Mutations in DCHS1 Cause Mitral Valve Prolapse

SUMMARY Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common cardiac valve disease that affects nearly 1 in 40 individuals1–3. It can manifest as mitral regurgitation and is the leading indication for mitral valve surgery4,5. Despite a clear heritable component, the genetic etiology leading to non-syndromic MVP has remained elusive. Four affected individuals from a large multigenerational family segregating non-syndromic MVP underwent capture sequencing of the linked interval on chromosome 11. We report a missense mutation in the DCHS1 gene, the human homologue of the Drosophila cell polarity gene dachsous (ds) that segregates with MVP in the family. Morpholino knockdown of the zebrafish homolog dachsous1b resulted in a cardiac atrioventricular canal defect that could be rescued by wild-type human DCHS1, but not by DCHS1 mRNA with the familial mutation. Further genetic studies identified two additional families in which a second deleterious DCHS1 mutation segregates with MVP. Both DCHS1 mutations reduce protein stability as demonstrated in zebrafish, cultured cells, and, notably, in mitral valve interstitial cells (MVICs) obtained during mitral valve repair surgery of a proband. Dchs1+/− mice had prolapse of thickened mitral leaflets, which could be traced back to developmental errors in valve morphogenesis. DCHS1 deficiency in MVP patient MVICs as well as in Dchs1+/− mouse MVICs result in altered migration and cellular patterning, supporting these processes as etiological underpinnings for the disease. Understanding the role of DCHS1 in mitral valve development and MVP pathogenesis holds potential for therapeutic insights for this very common disease

Adenoma Detection by Endocuff-Assisted versus Standard Colonoscopy in Routine Practice: A Cluster-Randomised Crossover Trial

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Endocuff Vision (ECV) is the second generation of a device designed to improve polyp detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate its impact on adenoma detection rate (ADR) in routine colonoscopy. DESIGN: This cluster-randomised crossover trial compared Endocuff-assisted (ECV+) with standard (ECV-) colonoscopy. Two teams of 11 endoscopists each with prior ECV experience, balanced in terms of basal ADR, gender and case volume were compared. In randomised fashion, the teams started with ECV+ or ECV- and switched group after inclusion of half of the cases. The main outcome criterion was ADR difference between ECV+ and ECV-. Subgroup analysis was done for physicians with low and high ADR (< or ≥q 25%). RESULTS: During two periods of 20 and 21 weeks, respectively, the 22 endoscopists included 2058 patients (1032 ECV- vs 1026 ECV+, both groups being comparable). Overall ADR for both groups taken together was higher with ECV (39.2%) than without (29.4%; p<0.001) irrespective of the sequence of use (ECV+ or ECV- first), but mostly in adenomas <1\,cm. In the physician subgroup analysis, only high detectors showed a significant ADR increase (from 31% to 41%, p<0.001), while the increase in the low detectors was not significant (from 24% to 30%, p=0.11). ECV had a positive impact in all colonic locations, except for the rectum. No ECV- related complication was reported. CONCLUSION: We observed a significant ADR difference of approximately 10% by the use of ECV. By subgroup analysis, this increase was significant only in physicians classified as high detectors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03344055)

Quelle éducation avec la Covid-19

APPEL A CONTRIBUTION : QUE NOUS APPREND LA PANDEMIE? Numéro HS Recherches et Educations (Juillet 2020) (HCERES 70ème section) Qu'est ce que la pandémie nous apprend de nos sociétés, de nos politiques de santé publique, des souverainetés épistémologiques de la recherche et des praxis individuelles et collectives? Solidarités ou/ et d'exclusions? Stratégies d'adaptation au confinement ou de rejet? Comment agit-on dans ce monde incertain, soumis à l'autorité des politiques de gestion d'un virus? Soumission volontaire à l'autorité ou organisation des résistances? Quels sont les savoirs exercés sur quels pouvoirs ? Quelles sont les légitimités et les responsabilités plurielles : individuelles, collectives, politiques et sociales ? Quels sont les usages sociaux et politiques des résultats de la recherche des experts ? Qu’apprenons nous des expériences de prévention individuelles, européennes et internationales ? Comment s’exercent les pouvoirs à partir des savoirs des épistémologies et des évidence-base medecine ? Comment l’histoire des épidémies pourrait répondre à notre présent ? Quel futur pour notre société après la pandémie ? Quelles seront nos inégalités sociales ? Vers quelles écologies ? Quelles résistances ? Quel mode de vie ? Quelles expériences corporelles de l’absence de toucher et de la distanciation ? Quelle croissance ? Quelle décroissance ? Quelles solidarités face à la techno-économique ? La revue Recherches & Educations lance un appel à contribution, multi disciplinaire, sur le « dispositif covid 19 » pendant le confinement imposé aux populations. Elle propose de réunir les textes critiques et réflexifs sur ce que nous apprend l’épidémie et la pandémie de nous même, de notre relation au vivant, à la mondialisation néolibérale, aux souverainetés de santé, au gouvernement des corps, de la psyché et de la vie, aux politiques de prévention, aux représentations de l’épidémie, aux pratiques corporelles visuelles et tactiles, aux modes de résistances et aux praxis du quotidien du présent et de demain. Texte à adresser (avant le 30 mai 2020) en 30.000 signes à [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Pancreatology

BACKGROUND: PRSS1 and PRSS2 constitute the only functional copies of a tandemly-arranged five-trypsinogen-gene cluster (i.e., PRSS1, PRSS3P1, PRSS3P2, TRY7 and PRSS2) on chromosome 7q35. Variants in PRSS1 and PRSS2, including missense and copy number variants (CNVs), have been reported to predispose to or protect against chronic pancreatitis (CP). We wondered whether a common trypsinogen pseudogene deletion CNV (that removes two of the three trypsinogen pseudogenes, PRSS3P2 and TRY7) might be associated with CP causation/predisposition. METHODS: We analyzed the common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV in a total of 1536 CP patients and 3506 controls from France, Germany, India and Japan by means of quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the deletion CNV variant was associated with a protective effect against CP in the French, German and Japanese cohorts whilst a trend toward the same association was noted in the Indian cohort. Meta-analysis under a dominant model yielded a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005) whereas an allele-based meta-analysis yielded a pooled OR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.92; p = 0.0001). This protective effect is explicable by reference to the recent finding that the still functional PRSS3P2/TRY7 pseudogene enhancers upregulate pancreatic PRSS2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: The common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV was associated with a reduced risk for CP. This finding provides additional support for the emerging view that dysregulated PRSS2 expression represents a discrete mechanism underlying CP predisposition or protection

The PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion copy number variant modifies risk for chronic pancreatitis

Background PRSS1 and PRSS2 constitute the only functional copies of a tandemly-arranged five-trypsinogen-gene cluster (i.e., PRSS1, PRSS3P1, PRSS3P2, TRY7 and PRSS2) on chromosome 7q35. Variants in PRSS1 and PRSS2, including missense and copy number variants (CNVs), have been reported to predispose to or protect against chronic pancreatitis (CP). We wondered whether a common trypsinogen pseudogene deletion CNV (that removes two of the three trypsinogen pseudogenes, PRSS3P2 and TRY7) might be associated with CP causation/predisposition. Methods We analyzed the common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV in a total of 1536 CP patients and 3506 controls from France, Germany, India and Japan by means of quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Results We demonstrated that the deletion CNV variant was associated with a protective effect against CP in the French, German and Japanese cohorts whilst a trend toward the same association was noted in the Indian cohort. Meta-analysis under a dominant model yielded a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.89; p = 0.005) whereas an allele-based meta-analysis yielded a pooled OR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.92; p = 0.0001). This protective effect is explicable by reference to the recent finding that the still functional PRSS3P2/TRY7 pseudogene enhancers upregulate pancreatic PRSS2 expression. Conclusions The common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV was associated with a reduced risk for CP. This finding provides additional support for the emerging view that dysregulated PRSS2 expression represents a discrete mechanism underlying CP predisposition or protection

The PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion copy number variant modifies risk for chronic pancreatitis

International audienc

Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Cost-Effective in High-Risk Patients with Cirrhosis

International audienc