit level variables (Model 3).
Results: The null model (unadjusted baseline HLM model) established that there was significant variation between
units in each of the 10 ACT concepts (i.e., discrimination between units). When we controlled for individual
characteristics, significant variation in the 10 concepts remained. Assessment of the contribution of specialty to
between-unit variation enabled us to explain more variance (1.19% to 16.73%) in 6 of the 10 ACT concepts. Finally,
when we assessed the unique contribution of the unit level variables available to us, we were able to explain
additional variance (15.91% to 73.25%) in 7 of the 10 ACT concepts.
Conclusion: The findings reported here represent the third published argument for validity of the ACT and adds
to the evidence supporting its use to discriminate patient care units by all 10 contextual factors. We found
evidence of relationships between a variety of individual and unit-level variables that explained much of this
between-unit variation for each of the 10 ACT concepts. Future research will include examination of the
relationships between the ACTâs contextual factors and research utilization by nurses and ultimately the
relationships between context, research utilization, and outcomes for patients
Clinical outcomes and risk factors for COVID-19 among migrant populations in high-income countries: a systematic review.
Background: Migrants in high-income countries may be at increased risk of COVID-19 due to their health and social circumstances, yet the extent to which they are affected and their predisposing risk factors are not clearly understood. We did a systematic review to assess clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in migrant populations, indirect health and social impacts, and to determine key risk factors. Methods: We did a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42020222135). We searched multiple databases to 18/11/2020 for peer-reviewed and grey literature on migrants (foreign-born) and COVID-19 in 82 high-income countries. We used our international networks to source national datasets and grey literature. Data were extracted on primary outcomes (cases, hospitalisations, deaths) and we evaluated secondary outcomes on indirect health and social impacts and risk factors using narrative synthesis. Results: 3016 data sources were screened with 158 from 15 countries included in the analysis (35 data sources for primary outcomes: cases [21], hospitalisations [4]; deaths [15]; 123 for secondary outcomes). We found that migrants are at increased risk of infection and are disproportionately represented among COVID-19 cases. Available datasets suggest a similarly disproportionate representation of migrants in reported COVID-19 deaths, as well as increased all-cause mortality in migrants in some countries in 2020. Undocumented migrants, migrant health and care workers, and migrants housed in camps have been especially affected. Migrants experience risk factors including high-risk occupations, overcrowded accommodation, and barriers to healthcare including inadequate information, language barriers, and reduced entitlement. Conclusions: Migrants in high-income countries are at high risk of exposure to, and infection with, COVID-19. These data are of immediate relevance to national public health and policy responses to the pandemic. Robust data on testing uptake and clinical outcomes in migrants, and barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination, are urgently needed, alongside strengthening engagement with diverse migrant groups
Promoting the use of Single-Case Designs: Social Work Experiences from England and Finland.
The main contribution of this article is to critically analyze the use of single-case evaluation by social work practitioners in Finland and England and to assist in the development of this methodology in practice. We examine the experiences from both countries where attempts were made by academic researchers to encourage social workers to use single-case designs in the evaluation of their practice. The interventions used by the researchers in the universities at Tampere in Finland and Huddersfield in England to promote the use of single-case evaluation by practitioners are described in detail to enable replication and to develop the potential to learn from the interventions used by others. </jats:p