Biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: microbiota composition, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal permeability

5 figures, 1 table.There is evidence of the influence of the intestinal microbiota on the response to immunotherapy in cancer. In addition, we lack markers of response to treatment and toxicity, which obliges us to continue our search for them. In this work, we recruited patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy who contributed a fecal and blood sample. We analyzed the possible relationship between the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events, the composition (16S rDNA amplification) and functionality (abundance of short-chain fatty acids) of the gut microbiota, and intestinal membrane permeability as a human factor. No correlations were detected between analytical markers and clinical evolution, with a marked individuality of the gut microbiota in terms of composition, but homogeneity in its functionality and permeability. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been proposed as the standard treatment for different stages of non-small-cell lung cancer in multiple indications. Not all patients benefit from these treatments, however, and certain patients develop immune-related adverse events. Although the search for predictors of response to these drugs is a major field of research, these issues have yet to be resolved. It has been postulated that microbiota could play a relevant role in conditioning the response to cancer treatments; however, the human factor of intestinal permeability also needs to be considered as it is closely related to the regulation of host–microbiota interaction. In this article, we analyzed the possible relationship between the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the onset of immune-related adverse events, gut microbiota status, and intestinal membrane permeability. In a pioneering step, we also measured short-chain fatty acid content in feces. Although the correlation analyses failed to identify predictive biomarkers, even when all variables were integrated, our patients’ microbial gut ecosystems were rich and diverse, and the intestinal barrier’s integrity was preserved. These results add new knowledge on the composition of microbiota and its correlation with barrier permeability and short-chain fatty acids and suggest that more studies are required before these potential biomarkers can be incorporated into the clinical management of patients via immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.This study was supported by CIBER—Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—(CB 2021); Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Unión Europea—NextGenerationEU; FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional), Gobierno de Aragón (Group B29_23R); Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación e Universidades (MCNU); and Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2020-113963RB-I00). It was also supported by a Personalized and Precision Medicine grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (MePRAM Project, PMP22/00092), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, and funded by NextGenerationEU funds from the European Union that finance the actions of the Resilience and Recovery Facility.Peer reviewe

Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy:Study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)

This study was funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias ISCIII (Grant Numbers PI15/00276, PI15/00572, PI15/00996), REDISSEC (Project Numbers RD12/0001/0012, RD16/0001/0005), and the European Regional Development Fund ("A way to build Europe").Background: Multimorbidity is associated with negative effects both on people's health and on healthcare systems. A key problem linked to multimorbidity is polypharmacy, which in turn is associated with increased risk of partly preventable adverse effects, including mortality. The Ariadne principles describe a model of care based on a thorough assessment of diseases, treatments (and potential interactions), clinical status, context and preferences of patients with multimorbidity, with the aim of prioritizing and sharing realistic treatment goals that guide an individualized management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that implements the Ariadne principles in a population of young-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The intervention seeks to improve the appropriateness of prescribing in primary care (PC), as measured by the medication appropriateness index (MAI) score at 6 and 12months, as compared with usual care. Methods/Design: Design:pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. Unit of randomization: family physician (FP). Unit of analysis: patient. Scope: PC health centres in three autonomous communities: Aragon, Madrid, and Andalusia (Spain). Population: patients aged 65-74years with multimorbidity (≥3 chronic diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs prescribed in ≥3months). Sample size: n=400 (200 per study arm). Intervention: complex intervention based on the implementation of the Ariadne principles with two components: (1) FP training and (2) FP-patient interview. Outcomes: MAI score, health services use, quality of life (Euroqol 5D-5L), pharmacotherapy and adherence to treatment (Morisky-Green, Haynes-Sackett), and clinical and socio-demographic variables. Statistical analysis: primary outcome is the difference in MAI score between T0 and T1 and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Adjustment for confounding factors will be performed by multilevel analysis. All analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: It is essential to provide evidence concerning interventions on PC patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, conducted in the context of routine clinical practice, and involving young-old patients with significant potential for preventing negative health outcomes. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02866799Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Mirando a África

Este proyecto pretende acercar a la comunidad educativa del centro una realidad tan próxima, compleja y dramática como la del continente africano, desde casi todas las materias. Y pretende hacerlo en coherencia con valores que identifican al centro. Los objetivos son fomentar la colaboración y participación de los alumnos intercambiando sus propias experiencias; potenciar una conciencia social y ecológica; formar integralmente a los alumnos para el mejor desarrollo de la sociedad; valorar la utilidad de la enseñanza activa y el aprendizaje cooperativo; diseñar actividades que permitan desarrollar una enseñanza interdisciplinar; posibilitar que los alumnos desarrollen estrategias globalizadoras de organización del conocimiento mediante el tratamiento de la información; favorecer el aprendizaje significativo; animar al profesorado a buscar estrategias que favorezcan la actividad didáctica; fomentar la lectura y el uso correcto de la expresión oral y escrita, además de mejorar la ortografía; extender el conocimiento y la utilización de las nuevas tecnologías de la información y la comunicación; estrechar las relaciones entre los diferentes sectores de la comunidad educativa; fomentar la participación activa en la vida social; mejorar la convivencia en el centro; desarrollar hábitos de vida saludables; provocar en los alumnos una visión positiva del centro como lugar de ocio y de enriquecimiento cultural; desarrollar y favorecer las inquietudes culturales de los alumnos; desarrollar las actitudes positivas hacia otras culturas; extender el conocimiento de lenguas extranjeras y mantener relaciones estables de colaboración con instituciones culturales y sociales. Las actividades desarrolladas se organizan en tres modalidades que son actividades globales que implican a toda la comunidad educativa como un concurso de lectura llamado África desde la biblioteca, el día del Libro, viaje de fin de curso a Túnez, apadrinar una escuela en Marruecos, una jornada cultural antes de las vacaciones de Semana Santa, talleres a cargo de la Fundación Yehudi Menuhin y Hora 31 con ciclos de charlas y conferencias; actividades durante el horario lectivo en los distintos departamentos didácticos como proyecciones de películas, composición de textos, debates y trabajos en equipo; y las actividades realizadas fuera del horario lectivo como son talleres, cineclub, coloquios, exposiciones, actividades de cooperación y asistir a diversos espectáculos. La metodología es diversa, en relación con la pluralidad de actividades que se llevan a cabo. Como indicadores del proceso de evaluación se toman para las actividades del currículo, la propia evaluación de profesores. Aunque es un indicador cuantitativo para el análisis final y junto a otros parámetros, se trabaja también la evaluación cualitativa, para que las conclusiones tengan un carácter más global de los resultados del proyecto. Por el contrario, las actividades que se realizan fuera del horario lectivo se miden con el grado de participación. Además como herramienta de evaluación individual se elaboran encuestas para alumnos y profesores para que reflejen sus opiniones personales sobre el proyecto. Se adjunta como anexo dos CD-ROM y cuestionarios..Madrid (Comunidad Autónoma). Consejería de Educación. Dirección General de Mejora de la Calidad de la EnseñanzaMadridMadrid (Comunidad Autónoma). Subdirección General de Formación del Profesorado. CRIF Las Acacias; General Ricardos 179 - 28025 Madrid; Tel. + 34915250893ES