De teelt van houtig kleinfruit

De teelt en rassen van rode (ook onder glas) en zwarte bessen, kruisbes, framboos en bramen wordt uitgebreid beschreven. Daarnaast is er een hoofdstuk met een korte beschrijving van de teelt van blauwe bes, rozebottel, Loganbes, Taybes, witte bes, Japanse wijnbes, Boysenbes, Jostabes en Worcesterbes. Areaalcijfers van 1960 tot 1982. Productie, in- en uitvoer van 1974-1982. Prijzen van 1974 en 1975. De bestemming voor verwerking van 1965 tot 197

Informações on-line como suporte às famílias de crianças e adolescentes com doença crônica

RESUMO Objetivo Descrever o uso de informações on-line como suporte às famílias de crianças e adolescentes com doença crônica. Método Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa realizada no mês de agosto de 2015, com busca on-line nas bases de dados: PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature e Science Direct. Resultados Foram selecionados doze estudos de 293 encontrados. Após análise, elencaram-se duas categorias: Potencialidades do uso de informações on-line às famílias de crianças e adolescentes com doença crônica e Fragilidades do uso de informações on-line às famílias de crianças e adolescentes com doença crônica. Conclusões A Internet oferece amplitude de informações que subsidiam as famílias no gerenciamento do cuidado às crianças e aos adolescentes com enfermidades crônicas, no entanto, ainda possui particularidades que precisam ser analisadas durante a utilização desta rede virtual

De teelt van houtig kleinfruit

De teelt en rassen van rode (ook onder glas) en zwarte bessen, kruisbes, framboos en bramen wordt uitgebreid beschreven. Daarnaast is er een hoofdstuk met een korte beschrijving van de teelt van blauwe bes, rozebottel, Loganbes, Taybes, witte bes, Japanse wijnbes, Boysenbes, Jostabes en Worcesterbes. Areaalcijfers van 1960 tot 1982. Productie, in- en uitvoer van 1974-1982. Prijzen van 1974 en 1975. De bestemming voor verwerking van 1965 tot 197

Evidence-based interventions to reduce adverse events in hospitals: a systematic review of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of effective interventions aimed at reducing rates of adverse events in hospitals. DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched for systematic reviews published until October 2015. STUDY SELECTION: English-language systematic reviews of interventions aimed at reducing adverse events in hospitals, including studies with an experimental design and reporting adverse event rates, were included. Two reviewers independently assessed each study's quality and extracted data on the study population, study design, intervention characteristics and adverse patient outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty systematic reviews with moderate to high quality were included. Statistically significant pooled effect sizes were found for 14 types of interventions, including: (1) multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium; (2) rapid response teams to reduce cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality rates; (3) pharmacist interventions to reduce adverse drug events; (4) exercises and multicomponent interventions to prevent falls; and (5) care bundle interventions, checklists and reminders to reduce infections. Most (82%) of the significant effect sizes were based on 5 or fewer primary studies with an experimental study design. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for patient-safety interventions implemented in hospitals worldwide is weak. The findings address the need to invest in high-quality research standards in order to identify interventions that have a real impact on patient safety. Interventions to prevent delirium, cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality, adverse drug events, infections and falls are most effective and should therefore be prioritised by clinicians

Evidence-based interventions to reduce adverse events in hospitals: a systematic review of systematic reviews

To provide an overview of effective interventions aimed at reducing rates of adverse events in hospitals.Systematic review of systematic reviews.PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched for systematic reviews published until October 2015.English-language systematic reviews of interventions aimed at reducing adverse events in hospitals, including studies with an experimental design and reporting adverse event rates, were included. Two reviewers independently assessed each study's quality and extracted data on the study population, study design, intervention characteristics and adverse patient outcomes.Sixty systematic reviews with moderate to high quality were included. Statistically significant pooled effect sizes were found for 14 types of interventions, including: (1) multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium; (2) rapid response teams to reduce cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality rates; (3) pharmacist interventions to reduce adverse drug events; (4) exercises and multicomponent interventions to prevent falls; and (5) care bundle interventions, checklists and reminders to reduce infections. Most (82%) of the significant effect sizes were based on 5 or fewer primary studies with an experimental study design.The evidence for patient-safety interventions implemented in hospitals worldwide is weak. The findings address the need to invest in high-quality research standards in order to identify interventions that have a real impact on patient safety. Interventions to prevent delirium, cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality, adverse drug events, infections and falls are most effective and should therefore be prioritised by clinicians

'Reframing Healthcare Services through the Lens of Co-Production' (RheLaunCh): a study protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of mechanisms by which healthcare and social services impact the health and well-being of patients with COPD and CHF in the USA and The Netherlands

Contains fulltext : 177297.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)INTRODUCTION: The USA lags behind other high-income countries in many health indicators. Outcome differences are associated with differences in the relative spending between healthcare and social services at the national level. The impact of the ratio and delivery of social and healthcare services on the individual patient's health is however unknown. 'Reframing Healthcare Services through the Lens of Co-Production' (RheLaunCh) will be a cross-Atlantic comparative study of the mechanisms by which healthcare and social service delivery may impact patient health with chronic conditions. Insight into these mechanisms is needed to better and cost-effectively organise healthcare and social services. METHODS: We designed a mixed methods study to compare the socioeconomic background, needs of and service delivery to patients with congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the USA and the Netherlands. We will conduct: (1) a literature scan to compare national and regional healthcare and social service systems; (2) a retrospective database study to compare patient's socioeconomic and clinical characteristics and the service use and spending at the national, regional and hospital level; (3) a survey to compare patient perceived quality of life, receipt and experience of service delivery and ability of these services to meet patient needs; and (4) multiple case studies to understand what patients need to better govern their quality of life and how needs are met by services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the ethics committee of the Radboud University Medical Center (2016-2423) in the Netherlands and by the Human Subjects Research Committee of the Hennepin Health Care System, Inc. (HSR #16-4230) in the USA. Multiple approaches will be used for dissemination of results, including (inter)national research presentations and peer-reviewed publications. A website will be established to support the development of a community of practice