Association of Genetic Variants in NUDT15 with Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Funding Information: reported serving as a consultant for AbbVie UK; receiving honoraria from Falk and AbbVie UK; receiving grants from Crohn’s & Colitis UK and Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals; having a fellowship from the UK National Institute for Health Research; and receiving travel reimbursement from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Norgine. Dr Heap reported receiving travel reimbursement from AbbVie; and being a current employee of AbbVie and owning stock in the company. Dr Andersen reported receiving personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Janssen. Dr Ananthakrishnan reported receiving a grant from Pfizer; and receiving personal fees from Takeda. Dr Beaugerie reported receiving advisory board fees from Allergan, Janssen, and Pfizer; receiving a grant from Hospira; and receiving grants and honoraria from AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ferring, Takeda, and Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals. Dr Cummings reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Takeda, Biogen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Hakim Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer/Hospira; and receiving grants from Takeda, Biogen, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer/Hospira. Dr Halfvarson reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Hospira, Janssen, Medivir, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, RenapharmaVifor, Takeda, Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Sandoz, and Shire; and receiving grants from Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Takeda. Dr Hart reported receiving advisory board fees from AbbVie, Atlantic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda; receiving honoraria from Falk and Ferring; and receiving a grant from Takeda. Dr Irving reported receiving personal fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Samsung, and Sandoz; and receiving grants from Takeda and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Dr Lindsay reported receiving advisory board fees from Atlantic Health, AbbVie UK/global, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Shire UK, Vifor Pharma, Ferring International, Celltrion, Takeda, Napp, Pfizer, and Janssen; serving as a consultant for AbbVie UK/global, Takeda, and Pfizer; receiving grants from Shire UK, AbbVie UK/global, Warner Chilcott, Funding Information: Takeda, Hospira, Ferring International, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; receiving honoraria from Takeda, Cornerstones US, Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals, Napp, Shire International, Janssen, AbbVie, and Pfizer; and receiving travel reimbursement from AbbVie UK, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Warner Chilcott, Takeda, and Shire International. Dr McGovern reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, and Janssen; and serving as a consultant for Pfizer, Q Biologics, Cidara, Gilead, and Janssen. Dr Seksik reported receiving advisory board fees from Astellas; receiving honoraria from Takeda, AbbVie, and Ferring; and receiving grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Biocodex. Dr Sokol reported receiving grants from Biocodex, Danone, and BiomX; serving as a consultant for Enterome, Takeda, AbbVie, Roche, Amgen, Danone, BiomX, Ferring, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals, and Biose; and being the co-founder of Nextbiotix. Dr Annese reported receiving advisory board fees from Takeda, AbbVie, and Medtronic; and receiving honoraria from Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie, and Medtronic. Dr Weersma reported receiving grants from Takeda, Ferring, and Tramedico; and receiving personal fees from AbbVie. Dr Goodhand reported receiving honoraria from Falk, AbbVie, and Shield Therapeutics. Dr Kennedy reported serving as a consultant for Falk; receiving honoraria from Falk, Allergan, Pharmacosmos, and Takeda; and being a deputy editor of Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Dr Ahmad reported receiving unrestricted grants, advisory board fees, speaker honoraria, and support to attend international meetings from AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Tillott’s Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Pfizer, Napp, Celltrion, and Hospira. No other disclosures were reported. Funding Information: Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California), Alistair McNair, PhD (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK), Anita Modi, MD (Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK), Kevin Monahan, PhD (West Middlesex University Hospital, Middlesex, UK), Alex Moran, MD (Northern Devon Healthcare Trust, Barnstaple, UK), Mary-Anne Morris, MD (Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK), Marianne Mortimore, MBBS (Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia), Craig Mowat, MD (Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK), Rafeeq Muhammed, MD (Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK), Charles D. R. Murray, PhD (Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), Hanlie Olivier (IBD Pharmacogenetics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK), Timothy R. Orchard, DM (Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK), Simon Panter, MD (South Tyneside District Hospital, South Tyneside, UK), Vinod Patel, MBBS (Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK), Rosemary Phillips, MD (Princess Alexandra Hospital, Essex, UK), Neeraj Prasad, MSc (Wrightington Hospital, Wrightington, UK), Cathryn Preston, MBChB (Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK), Graham Radford-Smith, PhD (Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia), Praveen Rajasekhar, MD (Northumbria NHS Trust, Tyne and Wear, UK), Dipak Roy, PhD (Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK), Rebecca Saich, PhD (Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK), Jack Satsangi, PhD (Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK), Stefan Schreiber, PhD (Kiel University, Kiel, Germany), Sandip Sen, MD (Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK), Neil Shah, MD (Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), Richard Shenderay, MBBS (Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Keighley, UK), Acuth Shenoy, MD (Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK), James Shutt, DM (Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK), Mark Silverberg, PhD (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Alison Simmons, PhD (Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK), Jonathan Simmons, DM (Royal Berkshire Hospital, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK), Salil Singh, PhD (Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK), Malcolm Smith, MBChB (Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK), Mark Smith, MD (Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK), Melissa Smith, MB (Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK), Jonathon A. Snook, DPhil (Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK), Sunil Sonwalker, MD (Calderdale Royal Hospital, Halifax, UK), Christine R. Stevens, PhD (Broad Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Giacomo Sturniolo, PhD (Univerita di Padova, Padova, Italy), Sreedhar Subramanian, MD (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK), Amanda Thomas, MBBS (Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK), Mark Tighe, BM (Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK), Franco Torrente, MD (Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK), Mark Tremelling, MD (Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK), Epameinondas Tsianos, PhD (University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece), Deven Vani, MD (Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK), Alissa Walsh, MBBS (St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia), Gillian Watermeyer, MBChB (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa), David Watts, MBChB (Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK), Gill Watts, MD (Wythenshawe Hospital, South Manchester, UK), Sean Weaver, PhD (Royal Bournemouth General Hospital, Bournemouth, UK), Emma Wesley, MBBS (Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Hospitals, Taunton, UK), Anne Willmott, MBChB (Leicester Royal Infirmary-Paediatric, Leicester, UK), Karen Yearsley, BM (Nevill Hall Hospital, Abergavenny, UK), Veena Zambar, MBBS (Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK), and Sebastian Zeissig, MD (University Medical Center Schleswig-Hostein, Kiel, Germany). These individuals identified and recruited patient s to the study and provided comments on a draft of the manuscript. Funding Information: Adverse Events Consortium funded the sample collection and genotyping at the Broad Institute. The UK National Institute for Health Research provided research nurse support to facilitate recruitment at all UK research sites. Crohn’s & Colitis UK and forCrohns provided funding support and publicized this study to their members. The Exeter National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Facility provided DNA storage and management. Institutional strategic support award WT097835MF from Wellcome Trust supported the management of the study. Samples from Cedars-Sinai were collected and processed through the MIRIAD biobank that was funded by grant P01DK046763 from the National Institutes of Health. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.IMPORTANCE Use of thiopurines may be limited by myelosuppression. TPMT pharmacogenetic testing identifies only 25% of at-risk patients of European ancestry. Among patients of East Asian ancestry, NUDT15 variants are associated with thiopurine-induced myelosuppression (TIM). OBJECTIVE To identify genetic variants associated with TIM among patients of European ancestry with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study of 491 patients affected by TIM and 679 thiopurine-tolerant unaffected patients who were recruited from 89 international sites between March 2012 and November 2015. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and exome-wide association studies (EWAS) were conducted in patients of European ancestry. The replication cohort comprised 73 patients affected by TIM and 840 thiopurine-tolerant unaffected patients. EXPOSURES Genetic variants associated with TIM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thiopurine-induced myelosuppression, defined as a decline in absolute white blood cell count to 2.5 x 10(9)/L or less or a decline in absolute neutrophil cell count to 1.0 x 10(9)/L or less leading to a dose reduction or drug withdrawal. RESULTS Among 1077 patients (398 affected and 679 unaffected; median age at IBD diagnosis, 31.0 years [interquartile range, 21.2 to 44.1 years]; 540 [50%] women; 602 [56%] diagnosed as having Crohn disease), 919 (311 affected and 608 unaffected) were included in the GWAS analysis and 961 (328 affected and 633 unaffected) in the EWAS analysis. The GWAS analysis confirmed association of TPMT (chromosome 6, rs11969064) with TIM (30.5% [95/311] affected vs 16.4% [100/608] unaffected patients; odds ratio [OR], 2.3 [95% CI, 1.7 to 3.1], P = 5.2 x 10(-9)). The EWAS analysis demonstrated an association with an in-frame deletion in NUDT15 (chromosome 13, rs746071566) and TIM (5.8% [19/328] affected vs 0.2% [1/633] unaffected patients; OR, 38.2 [95% CI, 5.1 to 286.1], P = 1.3 x 10(-8)), which was replicated in a different cohort (2.7% [2/73] affected vs 0.2% [2/840] unaffected patients; OR, 11.8 [95% CI, 1.6 to 85.0], P = .03). Carriage of any of 3 coding NUDT15 variants was associated with an increased risk (OR, 27.3 [95% CI, 9.3 to 116.7], P = 1.1 x 10(-7)) of TIM, independent of TPMT genotype and thiopurine dose. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients of European ancestry with IBD, variants in NUDT15 were associated with increased risk of TIM. These findings suggest that NUDT15 genotyping may be considered prior to initiation of thiopurine therapy; however, further study including additional validation in independent cohorts is required.Peer reviewe

A candidate fusion engineering material, WC-FeCr

A new candidate fusion engineering material, WC-FeCr, has been irradiated with He ions at 25 and 500 °C. Ions were injected at 6 keV to a dose of ~15 dpa and 50 at. % He, simulating direct helium injection from the plasma. The microstructural evolution was continuously characterised in situ using transmission electron microscopy. In the FeCr phase, a coarse array of 3–6 nm bubbles formed. In the WC, bubbles were less prominent and smaller (~2 nm). Spherical-cap bubbles formed at hetero-phase interfaces of tertiary precipitates, indicating that enhanced processing routes to minimise precipitation could further improve irradiation tolerance

Collaborative development of remote electronics laboratories in the ELVIS ilab

Remote laboratories represent a significant value to engineering curricula in a variety of cases. Whether it is a complement to a hands-on experience or a substitute when a traditional lab is not feasible, remote laboratories can be a valuable educational resource. Since 1998, the MIT iLab Project has worked to increase the quality and availability of remote laboratories. Using the iLab Shared Architecture, developers of new labs can leverage a set of generic support functions and then share those labs easily and with minimal administrative cost. More recently, the iLab Project, in partnership with Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria, Makerere University in Uganda and the University of Dar-es-Salaam in Tanzania and in coordination with the Maricopa Advanced Technology Education Center (MATEC), has focused on building iLabs around the National Instruments Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS) platform. The ELVIS is a low-cost, small-footprint unit that contains most of the common test instruments found in a typical electrical engineering lab. By coupling the ELVIS with iLabs, a variety of remote electronics laboratories can be built and shared around the world. Using this common hardware/software platform, participants in the iLab Project at different levels of the educational spectrum have developed experiments that meet their individual curricular needs and are able to host them for use by other peer institutions. Not only does this increase the variety of ELVISbased iLabs, but it also spurs the creation of teams that can then build other, more diverse iLabs and substantively participate in project-wide collaborative development efforts. Through such coordinated efforts, iLabs can provide rich practical experiences for studentsMaricopa County Community College District. Maricopa Advanced Technology Education CenterCarnegie Corporation of New YorkMicrosoft CorporationNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (award 0702735)Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Cente

Prognostic models for surgical-site infection in gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at high risk of surgical-site infection may allow clinicians to target interventions and monitoring to minimize associated morbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate prognostic tools for the prediction of surgical-site infection in gastrointestinal surgery.METHODS: This systematic review sought to identify original studies describing the development and validation of prognostic models for 30-day SSI after gastrointestinal surgery (PROSPERO: CRD42022311019). MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and IEEE Xplore were searched from 1 January 2000 to 24 February 2022. Studies were excluded if prognostic models included postoperative parameters or were procedure specific. A narrative synthesis was performed, with sample-size sufficiency, discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), and prognostic accuracy compared.RESULTS: Of 2249 records reviewed, 23 eligible prognostic models were identified. A total of 13 (57 per cent) reported no internal validation and only 4 (17 per cent) had undergone external validation. Most identified operative contamination (57 per cent, 13 of 23) and duration (52 per cent, 12 of 23) as important predictors; however, there remained substantial heterogeneity in other predictors identified (range 2-28). All models demonstrated a high risk of bias due to the analytic approach, with overall low applicability to an undifferentiated gastrointestinal surgical population. Model discrimination was reported in most studies (83 per cent, 19 of 23); however, calibration (22 per cent, 5 of 23) and prognostic accuracy (17 per cent, 4 of 23) were infrequently assessed. Of externally validated models (of which there were four), none displayed 'good' discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve greater than or equal to 0.7).CONCLUSION: The risk of surgical-site infection after gastrointestinal surgery is insufficiently described by existing risk-prediction tools, which are not suitable for routine use. Novel risk-stratification tools are required to target perioperative interventions and mitigate modifiable risk factors.</p

Heterodimensional charge-carrier confinement in stacked submonolayer InAs in GaAs

Charge-carrier confinement in nanoscale In-rich agglomerations within a lateral InGaAs quantum well (QW) formed from stacked submonolayers (SMLs) of InAs in GaAs is studied. Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) and magneto-PL clearly demonstrate strong vertical and weak lateral confinement, yielding two-dimensional (2D) excitons. In contrast, high-temperature (400 K) magneto-PL reveals excited states that fit a Fock-Darwin spectrum, characteristic of a zero-dimensional (0D) system in a magnetic field. This paradox is resolved by concluding that the system is heterodimensional: the light electrons extend over several In-rich agglomerations and see only the lateral InGaAs QW, i.e., are 2D, while the heavier holes are confined within the In-rich agglomerations, i.e., are 0D. This description is supported by single-particle effective-mass and eight-band k⋅p calculations. We suggest that the heterodimensional nature of nanoscale SML inclusions is fundamental to the ability of respective optoelectronic devices to operate efficiently and at high speed

When Loss is More: From Managed Decline to Adaptive Release

This is the final version. Available on open access from Routledge via the DOI in this recordWithin the heritage sector there is widespread recognition that the accelerating effects of climate and other changes will necessitate reconsideration of the care of at-risk places and properties. Heritage organisations and agencies are developing new ways to identify and measure future threats, and to prioritise resources accordingly. For some designated assets, it is becoming clear, it may be necessary to manage processes of decline and transformation. Drawing on insights gathered from conversations with natural and historic environment practitioners and regulators, this paper highlights current practice and policy around managed decline, with a focus on the English context. In seeking to address some of the limitations of current approaches, this paper introduces a new conceptual framework: adaptive release. Adaptive release, as presented here, reflects a decision to accommodate the dynamic transformation of a heritage asset and its associated values and significance, with reference to wider landscape settings. The focus is on iterative management over extended timeframes, involving some relinquishment of control and a commitment to ongoing monitoring and interpretation. The concept of adaptive release is presented provisionally, rather than prescriptively, to expand the range of options available to natural and historic environment professionals in responding to inevitable change.Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC

Treatment-resistant depression and peripheral C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a candidate biomarker for major depressive disorder (MDD), but it is unclear how peripheral CRP levels relate to the heterogeneous clinical phenotypes of the disorder.AimTo explore CRP in MDD and its phenotypic associations. METHOD: We recruited 102 treatment-resistant patients with MDD currently experiencing depression, 48 treatment-responsive patients with MDD not currently experiencing depression, 48 patients with depression who were not receiving medication and 54 healthy volunteers. High-sensitivity CRP in peripheral venous blood, body mass index (BMI) and questionnaire assessments of depression, anxiety and childhood trauma were measured. Group differences in CRP were estimated, and partial least squares (PLS) analysis explored the relationships between CRP and specific clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: Compared with healthy volunteers, BMI-corrected CRP was significantly elevated in the treatment-resistant group (P = 0.007; Cohen's d = 0.47); but not significantly so in the treatment-responsive (d = 0.29) and untreated (d = 0.18) groups. PLS yielded an optimal two-factor solution that accounted for 34.7% of variation in clinical measures and for 36.0% of variation in CRP. Clinical phenotypes most strongly associated with CRP and heavily weighted on the first PLS component were vegetative depressive symptoms, BMI, state anxiety and feeling unloved as a child or wishing for a different childhood. CONCLUSIONS: CRP was elevated in patients with MDD, and more so in treatment-resistant patients. Other phenotypes associated with elevated CRP included childhood adversity and specific depressive and anxious symptoms. We suggest that patients with MDD stratified for proinflammatory biomarkers, like CRP, have a distinctive clinical profile that might be responsive to second-line treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs.Declaration of interestS.R.C. consults for Cambridge Cognition and Shire; and his input in this project was funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Fellowship (110049/Z/15/Z). E.T.B. is employed half time by the University of Cambridge and half time by GlaxoSmithKline; he holds stock in GlaxoSmithKline. In the past 3 years, P.J.C. has served on an advisory board for Lundbeck. N.A.H. consults for GlaxoSmithKline. P.d.B., D.N.C.J. and W.C.D. are employees of Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC., of Johnson &amp; Johnson, and hold stock in Johnson &amp; Johnson. The other authors report no financial disclosures or potential conflicts of interest.This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust strategy award to the Neuroimmunology of Mood Disorders and Alzheimer’s Disease (NIMA) Consortium which is also funded by Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck and Pfizer. Recruitment of patients was supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network: Kent, Surrey and Sussex & Eastern. SRC consults for Cambridge Cognition and Shire; and his input in this project was funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Fellowship (110049/Z/15/Z). ETB is employed half-time by the University of Cambridge and half-time by GlaxoSmithKline; he holds stock in GSK. In the last three years PJC has served on an advisory board for Lundbeck. NAH consults for GSK. PdB, DJ and WCD are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC., of Johnson & Johnson, and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson

The benefits of being a near-peer teacher

Background: Near-peer teaching is used in anatomy education because of its benefits to the learner, teacher and faculty. Despite the range of reports focusing on the learner, the advantages for the teacher, which are thought to include communication skills, subject knowledge and employability, are only beginning to be explored. Method: A questionnaire was distributed to the teachers involved in anatomy near-peer teaching at the University of Southampton and Brighton and Sussex Medical School. This questionnaire was designed using 0-10 rating scales to assess teacher perspectives on their level of knowledge, teaching skills and enjoyment of teaching. Free text responses determined the teachers’ motivation and perceived benefits from the teaching. Results: Twenty-eight questionnaires were gathered (54.9% response rate) including 20 from Southampton and 8 from BSMS. Long term knowledge retention and better understanding of the material were rated 8.1 and 7.9 out of 10 respectively. Eight responses were from currently practising doctors, who rated how much they now use their teaching skills as doctors as 8.9 out of 10. Of the 8 doctors, 7 gained points for their foundation programme applications as a direct result of near-peer teaching. The most common motivator for engaging in teaching was to improve subject matter knowledge and the most common benefit was improved communication skills. Discussion: There are numerous advantages to being a near-peer teacher in medical school, which include knowledge improvement, transferrable professional skills and employability. These initial results support the hypothesised benefits to the teachers and provide a foundation for further longitudinal studies