1,096 research outputs found
Valproate induces the unfolded protein response by increasing ceramide levels
Bipolar disorder (BD), which is characterized by depression and mania, affects 1–2% of the world population. Current treatments are effective in only 40–60% of cases and cause severe side effects. Valproate (VPA) is one of the most widely used drugs for the treatment of BD, but the therapeutic mechanism of action of this drug is not understood. This knowledge gap has hampered the development of effective treatments. To identify candidate pathways affected by VPA, we performed a genome- wide expression analysis in yeast cells grown in the presence or absence of the drug. VPA caused up-regulation of FEN1 and SUR4, encoding fatty acid elongases that catalyze the synthesis of very long chain fatty acids (C24 to C26) required for ceramide synthesis. Interestingly, fen1Δ and sur4Δ mutants exhibited VPA sensitivity. In agreement with increased fatty acid elongase gene expression, VPA increased levels of phytoceramide, especially those containing C24–C26 fatty acids. Consistent with an increase in ceramide, VPA decreased the expression of amino acid transporters, increased the expression of ER chaperones, and activated the unfolded protein response element (UPRE), suggesting that VPA induces the UPR pathway. These effects were rescued by supplementation of inositol and similarly observed in inositol-starved ino1Δ cells. Starvation of ino1Δ cells increased expression of FEN1 and SUR4, increased ceramide levels, decreased expression of nutrient transporters, and induced the UPR. These findings suggest that VPA-mediated inositol depletion induces the UPR by increasing the de novo synthesis of ceramide
Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations
BACKGROUND: The provision of high-quality maternity services is a priority for reducing inequalities in health outcomes for mothers and infants. Best practice includes women having their initial antenatal appointment within the first trimester of pregnancy in order to provide screening and support for healthy lifestyles, well-being and self-care in pregnancy. Previous research has identified inequalities in access to antenatal care, yet there is little evidence on interventions to improve early initiation of antenatal care. The Community REACH trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of engaging communities in the co-production and delivery of an intervention that addresses this issue.
METHODS/DESIGN: The study design is a matched cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations. The unit of randomisation is electoral ward. The intervention will be delivered in 10 wards; 10 comparator wards will have normal practice. The primary outcome is the proportion of pregnant women attending their antenatal booking appointment by the 12th completed week of pregnancy. This and a number of secondary outcomes will be assessed for cohorts of women (n = approximately 1450 per arm) who give birth 2-7 and 8-13 months after intervention delivery completion in the included wards, using routinely collected maternity data. Eight hospitals commissioned to provide maternity services in six NHS trusts in north and east London and Essex have been recruited to the study. These trusts will provide anonymised routine data for randomisation and outcomes analysis. The process evaluation will examine intervention implementation, acceptability, reach and possible causal pathways. The economic evaluation will use a cost-consequences analysis and decision model to evaluate the intervention. Targeted community engagement in the research process was a priority.
DISCUSSION: Community REACH aims to increase early initiation of antenatal care using an intervention that is co-produced and delivered by local communities. This pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, with integrated process and economic evaluation, aims to rigorously assess the effectiveness of this public health intervention, which is particularly complex due to the required combination of standardisation with local flexibility. It will also answer questions about scalability and generalisability.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: registration number 63066975 . Registered on 18 August 2015
Global access to surgical care: a modelling study
Background More than 2 billion people are unable to receive surgical care based on operating theatre density alone.
The vision of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery is universal access to safe, aff ordable surgical and anaesthesia
care when needed. We aimed to estimate the number of individuals worldwide without access to surgical services as
defi ned by the Commission’s vision.
Methods We modelled access to surgical services in 196 countries with respect to four dimensions: timeliness,
surgical capacity, safety, and aff ordability. We built a chance tree for each country to model the probability of surgical
access with respect to each dimension, and from this we constructed a statistical model to estimate the proportion of
the population in each country that does not have access to surgical services. We accounted for uncertainty with oneway
sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation for missing data, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Findings At least 4·8 billion people (95% posterior credible interval 4·6–5·0 [67%, 64–70]) of the world’s population
do not have access to surgery. The proportion of the population without access varied widely when stratifi ed by
epidemiological region: greater than 95% of the population in south Asia and central, eastern, and western sub-
Saharan Africa do not have access to care, whereas less than 5% of the population in Australasia, high-income North
America, and western Europe lack access.
Interpretation Most of the world’s population does not have access to surgical care, and access is inequitably
distributed. The near absence of access in many low-income and middle-income countries represents a crisis, and as
the global health community continues to support the advancement of universal health coverage, increasing access to
surgical services will play a central role in ensuring health care for all
Rare missense functional variants at COL4A1 and COL4A2 in sporadic intracerebral Hhmorrhage
Objective:
To test the genetic contribution of rare missense variants in COL4A1 and COL4A2 in which common variants are genetically associated with sporadic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), we performed rare variant analysis in multiple sequencing data for the risk for sporadic ICH.
Methods:
We performed sequencing across 559Kbp at 13q34 including COL4A1 and COL4A2 among 2,133 individuals (1,055 ICH cases; 1,078 controls) in US-based and 1,492 individuals (192 ICH cases; 1,189 controls) from Scotland-based cohorts, followed by sequence annotation, functional impact prediction, genetic association testing, and in silico thermodynamic modeling.
Results:
We identified 107 rare nonsynonymous variants in sporadic ICH, of which two missense variants, rs138269346 (COL4A1I110T) and rs201716258 (COL4A2H203L), were predicted to be highly functional and occurred in multiple ICH cases but not in controls from the US-based cohort. The minor allele of rs201716258 was also present in Scottish ICH patients, and rs138269346 was observed in two ICH-free controls with a history of hypertension and myocardial infarction. Rs138269346 was nominally associated with non-lobar ICH risk (P=0.05), but not with lobar ICH (P=0.08), while associations between rs201716258 and ICH subtypes were non-significant (P>0.12). Both variants were considered pathogenic based on minor allele frequency (<0.00035 in EUR), predicted functional impact (deleterious or probably damaging), and in silico modeling studies (substantially altered physical length and thermal stability of collagen).
Conclusions:
We identified rare missense variants in COL4A1/A2 in association with sporadic ICH. Our annotation and simulation studies suggest that these variants are highly functional and may represent targets for translational follow-up
Acute flaccid myelitis:cause, diagnosis, and management
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a disabling, polio-like illness mainly affecting children. Outbreaks of MM have occurred across multiple global regions since 2012, and the disease appears to be caused by non-polio enterovirus infection, posing a major public health challenge. The clinical presentation of flaccid and often profound muscle weakness (which can invoke respiratory failure and other critical complications) can mimic several other acute neurological illnesses. There is no single sensitive and specific test for MM, and the diagnosis relies on identification of several important clinical, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid characteristics. Following the acute phase of AFM, patients typically have substantial residual disability and unique long-term rehabilitation needs. In this Review we describe the epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcomes of AFM to help to guide diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation. Future research directions include further studies evaluating host and pathogen factors, including investigations into genetic, viral, and immunological features of affected patients, host-virus interactions, and investigations of targeted therapeutic approaches to improve the long-term outcomes in this population
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gain-of-function mutations and disseminated coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis
Background: Impaired signaling in the IFN-g/IL-12 pathway causes susceptibility to severe disseminated infections with mycobacteria and dimorphic yeasts. Dominant gain-of-function mutations in signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) have been associated with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis.
Objective: We sought to identify the molecular defect in patients with disseminated dimorphic yeast infections.
Methods: PBMCs, EBV-transformed B cells, and transfected U3A cell lines were studied for IFN-g/IL-12 pathway function. STAT1 was sequenced in probands and available relatives. Interferon-induced STAT1 phosphorylation, transcriptional responses, protein-protein interactions, target gene activation, and function were investigated.
Results: We identified 5 patients with disseminated Coccidioides immitis or Histoplasma capsulatum with heterozygous missense mutations in the STAT1 coiled-coil or DNA-binding domains. These are dominant gain-of-function mutations causing enhanced STAT1 phosphorylation, delayed dephosphorylation, enhanced DNA binding and transactivation, and enhanced interaction with protein inhibitor of activated STAT1. The mutations caused enhanced IFN-g–induced gene expression, but we found impaired responses to IFN-g restimulation.
Conclusion: Gain-of-function mutations in STAT1 predispose to invasive, severe, disseminated dimorphic yeast infections, likely through aberrant regulation of IFN-g–mediated inflammationFil: Sampaio, Elizabeth P.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados Unidos. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Leprologia; BrasilFil: Hsu, Amy P.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Pechacek, Joseph. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Hannelore I.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados Unidos. Erasmus Medical Center. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease; PaÃses BajosFil: Dias, Dalton L.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Paulson, Michelle L.. Clinical Research Directorate/CMRP; Estados UnidosFil: Chandrasekaran, Prabha. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Rosen, Lindsey B.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Carvalho, Daniel S.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados Unidos. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratorio de Leprologia; BrasilFil: Ding, Li. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Vinh, Donald C.. McGill University Health Centre. Division of Infectious Diseases; CanadáFil: Browne, Sarah K.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Datta, Shrimati. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Allergic Diseases. Allergic Inflammation Unit; Estados UnidosFil: Milner, Joshua D.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Allergic Diseases. Allergic Inflammation Unit; Estados UnidosFil: Kuhns, Douglas B.. Clinical Services Program; Estados UnidosFil: Long Priel, Debra A.. Clinical Services Program; Estados UnidosFil: Sadat, Mohammed A.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Host Defenses. Infectious Diseases Susceptibility Unit; Estados UnidosFil: Shiloh, Michael. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Infectious Diseases; Estados UnidosFil: De Marco, Brendan. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Infectious Diseases; Estados UnidosFil: Alvares, Michael. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Allergy and Immunology; Estados UnidosFil: Gillman, Jason W.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Infectious Diseases; Estados UnidosFil: Ramarathnam, Vivek. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Infectious Diseases; Estados UnidosFil: de la Morena, Maite. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Allergy and Immunology; Estados UnidosFil: Bezrodnik, Liliana. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños "Ricardo Gutierrez"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Moreira, Ileana. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños "Ricardo Gutierrez"; ArgentinaFil: Uzel, Gulbu. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Johnson, Daniel. University of Chicago. Comer Children; Estados UnidosFil: Spalding, Christine. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Zerbe, Christa S.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados UnidosFil: Wiley, Henry. National Eye Institute. Clinical Trials Branch; Estados UnidosFil: Greenberg, David E.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center. Division of Infectious Diseases; Estados UnidosFil: Hoover, Susan E.. University of Arizona. College of Medicine. Valley Fever Center for Excellence; Estados UnidosFil: Rosenzweig, Sergio D.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Host Defenses Infectious Diseases Susceptibility Unit; Estados Unidos. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Primary Immunodeficiency Clinic; Estados UnidosFil: Galgiani, John N.. University of Arizona. College of Medicine. Valley Fever Center for Excellence; Estados UnidosFil: Holland, Steven M.. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Immunopathogenesis Section; Estados Unido
HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS, RELATIVE ABUNDANCE, AND SPECIES RICHNESS OF AUTUMN LANDBIRD MIGRANTS IN SOUTHWESTERN IDAHO
The Effectiveness and Micro-costing Analysis of a Universal, School-Based, Social–Emotional Learning Programme in the UK: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial
There are a growing number of school-based interventions designed to promote children’s social and emotional learning. One such intervention, PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies), was evaluated in a randomised controlled trial involving 5074 pupils aged 4–6 years at baseline in 56 primary schools across a large city in the UK. The programme was implemented for two academic years. The primary outcome measure was the teacher-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). A secondary measure was the PATHS Teacher Rating Scale (PTRS). Observations of child and teacher behaviours were undertaken in a third of intervention and control schools using the Teacher–Pupil Observation Tool (T-POT). Regarding fidelity, dose and adherence were measured via weekly logs completed by teachers, and a semi-structured questionnaire completed by PATHS coaches was used as a global measure of fidelity (capturing adherence, dose and quality). A cost-consequence analysis examined programme costs from a multi-agency public sector perspective. At 1 year post-baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the programme and control groups on the SDQ subscales or the SDQ total difficulties and impact scores. There were statistically significant differences favouring the programme group for six out of 11 subscales on the secondary outcome measure (PTRS). At 2 years post-baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups on either measure. Fidelity, according to the global measure, was relatively strong, and there was no relationship between fidelity and treatment effects. The average cost of PATHS was £12,666 per school or £139 per child. The study, which was fully powered and independent of the programme developer, shows no statistically significant effect of the programme on child behaviour or emotional well-being. Trial registration site and number: www.controlled-trials.com: ISRCTN 32534848
Mainstreaming the Social Sciences in Conservation
Despite broad recognition of the value of social sciences and increasingly vocal calls for better engagement with the human element of conservation, the conservation social sciences remain misunderstood and underutilized in practice. The conservation social sciences can provide unique and important contributions to society's understanding of the relationships between humans and nature and to improving conservation practice and outcomes. There are 4 barriers—ideological, institutional, knowledge, and capacity—to meaningful integration of the social sciences into conservation. We provide practical guidance on overcoming these barriers to mainstream the social sciences in conservation science, practice, and policy. Broadly, we recommend fostering knowledge on the scope and contributions of the social sciences to conservation, including social scientists from the inception of interdisciplinary research projects, incorporating social science research and insights during all stages of conservation planning and implementation, building social science capacity at all scales in conservation organizations and agencies, and promoting engagement with the social sciences in and through global conservation policy-influencing organizations. Conservation social scientists, too, need to be willing to engage with natural science knowledge and to communicate insights and recommendations clearly. We urge the conservation community to move beyond superficial engagement with the conservation social sciences. A more inclusive and integrative conservation science—one that includes the natural and social sciences—will enable more ecologically effective and socially just conservation. Better collaboration among social scientists, natural scientists, practitioners, and policy makers will facilitate a renewed and more robust conservation. Mainstreaming the conservation social sciences will facilitate the uptake of the full range of insights and contributions from these fields into conservation policy and practice
- …