Healthcare trajectories before and after critical illness: population-based insight on diverse patients clusters

International audienceBackground: The post intensive care syndrome (PICS) gathers various disabilities, associated with a substantial healthcare use. However, patients' comorbidities and active medical conditions prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission may partly drive healthcare use after ICU discharge. To better understand retative contribution of critical illness and PICS-compared to pre-existing comorbidities-as potential determinant of post-critical illness healthcare use, we conducted a population-based evaluation of patients' healthcare use trajectories.Results: Using discharge databases in a 2.5-million-people region in France, we retrieved, over 3 years, all adult patients admitted in ICU for septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), intubated at least 5 days and discharged alive from hospital: 882 patients were included. Median duration of mechanical ventilation was 11 days (interquartile ranges [IQR] 8;20), mean SAPS2 was 49, and median hospital length of stay was 42 days (IQR 29;64). Healthcare use (days spent in healthcare facilities) was analyzed 2 years before and 2 years after ICU admission. Prior to ICU admission, we observed, at the scale of the whole study population, a progressive increase in healthcare use. Healthcare trajectories were then explored at individual level, and patients were assembled according to their individual pre-ICU healthcare use trajectory by clusterization with the K-Means method. Interestingly, this revealed diverse trajectories, identifying patients with elevated and increasing healthcare use (n = 126), and two main groups with low (n = 476) or no (n = 251) pre-ICU healthcare use. In ICU, however, SAPS2, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay were not different across the groups. Analysis of post-ICU healthcare trajectories for each group revealed that patients with low or no pre-ICU healthcare (which represented 83% of the population) switched to a persistent and elevated healthcare use during the 2 years post-ICU.Conclusion: For 83% of ARDS/septic shock survivors, critical illness appears to have a pivotal role in healthcare trajectories, with a switch from a low and stable healthcare use prior to ICU to a sustained higher healthcare recourse 2 years after ICU discharge. This underpins the hypothesis of long-term critical illness and PICS-related quantifiable consequences in healthcare use, measurable at a population level

Performance of AI-Based Automated Classifications of Whole-Body FDG PET in Clinical Practice: The CLARITI Project

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of a three-dimensional deep convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) for the general triage of whole-body FDG PET in daily clinical practice. Methods: An institutional clinical data warehouse working environment was devoted to this PET imaging purpose. Dedicated request procedures and data processing workflows were specifically developed within this infrastructure and applied retrospectively to a monocentric dataset as a proof of concept. A custom-made 3D-CNN was first trained and tested on an “unambiguous” well-balanced data sample, which included strictly normal and highly pathological scans. For the training phase, 90% of the data sample was used (learning set: 80%; validation set: 20%, 5-fold cross validation) and the remaining 10% constituted the test set. Finally, the model was applied to a “real-life” test set which included any scans taken. Text mining of the PET reports systematically combined with visual rechecking by an experienced reader served as the standard-of-truth for PET labeling. Results: From 8125 scans, 4963 PETs had processable cross-matched medical reports. For the “unambiguous” dataset (1084 PETs), the 3D-CNN’s overall results for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were 84%, 98%, 98%, 85%, 42.0 and 0.16, respectively (F1 score of 90%). When applied to the “real-life” dataset (4963 PETs), the sensitivity, NPV, LR+, LR− and F1 score substantially decreased (61%, 40%, 2.97, 0.49 and 73%, respectively), whereas the specificity and PPV remained high (79% and 90%). Conclusion: An AI-based triage of whole-body FDG PET is promising. Further studies are needed to overcome the challenges presented by the imperfection of real-life PET data

Hybrid Approaches for our Participation to the n2c2 Challenge on Cohort Selection for Clinical Trials

15 pagesObjective: Natural language processing can help minimize human intervention in identifying patients meeting eligibility criteria for clinical trials, but there is still a long way to go to obtain a general and systematic approach that is useful for researchers. We describe two methods taking a step in this direction and present their results obtained during the n2c2 challenge on cohort selection for clinical trials. Materials and Methods: The first method is a weakly supervised method using an unlabeled corpus (MIMIC) to build a silver standard, by producing semi-automatically a small and very precise set of rules to detect some samples of positive and negative patients. This silver standard is then used to train a traditional supervised model. The second method is a terminology-based approach where a medical expert selects the appropriate concepts, and a procedure is defined to search the terms and check the structural or temporal constraints. Results: On the n2c2 dataset containing annotated data about 13 selection criteria on 288 patients, we obtained an overall F1-measure of 0.8969, which is the third best result out of 45 participant teams, with no statistically significant difference with the best-ranked team. Discussion: Both approaches obtained very encouraging results and apply to different types of criteria. The weakly supervised method requires explicit descriptions of positive and negative examples in some reports. The terminology-based method is very efficient when medical concepts carry most of the relevant information. Conclusion: It is unlikely that much more annotated data will be soon available for the task of identifying a wide range of patient phenotypes. One must focus on weakly or non-supervised learning methods using both structured and unstructured data and relying on a comprehensive representation of the patients

AP-HP Health Data Space (AHDS) to the Test of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Sharing observational and interventional health data within a common data space enables university hospitals to leverage such data for biomedical discovery and moving towards a learning health system. Objective: To describe the AP-HP Health Data Space (AHDS) and the IT services supporting piloting, research, innovation and patient care. Methods: Built on three pillars – governance and ethics, technology and valorization – the AHDS and its major component, the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) have been developed since 2015. Results: The AP-HP CDW has been made available at scale to AP-HP both healthcare professionals and public or private partners in January 2017. Supported by an institutional secured and high-performance cloud and an ecosystem of tools, mostly open source, the AHDS integrates a large amount of massive healthcare data collected during care and research activities. As of December 2021, the AHDS operates the electronic data capture for almost +840 clinical trials sponsored by AP-HP, the CDW is enabling the processing of health data from more than 11 million patients and generated +200 secondary data marts from IRB authorized research projects. During the Covid-19 pandemic, AHDS has had to evolve quickly to support administrative professionals and caregivers heavily involved in the reorganization of both patient care and biomedical research. Conclusion: The AP-HP Data Space is a key facilitator for data-driven evidence generation and making the health system more efficient and personalized

Computed Tomography-Aortography Versus Color-Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

International audienceBackground Color-duplex ultrasonography (DUS) could be an alternative to computed tomography-aortography (CTA) in the lifelong surveillance of patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but there is currently no level 1 evidence. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DUS as an alternative to CTA for the follow-up of post-EVAR patients. Methods Between December 16, 2010, and June 12, 2015, we conducted a prospective, blinded, diagnostic-accuracy study, in 15 French university hospitals where EVAR was commonly performed. Participants were followed up using both DUS and CTA in a mutually blinded setup until the end of the study or until any major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality requiring reintervention or an amendment to the follow-up policy was revealed by CTA. Database was locked on October 2, 2017. Our main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of DUS against reference standard CTA. CIs are binomial 95% CI. Results This study recruited prospectively 659 post-EVAR patients of whom 539 (82%) were eligible for further analysis. Following the baseline inclusion visit, 940 additional follow-up visits were performed in the 539 patients. Major aneurysm-related morphological abnormalities were revealed by CTA in 103 patients (17.2/100 person-years [95% CI, 13.9–20.5]). DUS accurately identified 40 patients where a major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality was present (sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29–48]) and 403 of 436 patients with negative CTA (specificity, 92% [95% CI, 90–95]). The negative predictive value and positive predictive value of DUS were 92% (95% CI, 90–95) and 39% (95% CI, 27–50), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.87 (95% CI, 2.9–9.6). DUS sensitivity reached 73% (95% CI, 51–96) in patients requiring an effective reintervention. Conclusions DUS had an overall low sensitivity in the follow-up of patients after EVAR, but its performance improved meaningfully when the subset of patients requiring effective reinterventions was considered. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01230203

Obesity Doubles Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Paris Hospitals, France: A Cohort Study on 5,795 Patients

International audienc

External validation of prognostic scores for COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized in Greater Paris University Hospitals

International audiencePurposeThe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an unparalleled influx of patients. Prognostic scores could help optimizing healthcare delivery, but most of them have not been comprehensively validated. We aim to externally validate existing prognostic scores for COVID-19.MethodsWe used “COVID-19 Evidence Alerts” (McMaster University) to retrieve high-quality prognostic scores predicting death or intensive care unit (ICU) transfer from routinely collected data. We studied their accuracy in a retrospective multicenter cohort of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January 2020 to April 2021 in the Greater Paris University Hospitals. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were computed for the prediction of the original outcome, 30-day in-hospital mortality and the composite of 30-day in-hospital mortality or ICU transfer.ResultsWe included 14,343 consecutive patients, 2583 (18%) died and 5067 (35%) died or were transferred to the ICU. We examined 274 studies and found 32 scores meeting the inclusion criteria: 19 had a significantly lower AUC in our cohort than in previously published validation studies for the original outcome; 25 performed better to predict in-hospital mortality than the composite of in-hospital mortality or ICU transfer; 7 had an AUC > 0.75 to predict in-hospital mortality; 2 had an AUC > 0.70 to predict the composite outcome.ConclusionSeven prognostic scores were fairly accurate to predict death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The 4C Mortality Score and the ABCS stand out because they performed as well in our cohort and their initial validation cohort, during the first epidemic wave and subsequent waves, and in younger and older patients