17 research outputs found

    Infection par Wolbachia : De passagÚres à résidentes

    No full text
    International audienceWolbachia are endosymbiotic alpha-proteobacteria. harboured by terrestrial arthropods and filarial nematodes, where they are maternally transmitted through egg cytoplasm. According to the host group, Wolbachia have developed two contrasting symbiotic strategies. In arthropods, symbiosis is secondary (i.e. facultative), and Wolbachia insure their transmission as reproduction parasites. However, despite of the efficiency of the manipulation mechanisms used, Wolbachia are limited to the state of passenger because some factors can prevent the association between Wolbachia and their hosts to become permanent. On the contrary, symbiosis is primary (i.e. obligatory) in filarial nematodes where Wolbachia insure their transmission via a mutualistic relationship, leading them to become permanent residents of their hosts. However, a few examples show that in arthropods too some Wolbachia have started to present the first stages of a mutualistic behaviour, or are even truly indispensable to their host. Whatever its strategy, Wolbachia infection is a spectacular evolutionary success, this symbiotic bacterium representing one of the most important biomass of its kind

    Wolbachia and recombination

    No full text
    International audienc

    Wolbachia Transfer from Rhagoletis cerasi to Drosophila simulans: Investigating the Outcomes of Host-Symbiont Coevolution

    No full text
    Wolbachia is an endosymbiont of diverse arthropod lineages that can induce various alterations of host reproduction for its own benefice. Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common phenomenon, which results in embryonic lethality when males that bear Wolbachia are mated with females that do not. In the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi, Wolbachia seems to be responsible for previously reported patterns of incompatibility between populations. Here we report on the artificial transfer of two Wolbachia variants (wCer1 and wCer2) from R. cerasi into Drosophila simulans, which was performed with two major goals in mind: first, to isolate wCer1 from wCer2 in order to individually test their respective abilities to induce CI in the new host; and, second, to test the theoretical prediction that recent Wolbachia-host associations should be characterized by high levels of CI, fitness costs to the new host, and inefficient transmission from mothers to offspring. wCer1 was unable to develop in the new host, resulting in its rapid loss after successful injection, while wCer2 was established in the new host. Transmission rates of wCer2 were low, and the infection showed negative fitness effects, consistent with our prediction, but CI levels were unexpectedly lower in the new host. Based on these parameter estimates, neither wCer1 nor wCer2 could be naturally maintained in D. simulans. The experiment thus suggests that natural Wolbachia transfer between species might be restricted by many factors, should the ecological barriers be bypassed

    Exploring the Evolution of Wolbachia Compatibility Types: A Simulation Approach

    No full text
    Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is observed when males bearing the bacterium mate with uninfected females or with females bearing a different Wolbachia variant; in such crosses, paternal chromosomes are lost at the first embryonic mitosis, most often resulting in developmental arrest. The molecular basis of CI is currently unknown, but it is useful to distinguish conceptually the male and female sides of this phenomenon: in males, Wolbachia must do something, before it is shed from maturing sperm, that will disrupt paternal chromosomes functionality [this is usually termed “the modification (mod) function”]; in females, Wolbachia must somehow restore embryonic viability, through what is usually called “the rescue (resc) function.” The occurrence of CI in crosses between males and females bearing different Wolbachia variants demonstrates that the mod and resc functions interact in a specific manner: different mod resc pairs make different compatibility types. We are interested in the evolutionary process allowing the diversification of compatibility types. In an earlier model, based on the main assumption that the mod and resc functions can mutate independently, we have shown that compatibility types can evolve through a two-step process, the first involving drift on mod variations and the second involving selection on resc variations. This previous study has highlighted the need for simulation-based models that would include the effects of nondeterministic evolutionary forces. This study is based on a simulation program fulfilling this condition, allowing us to follow the evolution of compatibility types under mutation, drift, and selection. Most importantly, simulations suggest that in the frame of our model, the evolution of compatibility types is likely to be a gradual process, with new compatibility types remaining partially compatible with ancestral ones

    Natural Wolbachia infections in the Drosophila yakuba species complex do not induce cytoplasmic incompatibility but fully rescue the wRi modification.

    No full text
    In this study, we report data about the presence of Wolbachia in Drosophila yakuba, D. teissieri, and D. santomea. Wolbachia strains were characterized using their wsp gene sequence and cytoplasmic incompatibility assays. All three species were found infected with Wolbachia bacteria closely related to the wAu strain, found so far in D. simulans natural populations, and were unable to induce cytoplasmic incompatibility. We injected wRi, a CI-inducing strain naturally infecting D. simulans, into the three species and the established transinfected lines exhibited high levels of CI, suggesting that absence of CI expression is a property of the Wolbachia strain naturally present or that CI is specifically repressed by the host. We also tested the relationship between the natural infection and wRi and found that it fully rescues the wRi modification. This result was unexpected, considering the significant evolutionary divergence between the two Wolbachia strains

    Stop codons in <i>gatB</i>, <i>coxA</i>, and <i>ftsZ</i> of <i>w</i>Cer1 and <i>w</i>Cer2 <i>Wolbachia</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Lane three lists the position of the mutation corresponding to the size of the amplified MLST-gene fragment. Lines F37 to F42 represent <i>R. cerasi</i> individuals from different populations sampled in Sicily, Italy.</p

    Variable nucleotide positions in <i>gatB</i> (A) and amino acid positions in GATB (B) of <i>w</i>Cer2.

    No full text
    <p><b>A</b>) Position 1 in the presented 404 bp fragment corresponds to position 981 of the full <i>gatB</i> locus of <i>w</i>Ri infecting <i>Drosophila simulans</i> Riverside (GenBank accession number CP001391). Aa position 1 in (<b>B</b>) corresponds to aa position 148 of the full GATB protein of <i>w</i>Ri (protein ID:ACN94961.1). Frequency of SNP indicates which SNPs are singletons or occur recurrently in what host system. Nonsense mutations leading to a stop codon are indicated by asterisks. Abbreviations: aa amino acid.(</p
    corecore