Natural resource or market seeking motive of China’s FDI in asia? New evidence at income and sub-regional level

Asia is a heterogeneous region including countries with distinct features in quite a few facets. This study is designed to unravel the motivations of Chinese FDI in 30 Asian countries (For list of countries see Appendix 1.) during 2003–2016. For estimation, we utilised the Random effect (RE), Fixed effect (FE) and System-GMM (SGMM) methodologies. We transpired that both market and natural resource (mineral richness) seeking motives of Chinese FDI in the whole sample analysis. With respect to income group, we confirmed the market seeking FDI in both high and middle- income countries whereas, mineral richness is priority for Chinese FDI in middle-income group. Thus, Chinese firms targeted middle income developing economies to acquire non-fuel natural resources. Analogously, on the regional basis, the results show that in all regression models, GDP is positive and significant predictor, characterising market seeking FDI by Chinese firms in West, East and South East Asia. In resource seeking motive, among the two types of natural resources, mineral richness affect Chinese FDI positively in East & South East Asia. In a nutshell, seeking market is the common motive for Chinese FDI in the entire sample, whereas the resource seeking motive varies across the income groups and regions

Machine Learning Modeling and Insights into the Structural Characteristics of Drug-Induced Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity can be resulted from many diverse clinical drugs, which has been a cause of concern to human populations across the world. The detection of drug-induced neurotoxicity (DINeurot) potential with biological experimental methods always required a lot of budget and time. In addition, few studies have addressed the structural characteristics of neurotoxic chemicals. In this study, we focused on the computational modeling for drug-induced neurotoxicity with machine learning methods and the insights into the structural characteristics of neurotoxic chemicals. Based on the clinical drug data with neurotoxicity effects, we developed 35 different classifiers by combining five different machine learning methods and seven fingerprint packages. The best-performing model achieved good results on both 5-fold cross-validation (balanced accuracy of 76.51%, AUC value of 0.83, and MCC value of 0.52) and external validation (balanced accuracy of 83.63%, AUC value of 0.87, and MCC value of 0.67). The model can be freely accessed on the web server DINeuroTpredictor (http://dineurot.sapredictor.cn/). We also analyzed the distribution of several key molecular properties between neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic structures. The results indicated that several physicochemical properties were significantly different between the neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic compounds, including molecular polar surface area (MPSA), AlogP, the number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nHAcc) and donors (nHDon), the number of rotatable bonds (nRotB), and the number of aromatic rings (nAR). In addition, 18 structural alerts responsible for chemical neurotoxicity were identified. The structural alerts have been integrated with our web server SApredictor (http://www.sapredictor.cn). The results of this study could provide useful information for the understanding of the structural characteristics and computational prediction for chemical neurotoxicity

Machine Learning Modeling and Insights into the Structural Characteristics of Drug-Induced Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity can be resulted from many diverse clinical drugs, which has been a cause of concern to human populations across the world. The detection of drug-induced neurotoxicity (DINeurot) potential with biological experimental methods always required a lot of budget and time. In addition, few studies have addressed the structural characteristics of neurotoxic chemicals. In this study, we focused on the computational modeling for drug-induced neurotoxicity with machine learning methods and the insights into the structural characteristics of neurotoxic chemicals. Based on the clinical drug data with neurotoxicity effects, we developed 35 different classifiers by combining five different machine learning methods and seven fingerprint packages. The best-performing model achieved good results on both 5-fold cross-validation (balanced accuracy of 76.51%, AUC value of 0.83, and MCC value of 0.52) and external validation (balanced accuracy of 83.63%, AUC value of 0.87, and MCC value of 0.67). The model can be freely accessed on the web server DINeuroTpredictor (http://dineurot.sapredictor.cn/). We also analyzed the distribution of several key molecular properties between neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic structures. The results indicated that several physicochemical properties were significantly different between the neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic compounds, including molecular polar surface area (MPSA), AlogP, the number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nHAcc) and donors (nHDon), the number of rotatable bonds (nRotB), and the number of aromatic rings (nAR). In addition, 18 structural alerts responsible for chemical neurotoxicity were identified. The structural alerts have been integrated with our web server SApredictor (http://www.sapredictor.cn). The results of this study could provide useful information for the understanding of the structural characteristics and computational prediction for chemical neurotoxicity