16 research outputs found
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for The Evaluation and Treatment of Male Sexual Dysfunction: a Couple’s Problem–2003 Update
The Princeton III Consensus recommendations for the management of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease
The Princeton Consensus (Expert Panel) Conference is a multispecialty collaborative tradition dedicated to optimizing sexual function and preserving cardiovascular health. The third Princeton Consensus met November 8 to 10, 2010, and had 2 primary objectives. The first objective focused on the evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and no known cardiovascular disease (CVD), with particular emphasis on identification of men with ED who may require additional cardiologic work-up. The second objective focused on reevaluation and modification of previous recommendations for evaluation of cardiac risk associated with sexual activity in men with known CVD. The Panel's recommendations build on those developed during the first and second Princeton Consensus Conferences, first emphasizing the use of exercise ability and stress testing to ensure that each man's cardiovascular health is consistent with the physical demands of sexual activity before prescribing treatment for ED, and second highlighting the link between ED and CVD, which may be asymptomatic and may benefit from cardiovascular risk reductio
Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction for Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk
Purpose: We established erectile dysfunction as an often neglected but
valuable marker of cardiovascular risk, particularly in younger men and
men with diabetes. We also reviewed evidence that lifestyle change,
combined with informed prescribing of pharmacotherapies used to mitigate
cardiovascular risk, can improve overall vascular health and sexual
functioning in men with erectile dysfunction.
Materials and Methods: We performed a PubMed (R) search for articles and
guidelines pertinent to relationships between erectile dysfunction and
cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular and all cause mortality, and
pharmacotherapies for dyslipidemia and hypertension. The clinical
guidance presented incorporates the current literature and the expertise
of the multispecialty investigator group.
Results: Numerous cardiovascular risk assessment tools exist but risk
stratification remains challenging, particularly in patients at low or
intermediate short-term risk. Erectile dysfunction has a predictive
value for cardiovascular events that is comparable to or better than
that of traditional risk factors. Interventional studies support
lifestyle changes as a means of improving overall vascular health as
well as sexual functioning. Statins, diuretics, beta-blockers and
renin-angiotensin system modifiers may positively or negatively affect
erectile function. Furthermore, the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors
used to treat erectile dysfunction may have systemic vascular benefits.
Conclusions: Erectile dysfunction treatment should be considered
secondary to decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, informed
prescribing may prevent worsening sexual function in men receiving
pharmacotherapy for dyslipidemia and hypertension. As the first point of
medical contact for men with erectile dysfunction symptoms, the primary
care physician or urologist has a unique opportunity to identify those
who require early intervention to prevent cardiovascular disease
The Princeton III Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease
The Princeton Consensus (Expert Panel) Conference is a multispecialty
collaborative tradition dedicated to optimizing sexual function and
preserving cardiovascular health. The third Princeton Consensus met
November 8 to 10, 2010, and had 2 primary objectives. The first
objective focused on the evaluation and management of cardiovascular
risk in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and no known cardiovascular
disease (CVD), with particular emphasis on identification of men with ED
who may require additional cardiologic work-up. The second objective
focused on reevaluation and modification of previous recommendations for
evaluation of cardiac risk associated with sexual activity in men with
known CVD. The Panel’s recommendations build on those developed during
the first and second Princeton Consensus Conferences, first emphasizing
the use of exercise ability and stress testing to ensure that each man’s
cardiovascular health is consistent with the physical demands of sexual
activity before prescribing treatment for ED, and second highlighting
the link between ED and CVD, which may be asymptomatic and may benefit
from cardiovascular risk reduction. (C) 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical
Education and Research Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(8):766-77