255 research outputs found

    Empirically Derived Sensitivity of Vegetation to Climate across Global Gradients of Temperature and Precipitation

    Get PDF
    The natural composition of terrestrial ecosystems can be shaped by climate to take advantage of local environmental conditions. Ecosystem functioning (e.g., interaction between photosynthesis and temperature) can also acclimate to different climatological states. The combination of these two factors thus determines ecological–climate interactions. A global empirical map of the sensitivity of vegetation to climate is derived using the response of satellite-observed greenness to interannual variations in temperature and precipitation. Mechanisms constraining ecosystem functioning are inferred by analyzing how the sensitivity of vegetation to climate varies across climate space. Analysis yields empirical evidence for multiple physical and biological mediators of the sensitivity of vegetation to climate at large spatial scales. In hot and wet locations, vegetation is greener in warmer years despite temperatures likely exceeding thermally optimum conditions. However, sunlight generally increases during warmer years, suggesting that the increased stress from higher atmospheric water demand is offset by higher rates of photosynthesis. The sensitivity of vegetation transitions in sign (greener when warmer or drier to greener when cooler or wetter) along an emergent line in climate space with a slope of about 59 mm yr^(−1) °C^(−1), twice as steep as contours of aridity. The mismatch between these slopes is evidence at a global scale of the limitation of both water supply due to inefficiencies in plant access to rainfall and plant physiological responses to atmospheric water demand. This empirical pattern can provide a functional constraint for process-based models, helping to improve predictions of the global-scale response of vegetation to a changing climate

    Primary care blood tests before cancer diagnosis: National Cancer Diagnosis Audit data

    Get PDF
    Background: Blood tests can support the diagnostic process but how often they are used in cancer patients is unclear. Aim: To explore use of common blood tests before cancer diagnosis in primary care. Design and setting: English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit data on 39,752 cancer patients diagnosed in 2018. Methods: We assessed common blood test use (full blood count (FBC), urea and electrolytes (U&Es), and liver function tests (LFTs)), related variation by patient and symptom group, and associations with the primary care and the diagnostic intervals (PCI, DI). Results: At least one common blood test was used in 41% of cancer patients. Among tested patients, FBC was used in 95%, U&Es in 88% and LFTs in 74%) Blood testing was less common in women (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) vs men: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87-0.98) and non-white patients (0.89, 0.82-0.97 vs white) and more common in older patients (1.12, 1.06-1.18 for 70+ vs 50-69 years). Test use varied greatly by cancer-site, (melanoma: 2%, leukaemia 84%). Fewer patients presenting with alarm symptoms alone were tested (24%) than those with non-alarm symptoms alone (50%). Median PCI and DI were longer in tested than non-tested patients (PCI: 10 vs 0; DI: 49 vs 32 days, respectively, p<0.001 for both), including among tested patients with alarm symptoms (PCI: 4 vs 0; DI: 41 vs 22). Conclusions: Two-fifths of patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer have primary care blood tests. Given variable test use, research is needed on the clinical context in which blood tests are ordered

    Airships: A New Horizon for Science

    Get PDF
    The "Airships: A New Horizon for Science" study at the Keck Institute for Space Studies investigated the potential of a variety of airships currently operable or under development to serve as observatories and science instrumentation platforms for a range of space, atmospheric, and Earth science. The participants represent a diverse cross-section of the aerospace sector, NASA, and academia. Over the last two decades, there has been wide interest in developing a high altitude, stratospheric lighter-than-air (LTA) airship that could maneuver and remain in a desired geographic position (i.e., "station-keeping") for weeks, months or even years. Our study found considerable scientific value in both low altitude (< 40 kft) and high altitude (> 60 kft) airships across a wide spectrum of space, atmospheric, and Earth science programs. Over the course of the study period, we identified stratospheric tethered aerostats as a viable alternative to airships where station-keeping was valued over maneuverability. By opening up the sky and Earth's stratospheric horizon in affordable ways with long-term flexibility, airships allow us to push technology and science forward in a project-rich environment that complements existing space observatories as well as aircraft and high-altitude balloon missions.Comment: This low resolution version of the report is 8.6 MB. For the high resolution version see: http://kiss.caltech.edu/study/airship
    corecore