Using a patient prompt list to raise concerns in oncology clinics does not necessarily lead to longer consultations

Head and neck oncology post-treatment consultations form a critical component of care in terms of support and surveillance. They occur frequently in the first few years and can place substantial demands on healthcare resources. However, they provide useful opportunities for patients to raise issues and receive tailored information and support. The aim of this paper was to assess whether completion of a 56-item patient prompt list (PCI - the Patient Concerns Inventory) immediately prior to the consultation significantly increased its duration. This was a pragmatic cluster preference randomised controlled trial of 288 patients with 15 consultant clusters from two sites “using” (n = 8) or “not using” (n = 7) the PCI. Consultation times were known for 283 patients (136 PCI, 147 non-PCI) who attended their first post-treatment trial consultation a median (IQR) of 103 (70-160) days after the end of treatment. Consultations lasted a median (IQR) of 10 (7-13) minutes (mean 11) in non-PCI patients and a median (IQR) of 11 (8-15) minutes (mean 12) in PCI patients (p = 0.07). After adjustment for patient clustering and significant case mix, the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference was between 1.45 minutes shorter with the PCI and 2.98 minutes longer (p = 0.50). There was significant variation in duration by consultant, tumour stage, treatment mode, overall quality of life (QoL), and distress (all p < 0.001). In those who completed the PCI, duration increased with the total number of items selected (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the inclusion of a prompt list to help facilitate conversation with patients did not make a substantial difference to consultation times

Dental attitudes and behaviour in children A psychological investigation into the dental health behaviour of 6-16 year old schoolchildren from 2 communities with different systems of dental care

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DX203574 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

Loneliness and quality of life after head and neck cancer

Loneliness is associated with a poor quality of life, mental illness, poor physical health, and premature mortality. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are at risk of loneliness because of the effects of the disease and its treatment on important social interactive functions such as appearance, speech, facial expression, and eating. Patients treated for primary squamous cell HNC between January 2015 and December 2016 were surveyed in early 2019 using the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire version 4, the Cancer-related Loneliness Assessment Tool (C-LAT), and four nationally recommended indicator questions. The survey comprised 140 patients, with a mean (standard deviation) age at diagnosis of 63 (11) years. Tumour sites were oropharyngeal (42%), oral (35%), laryngeal (14%), and elsewhere (9%). In response to the question “How often do you feel lonely?” three-quarters said “hardly ever” and only 6% “often”. Similar responses were obtained for the other three indicator questions. It is encouraging that a relatively small proportion had serious issues with loneliness. Similarly, responses to the C-LAT suggested that one-quarter had feelings of loneliness and a minority had serious problems. Patients who were younger, who lived in more deprived circumstances, who had advanced disease and had been treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy reported greater levels of loneliness. Loneliness was associated with a worse overall quality of life, and worse physical and social-emotional function. Lonely patients need to be identified as early as possible so that support and interventions can be implemented and outcomes improved.PostprintPeer reviewe