Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget

Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994–2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm−2) relative to snow-free and -onset dates varies substantially depending on vegetation type, implying vegetation controls on snow-cover and SEB-flux seasonality. Our results indicate complex shifts in surface energy fluxes with land-cover transitions and a lengthening summer season, and highlight the potential for improving future Earth system models via a refined representation of Arctic vegetation types

Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget

Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994-2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm(-2)) relative to snow-free and -onset dates varies substantially depending on vegetation type, implying vegetation controls on snow-cover and SEB-flux seasonality. Our results indicate complex shifts in surface energy fluxes with land-cover transitions and a lengthening summer season, and highlight the potential for improving future Earth system models via a refined representation of Arctic vegetation types.An international team of researchers finds high potential for improving climate projections by a more comprehensive treatment of largely ignored Arctic vegetation types, underscoring the importance of Arctic energy exchange measuring stations.Peer reviewe

Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget

Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994–2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm−2) relative to snow-free and -onset dates varies substantially depending on vegetation type, implying vegetation controls on snow-cover and SEB-flux seasonality. Our results indicate complex shifts in surface energy fluxes with land-cover transitions and a lengthening summer season, and highlight the potential for improving future Earth system models via a refined representation of Arctic vegetation types

Process-based methods to determine lake evaporation on different time scales

Process-based methods for estimating open-water evaporation are needed by many scientific communities because methods of direct evaporation measurement are generally not widely available. The performance of the Priestley-Taylor (PT), deBruin-Keijman (DBK), Bowen ratio energy budget (BREB), Penman (PM), Brutsaert-Stricker (BS), and deBruin (DB) evaporation models were evaluated using eddy covariance direct measurements of evaporation on monthly, daily, and 30-minute time scales. Eddy covariance and meteorological measurements used in this study were gathered from the Ross Barnett Reservoir in Mississippi, U.S.A., throughout the year of 2008. Performance of the evaporation models was determined using three metrics: ability for the evaporation models to explain variance in measured evaporation, magnitude of evaporation difference, and consistency in bias. It was concluded that the models fell into three performance tiers for the monthly (daily) time scale, with BREB, PT, and DBK (DBK, and PT) being in the top tier, PM and BS model falling in the middle performance tier, and the DB model being in the lowest performance tier; relative performance within each tier is indicated by the order in which the models are listed. The models did not naturally fall into three performance tiers for a 30-minute time scale, but were in the same order of performance as the monthly and daily time scales; PT and DBK performance were considered equal for this time scale. Performance of evaporation models were generally consistent throughout all time scales and could be ranked as follows: BREB, DBK/PT, PM, BS, and DB. 30-minute model performance was determined for both varying wind speed and stability conditions. As wind speed increased in magnitude, model performance decreased. It was also determined that when atmospheric stability was unstable, model performance was better relative to when the atmosphere was stable. All models performed poorest when atmospheric stability was near-neutral and wind speeds were high

Arctic springtime temperature and energy flux interannual variability is driven by 1- to 2-week frequency atmospheric events

The Arctic is experiencing amplified climate warming, decreasing sea ice extent, increasingly earlier springtime snowmelt, and a related increase in fire activity. The transition from cold to warm season in the Arctic strongly varies between years, but our understanding of temperature and surface energy budget changes over the springtime is limited. Here we investigate intraseasonal variability of Arctic springtime temperature and surface energy budget components and their interannual trends over 40 years (1981–2020) across the terrestrial Arctic (above 60° N) using ERA5-Land reanalysis data. We found the central and western Siberian regions to have the highest interannual variability in spring temperature anomaly among all Arctic regions during the 40-year period. Also in this region, we discovered the strength increased for heat extremes and decreased for cold extremes when comparing the first and the last 20 years of our study. Peaks in composited extreme temperature and surface energy budget anomalies were observed to occur concurrently, indicating temperature extremes are not driven by surface energy budget components. Lastly, by utilizing power spectrum analyses, we identified the primary driver of temperature anomaly interannual variability to be operating at a 1- to 2-week frequency. Based on our findings and observations in the recent literature, we hypothesize that the observed interannual variability in springtime temperature can be attributed to increased Arctic sea ice decline and an increase in the frequency and strength of associated atmospheric blocking events

Design of the tundra rainfall experiment (TRainEx) to simulate future summer precipitation scenarios

The majority of climate models predict severe increases in future temperature and precipitation in the Arctic. Increases in temperature and precipitation can lead to an intensification of the hydrologic cycle that strongly impacts Arctic environmental conditions. In order to investigate effects of future precipitation scenarios on ecosystems, precipitation manipulation experiments are being performed to simulate drought and extreme precipitation conditions. However, most of the existing research so far has been unevenly distributed, primarily focusing on temperate grasslands and woodlands. Despite large changes in the predicted precipitation and potentially high sensitivity of the Arctic tundra ecosystem to these changes, it is among the most understudied ecosystems for precipitation manipulation experiments

Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget

Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994–2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm−2) relative to snow-free and -onset dates varies substantially depending on vegetation type, implying vegetation controls on snow-cover and SEB-flux seasonality. Our results indicate complex shifts in surface energy fluxes with land-cover transitions and a lengthening summer season, and highlight the potential for improving future Earth system models via a refined representation of Arctic vegetation types.ISSN:2041-172

Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget

Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994–2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm−2) relative to snow-free and -onset dates varies substantially depending on vegetation type, implying vegetation controls on snow-cover and SEB-flux seasonality. Our results indicate complex shifts in surface energy fluxes with land-cover transitions and a lengthening summer season, and highlight the potential for improving future Earth system models via a refined representation of Arctic vegetation types. Supplemental files are attached below

Literature synthesis data of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers from Arctic vegetation and glacier sites

Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset describes the data generated in a literature synthesis, covering 358 study sites on vegetation or glacier (>=60°N latitude), which contained surface energy budget observations. The literature synthesis comprised 148 publications searched on the ISI Web of Science Core Collection