169 research outputs found

    Book Reviews

    Get PDF

    Exploring viscosity space in an eddy‐permitting global ocean model: Is viscosity a useful control for numerical mixing?

    Get PDF
    A generic shortcoming of constant-depth (or “z-coordinate”) ocean models such as MOM5 and Nucleus for European Models of the Ocean (NEMO) is a tendency for the advection scheme to produce unphysical numerical diapycnal mixing, which may exceed the explicitly parameterized mixing based on observed physical processes. Megann (2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.11.001) estimated the effective diapycnal diffusivity in the Global Ocean Version 5.0 (GO5.0) 0.25° global implementation of the NEMO model and showed that this was up to 10 times the explicit diffusivity used in the model's mixing scheme and argued that this was at least partly caused by large transient vertical velocities on length scales comparable to the horizontal grid scale. The current UK global NEMO configuration GO6, as used in the Global Coupled Model version 3.1 (GC3.1) and UK Earth System Model (UKESM1), is integrated in forced mode at 0.25° resolution with a range of viscosity parameterizations. In the present study, the effective diffusivity is evaluated for each integration and compared with the explicit value from the model mixing scheme, as well as with that in the control (using the default viscosity). It is shown that there is a strong correspondence between lower viscosity and enhanced numerical mixing and that larger viscosities lead to a marked reduction in the unrealistic internal temperature drift seen in the control configuration, without incurring excessive damping of the large-scale circulation, mixed layer depths, or sea ice cover. The results presented here will inform the choices made in global ocean configurations used in climate and Earth System models following the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)

    Pan-Arctic simulation of coupled nutrient-sulfur cycling due to sea ice biology:Preliminary results

    Get PDF
    A dynamic model is constructed for interactive silicon, nitrogen, sulfur processing in and below Arctic sea ice, by ecosystems residing in the lower few centimeters of the distributed pack. A biogeochemically active bottom layer supporting sources/sinks for the pennate diatoms is appended to thickness categories of a global sea ice code. Nutrients transfer from the ocean mixed layer to drive algal growth, while sulfur metabolites are reinjected from the ice interface. Freeze, flux, flush and melt processes are linked to multielement geocycling for the entire high-latitude regime. Major element kinetics are optimized initially to reproduce chlorophyll observations, which extend across the seasons. Principal influences on biomass are solute exchange velocity at the solid interface, optical averaging in active ice and cell retention against ablation. The sulfur mechanism encompasses open water features such as accumulation of particulate dimethyl sulfoniopropionate, grazing and other disruptive releases, plus bacterial/enzymatic conversion to volatile dimethyl sulfide. For baseline settings, the mixed layer trace gas distribution matches sparging measurements where they are available. However, concentrations rise to well over 10 nM in remote, unsampled locations. Peak contributions are supported by ice grazing, mortality and fractional melting. The model bottom layer adds substantially to a ring maximum of reduced sulfur chemistry that may be dominant across the marginal Arctic environment. Sensitivity tests on this scenario include variation of cell sulfur composition and remineralization, routings/chemical time scales, and the physical dimension of water layers. An alternate possibility that peripheral additions are small cannot be excluded from the outcomes. It is concluded that seagoing dimethyl sulfide data are far too sparse at the present time to distinguish sulfur-ice production levels. Citation: Elliott, S., C. Deal, G. Humphries, E. Hunke, N. Jeffery, M. Jin, M. Levasseur, and J. Stefels (2012), Pan-Arctic simulation of coupled nutrient-sulfur cycling due to sea ice biology: Preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res., 117, G01016, doi:10.1029/2011JG001649

    Sea level variability in the Arctic Ocean from AOMIP models

    Get PDF
    Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2007. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 112 (2007): C04S08, doi:10.1029/2006JC003916.Monthly sea levels from five Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (AOMIP) models are analyzed and validated against observations in the Arctic Ocean. The AOMIP models are able to simulate variability of sea level reasonably well, but several improvements are needed to reduce model errors. It is suggested that the models will improve if their domains have a minimum depth less than 10 m. It is also recommended to take into account forcing associated with atmospheric loading, fast ice, and volume water fluxes representing Bering Strait inflow and river runoff. Several aspects of sea level variability in the Arctic Ocean are investigated based on updated observed sea level time series. The observed rate of sea level rise corrected for the glacial isostatic adjustment at 9 stations in the Kara, Laptev, and East Siberian seas for 1954–2006 is estimated as 0.250 cm/yr. There is a well pronounced decadal variability in the observed sea level time series. The 5-year running mean sea level signal correlates well with the annual Arctic Oscillation (AO) index and the sea level atmospheric pressure (SLP) at coastal stations and the North Pole. For 1954–2000 all model results reflect this correlation very well, indicating that the long-term model forcing and model reaction to the forcing are correct. Consistent with the influences of AO-driven processes, the sea level in the Arctic Ocean dropped significantly after 1990 and increased after the circulation regime changed from cyclonic to anticyclonic in 1997. In contrast, from 2000 to 2006 the sea level rose despite the stabilization of the AO index at its lowest values after 2000.This research is supported by the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (under cooperative agreements OPP- 0002239 and OPP- 0327664) with the International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, and by the Climate Change Prediction Program of the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research. The development of the UW model is also supported by NASA grants NNG04GB03G and NNG04GH52G and NSF grants OPP-0240916 and OPP-0229429

    Intensification of summer precipitation with shorter time-scales in Europe

    Get PDF
    While daily extreme precipitation intensities increase with global warming on average at approximately the same rate as the availability of water vapor (~7%/°C), a debated topic is whether sub-daily extremes increase more. Modelling at convection-permitting scales has been deemed necessary to reproduce extreme summer precipitation at local scale. Here we analyze multi-model ensembles and apply a 3 km horizontal resolution model over four regions across Europe (S. Norway, Denmark, Benelux and Albania) and find very good agreement with observed daily and hourly summer precipitation extremes. Projections show that daily extreme precipitation intensifies compared to the mean in all regions and across a wide range of models and resolutions. Hourly and 10 min extremes intensify at a higher rate in nearly all regions. Unlike most recent studies, we do not find sub-daily precipitation extremes increasing much more than 7%/°C, even for sub-hourly extremes, but this may be due to robust summer drying over large parts of Europe. However, the absolute strongest local daily precipitation event in a 20 year period will increase by 10%–20%/°C. At the same time, model projections strongly indicate that summer drying will be more pronounced for extremely dry years

    Towards quantifying the increasing role of oceanic heat in sea ice loss in the new Arctic

    Get PDF
    The loss of Arctic sea ice has emerged as a leading signal of global warming. This, together with acknowledged impacts on other components of the Earth system, has led to the term “the new Arctic.” Global coupled climate models predict that ice loss will continue through the twenty-first century, with implications for governance, economics, security, and global weather. A wide range in model projections reflects the complex, highly coupled interactions between the polar atmosphere, ocean, and cryosphere, including teleconnections to lower latitudes. This paper summarizes our present understanding of how heat reaches the ice base from the original sources—inflows of Atlantic and Pacific Water, river discharge, and summer sensible heat and shortwave radiative fluxes at the ocean/ice surface—and speculates on how such processes may change in the new Arctic. The complexity of the coupled Arctic system, and the logistic and technological challenges of working in the Arctic Ocean, require a coordinated interdisciplinary and international program that will not only improve understanding of this critical component of global climate but will also provide opportunities to develop human resources with the skills required to tackle related problems in complex climate systems. We propose a research strategy with components that include 1) improved mapping of the upper- and middepth Arctic Ocean, 2) enhanced quantification of important process, 3) expanded long-term monitoring at key heat-flux locations, and 4) development of numerical capabilities that focus on parameterization of heat-flux mechanisms and their interactions.publishedVersio

    Toward quantifying the increasing role oceanic heat in sea ice loss in the new Arctic

    Get PDF
    Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2015. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 96 (2015): 2079–2105, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00177.1.The loss of Arctic sea ice has emerged as a leading signal of global warming. This, together with acknowledged impacts on other components of the Earth system, has led to the term “the new Arctic.” Global coupled climate models predict that ice loss will continue through the twenty-first century, with implications for governance, economics, security, and global weather. A wide range in model projections reflects the complex, highly coupled interactions between the polar atmosphere, ocean, and cryosphere, including teleconnections to lower latitudes. This paper summarizes our present understanding of how heat reaches the ice base from the original sources—inflows of Atlantic and Pacific Water, river discharge, and summer sensible heat and shortwave radiative fluxes at the ocean/ice surface—and speculates on how such processes may change in the new Arctic. The complexity of the coupled Arctic system, and the logistic and technological challenges of working in the Arctic Ocean, require a coordinated interdisciplinary and international program that will not only improve understanding of this critical component of global climate but will also provide opportunities to develop human resources with the skills required to tackle related problems in complex climate systems. We propose a research strategy with components that include 1) improved mapping of the upper- and middepth Arctic Ocean, 2) enhanced quantification of important process, 3) expanded long-term monitoring at key heat-flux locations, and 4) development of numerical capabilities that focus on parameterization of heat-flux mechanisms and their interactions.2016-06-0
    corecore