Comparative antibacterial potential of selected aldehyde-based biocides and surfactants against planktonic Pseudomonas fluorescens

The antimicrobial efficacy of two aldehydebased biocides (glutaraldehyde, GTA, and orthophthalaldehyde, OPA) and two surfactants (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, CTAB, and sodium dodecyl sulphate, SDS) was tested against planktonic Pseudomonas fluorescens. The antimicrobial effects were evaluated by respiratory activity as a measure of the oxygen uptake rate, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release, outer membrane proteins (OMP) expression and cellular colour changes. The results were compared with the bacterial characteristics without chemical treatment. Tests in the presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA), in order to mimic a disinfection process in the real situation under dirty conditions, were performed according to the European Standard EN-1276. P. fluorescens was completely inactivated with OPA (minimum bactericidal concentration, MBC = 0.5 mM) and CTAB (MBC = 5 mM) and was resistant to GTA and SDS. Only CTAB promoted cellular disruption and consequent ATP release. The antimicrobial action of the chemicals tested was significantly reduced when BSA was introduced into the bacterial cultures, increasing markedly the MBC values. Additionally, the presence of BSA acted as a disruption protective agent when CTAB was applied and stimulated the bacterial respiratory activity when lower concentrations of SDS were tested. The OMP of the bacterial cells was affected by the application of both surfactants. OMP expression remained unaltered after biocide treatment. Bacterial colour change was noticed after treatment with biocides and surfactants. In summary, P. fluorescens was extremely resistant to GTA and SDS, with antimicrobial action being quenched markedly by the reaction with BSA.Instituto de Biotecnologia e Química Fina (IBQF).Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) - (Project CHEMBIO - POCI/BIO/61872/2004

A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

Meeting abstrac

Comparative Effectiveness Research in Localized Prostate Cancer : A 10-Year Follow-up Cohort Study

Altres ajuts: Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).Purpose: Long-term comparative effectiveness research on localized prostate cancer treatments is scarce, and evidence is lacking especially for brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term impact of the side effects of radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and external radiation therapy on patients with localized prostate cancer at 10 years, using propensity score analyses. Methods and Materials: This was a prospective observational study of a cohort of men who received a diagnosis of clinically localized prostate cancer (clinical stage T1 or T2, low and intermediate risk group) and were treated with radical prostatectomy (n = 139), brachytherapy (n = 317), or external radiation therapy (n = 194). Treatment decisions were jointly made by patients and physicians. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) evaluation included the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Short Form-36, administered centrally by telephone interviews before and annually after treatment. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite covers urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. To assess PRO changes over time, while accounting for correlation among repeated measures, generalized estimating equation models adjusted by propensity scores were constructed. Results: The PRO completion rate at 10 years was 85.8%. Generalized estimating equation models showed that the pattern of radical prostatectomy side effects, with substantial urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, remained until 10 years after treatment (standard deviation [SD], -1.1 and -1.3, respectively). Brachytherapy produced late deterioration in urinary continence (SD, -0.4) and sexual function (SD, -0.9) that appeared midterm, but the differences from radical prostatectomy remained statistically significant at 10 years (P <.001 after adjusting by propensity score). External radiation therapy showed similar results to brachytherapy, but with bowel bother (SD, -0.3). Conclusions: Although late deterioration in radiation therapy groups attenuated differences from radical prostatectomy, relevant PRO differences still remained after 10 years. Our findings support that brachytherapy is the treatment option that causes the least impact on PROs; it is therefore an alternative to be considered when making evidence-based decisions on localized prostate cancer treatment