18 research outputs found

    Phosphopeptide interactions with BRCA1 BRCT domains: More than just a motif.

    Get PDF
    BRCA1 BRCT domains function as phosphoprotein-binding modules for recognition of the phosphorylated protein-sequence motif pSXXF. While the motif interaction interface provides strong anchor points for binding, protein regions outside the motif have recently been found to be important for binding affinity. In this review, we compare the available structural data for BRCA1 BRCT domains in complex with phosphopeptides in order to gain a more complete understanding of the interaction between phosphopeptides and BRCA1-BRCT domains.We thank Dr Takashi Ochi for helpful discussion and comments on the manuscript. QW and TLB are funded by the Wellcome Trust (Grant: 093167/Z/10/Z). HJ thanks UCB and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) for a CASE Studentship.This is the final published version. It first appeared at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.02.00

    Flexibility and small pockets at protein-protein interfaces: New insights into druggability.

    Get PDF
    The transient assembly of multiprotein complexes mediates many aspects of cell regulation and signalling in living organisms. Modulation of the formation of these complexes through targeting protein-protein interfaces can offer greater selectivity than the inhibition of protein kinases, proteases or other post-translational regulatory enzymes using substrate, co-factor or transition state mimetics. However, capitalising on protein-protein interaction interfaces as drug targets has been hindered by the nature of interfaces that tend to offer binding sites lacking the well-defined large cavities of classical drug targets. In this review we posit that interfaces formed by concerted folding and binding (disorder-to-order transitions on binding) of one partner and other examples of interfaces where a protein partner is bound through a continuous epitope from a surface-exposed helix, flexible loop or chain extension may be more tractable for the development of "orthosteric", competitive chemical modulators; these interfaces tend to offer small-volume but deep pockets and/or larger grooves that may be bound tightly by small chemical entities. We discuss examples of such protein-protein interaction interfaces for which successful chemical modulators are being developed.We thank our colleagues Alicia Higueruelo, Douglas Pires, Bernardo Ochoa and Chris Radoux for helpful comments and discussions. D.B.A is the recipient of a C. J. Martin Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1072476). H.J. is supported by a CASE Studentship from the UCB and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (Grant: BB/J500574/1). T.L.B. receives funding from University of Cambridge and The Wellcome Trust for facilities and support.This is the accepted manuscript of a paper published in Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (Jubb H, Blundell TL, Ascher DB, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 2015, doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.009). The final version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.009

    A study of minimum bar spacing for bond in thin-shell precast concrete

    Get PDF
    This thesis document was issued under the authority of another institution, not NPS. At the time it was written, a copy was added to the NPS Library collection for reasons not now known.  It has been included in the digital archive for its historical value to NPS.  Not believed to be a CIVINS (Civilian Institutions) title.The purpose of the tests was to determine the minimum bar spacing and clear cover required to develop bond in thin-shell, precast concrete. The tests were of the pull-out type in which round bars of two sizes were cast in a horizontal position; clear spacing and cover (always equal) and the length of embedment were varied. The slips of the bars were measured at the loaded and free ends.http://www.archive.org/details/studyofminimumba00col

    Mutations at protein-protein interfaces: Small changes over big surfaces have large impacts on human health.

    Get PDF
    Many essential biological processes including cell regulation and signalling are mediated through the assembly of protein complexes. Changes to protein-protein interaction (PPI) interfaces can affect the formation of multiprotein complexes, and consequently lead to disruptions in interconnected networks of PPIs within and between cells, further leading to phenotypic changes as functional interactions are created or disrupted. Mutations altering PPIs have been linked to the development of genetic diseases including cancer and rare Mendelian diseases, and to the development of drug resistance. The importance of these protein mutations has led to the development of many resources for understanding and predicting their effects. We propose that a better understanding of how these mutations affect the structure, function, and formation of multiprotein complexes provides novel opportunities for tackling them, including the development of small-molecule drugs targeted specifically to mutated PPIs.H.J. is currently funded by an Astex Pharmaceuticals Sustaining Innovation Postdoctoral Fellowship hosted at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. M.A.T was supported by scholarships from Promega Corporation, as well as the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA. B.O.M was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. D.B.A is the recipient of a C. J. Martin Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1072476) and is funded by the Wellcome Trust and Jack Brockhoff Foundation (JBF 4186, 2016). T.L.B. receives funding from the University of Cambridge and The Wellcome Trust for facilities and support

    PDBe-KB: a community-driven resource for structural and functional annotations.

    Get PDF
    The Protein Data Bank in Europe-Knowledge Base (PDBe-KB, https://pdbe-kb.org) is a community-driven, collaborative resource for literature-derived, manually curated and computationally predicted structural and functional annotations of macromolecular structure data, contained in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The goal of PDBe-KB is two-fold: (i) to increase the visibility and reduce the fragmentation of annotations contributed by specialist data resources, and to make these data more findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) and (ii) to place macromolecular structure data in their biological context, thus facilitating their use by the broader scientific community in fundamental and applied research. Here, we describe the guidelines of this collaborative effort, the current status of contributed data, and the PDBe-KB infrastructure, which includes the data exchange format, the deposition system for added value annotations, the distributable database containing the assembled data, and programmatic access endpoints. We also describe a series of novel web-pages-the PDBe-KB aggregated views of structure data-which combine information on macromolecular structures from many PDB entries. We have recently released the first set of pages in this series, which provide an overview of available structural and functional information for a protein of interest, referenced by a UniProtKB accession

    Understanding the impacts of missense mutations on structures and functions of human cancer-related genes: A preliminary computational analysis of the COSMIC Cancer Gene Census.

    Get PDF
    Genomics and genome screening are proving central to the study of cancer. However, a good appreciation of the protein structures coded by cancer genes is also invaluable, especially for the understanding of functions, for assessing ligandability of potential targets, and for designing new drugs. To complement the wealth of information on the genetics of cancer in COSMIC, the most comprehensive database for cancer somatic mutations available, structural information obtained experimentally has been brought together recently in COSMIC-3D. Even where structural information is available for a gene in the Cancer Gene Census, a list of genes in COSMIC with substantial evidence supporting their impacts in cancer, this information is quite often for a single domain in a larger protein or for a single protomer in a multiprotein assembly. Here, we show that over 60% of the genes included in the Cancer Gene Census are predicted to possess multiple domains. Many are also multicomponent and membrane-associated molecular assemblies, with mutations recorded in COSMIC affecting such assemblies. However, only 469 of the gene products have a structure represented in the PDB, and of these only 87 structures have 90-100% coverage over the sequence and 69 have less than 10% coverage. As a first step to bridging gaps in our knowledge in the many cases where individual protein structures and domains are lacking, we discuss our attempts of protein structure modelling using our pipeline and investigating the effects of mutations using two of our in-house methods (SDM2 and mCSM) and identifying potential driver mutations. This allows us to begin to understand the effects of mutations not only on protein stability but also on protein-protein, protein-ligand and protein-nucleic acid interactions. In addition, we consider ways to combine the structural information with the wealth of mutation data available in COSMIC. We discuss the impacts of COSMIC missense mutations on protein structure in order to identify and assess the molecular consequences of cancer-driving mutations.TLB acknowledges support through his Wellcome Trust Investigator Award 200814/Z/16/
    corecore