130 research outputs found
A hexamer origin of the echinoderms' five rays
Of the major deuterostome groups, the echinoderms with their multiple forms
and complex development are arguably the most mysterious. Although larval
echinoderms are bilaterally symmetric, the adult body seems to abandon the
larval body plan and to develop independently a new structure with different
symmetries. The prevalent pentamer structure, the asymmetry of Loven's rule and
the variable location of the periproct and madrepore present enormous
difficulties in homologizing structures across the major clades, despite the
excellent fossil record. This irregularity in body forms seems to place
echinoderms outside the other deuterostomes. Here I propose that the
predominant five-ray structure is derived from a hexamer structure that is
grounded directly in the structure of the bilaterally symmetric larva. This
hypothesis implies that the adult echinoderm body can be derived directly from
the larval bilateral symmetry and thus firmly ranks even the adult echinoderms
among the bilaterians. In order to test the hypothesis rigorously, a model is
developed in which one ray is missing between rays IV-V (Loven's schema) or
rays C-D (Carpenter's schema). The model is used to make predictions, which are
tested and verified for the process of metamorphosis and for the morphology of
recent and fossil forms. The theory provides fundamental insight into the
M-plane and the Ubisch', Loven's and Carpenter's planes and generalizes them
for all echinoderms. The theory also makes robust predictions about the
evolution of the pentamer structure and its developmental basis. *** including
corrections (see footnotes) ***Comment: 10 pages, 6 figure
Assessing canalisation of intraspecific variation on a macroevolutionary scale: the case of crinoid arms through the Phanerozoic
Clades that represent a new ‘Bauplan’ have been hypothesised to exhibit more variability than more derived clades. Accordingly, there is an expectation of greater variation around the time of the origin of a clade than later in its evolutionary history. This ‘canalisation’ has been tested in terms of morphological disparity (interspecific variation), whereas intraspecific variation in macroevolution is rarely studied. We analysed extensive data of brachial counts in crinoid populations from the Ordovician to the Recent to test for canalisation in morphological intraspecific variation. Our results show no support for the canalisation hypothesis through the Phanerozoic. This lack of pattern is maintained even when considering crinoid subclades separately. Our study is an example of the lack of universality in such macroevolutionary patterns both in terms of organisms and in terms of modules within them. It is also an example on the challenges and limitations of palaeontological studies of macroevolutionary processes
Fullerene‐like structures of Cretaceous crinoids reveal topologically limited skeletal possibilities
There are few cases where numbers or types of possible phenotypes are known, although vast state spaces have been postulated. Rarely applied in this context, graph theory and topology enable enumeration of possible phenotypes and evolutionary transitions. Here, we generate polyhedral calyx graphs for the Late Cretaceous, stemless crinoids Marsupites testudinarius and Uintacrinus socialis (Uintacrinoidea Zittel) revealing structural similarities to carbon fullerene and fulleroid molecules (respectively). The U. socialis calyx incorporates numerous plates (e.g. graph vertices |V| ≥ 197), which are small, light, low‐density and have four to eight sides. Therefore, the corresponding number of possible plate arrangements (number of polyhedral graphs) is large (≫1 × 1014). Graph vertices representing plates with sides >6 introduce negative Gaussian curvature (surface saddle points) and topological instability, increasing buckling risk. However, observed numbers of vertices for Uintacrinus do not allow more stable pentaradial configurations. In contrast, the Marsupites calyx dual graph has 17 faces that are pentagonal or hexagonal. Therefore, it is structurally identical to a carbon fullerene, specifically C30‐D5h. Corresponding graph restrictions result in constraint to only three structural options (fullerene structures C30‐C2v 1, C30‐C2v 2 and C30‐D5h). Further restriction to pentaradial symmetry allows only one possibility: the Marsupites phenotype. This robust, stable topology is consistent with adaptation to predation pressures of the Mesozoic marine revolution. Consequently, the most plausible evolutionary pathway between unitacrinoid phenotypes was a mixed heterochronic trade‐off to fewer, larger calyx plates. Therefore, topological limitations radically constrained uintacrinoid skeletal possibilities but thereby aided evolution of a novel adaptive phenotype
Morphologic Expressions and Paleogeographic Implications of Earliest Known (Floian, Early Ordovician) Hybocrinids
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171301/1/Contributions Vol 34 No 3.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171301/2/Contributions Vol 34 No 3 LoRes.pdfDescription of Contributions Vol 34 No 3.pdf : Main ArticleDescription of Contributions Vol 34 No 3 LoRes.pdf : Reduced Size PD
Pelmatozoan arms from the mid-Cambrian of Australia: bridging the gap between brachioles and brachials? Comment: there is no bridge.
9 pagesInternational audienc
- …