34 research outputs found
Changes in Access to Health Services of the Immigrant and Native-Born Population in Spain in the Context of Economic Crisis
Aim: To analyze changes in access to health care and its determinants in the immigrant and native-born populations in Spain, before and during the economic crisis. Methods: Comparative analysis of two iterations of the Spanish National Health Survey (2006 and 2012). Outcome variables were: unmet need and use of different healthcare levels; explanatory variables: need, predisposing and enabling factors. Multivariate models were performed (1) to compare outcome variables in each group between years, (2) to compare outcome variables between both groups within each year, and (3) to determine the factors associated with health service use for each group and year. Results: unmet healthcare needs decreased in 2012 compared to 2006; the use of health services remained constant, with some changes worth highlighting, such as the decline in general practitioner visits among autochthons and a narrowed gap in specialist visits between the two populations. The factors associated with health service use in 2006 remained constant in 2012. Conclusion: Access to healthcare did not worsen, possibly due to the fact that, until 2012, the national health system may have cushioned the deterioration of social determinants as a consequence of the financial crisis. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effects of health policy responses to the crisis after 2012
Inequities in access to health care in different health systems: A study in municipalities of central Colombia and north-eastern Brazil
Introduction. Health system reforms are undertaken with the aim of improving equity of access to health care. Their impact is generally analyzed based on health care utilization, without distinguishing between levels of care. This study aims to analyze inequities in access to the continuum of care in municipalities of Brazil and Colombia. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted based on a survey of a multistage probability sample of people who had had at least one health problem in the prior three months (2,163 in Colombia and 2,167 in Brazil). The outcome variables were dichotomous variables on the utilization of curative and preventive services. The main independent variables were income, being the holder of a private health plan and, in Colombia, type of insurance scheme of the General System of Social Security in Health (SGSSS). For each country, the prevalence of the outcome variables was calculated overall and stratified by levels of per capita income, SGSSS insurance schemes and private health plan. Prevalence ratios were computed by means of Poisson regression models with robust variance, controlling for health care need. Results: There are inequities in favor of individuals of a higher socioeconomic status: in Colombia, in the three different care levels (primary, outpatient secondary and emergency care) and preventive activities; and in Brazil, in the use of outpatient secondary care services and preventive activities, whilst lower-income individuals make greater use of the primary care services. In both countries, inequity in the use of outpatient secondary care is more pronounced than in the other care levels. Income in both countries, insurance scheme enrollment in Colombia and holding a private health plan in Brazil all contribute to the presence of inequities in utilization. Conclusions: Twenty years after the introduction of reforms implemented to improve equity in access to health care, inequities, defined in terms of unequal use for equal need, are still present in both countries. The design of the health systems appears to determine access to the health services: two insurance schemes in Colombia with different benefits packages and a segmented system in Brazil, with a significant private component. © 2014 Garcia-Subirats et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
ICO-ICS Praxis para el tratamiento médico y con irradiación de cáncer colorrectal
Tractament mèdic; Tractament amb irradiació; Còlon; Recte; Cà ncerMedical treatment; Irradiation treatment; Colon; Rectum; CancerTratamiento médico; Tratamiento con irradiación; Colon; Recto; CáncerEl cà ncer de còlon i recte (CCR) és el més freqüent a Catalunya segons dades del Pla director d’oncologia estimades per a 2017. La incidència del CCR és superior en homes, amb un increment anual de l'1,3% en els homes i el 0,5% en les dones des de 1994. A Espanya, segons l’informe de la SEOM, que recull dades de la REDECAN, posiciona el CCR com un dels més freqüents i probables de diagnosticar el 2019, amb 44.937 nous casos. Segons les dades dels registres de GLOBOCAN 2018, el CCR és el segon cà ncer amb més incidència a Europa. La incidència distribuïda per sexes és del 16,7% en homes i del 13,3% en dones. Els objectius d'aquesta guia són: -Desenvolupar, difondre, implementar i avaluar resultats de la ICO-ICSPraxi de cà ncer colorectal. -Disminuir la variabilitat terapèutica entre els pacients tractats als diferents centres d'aquesta institució. -Implementar els resultats de la terapèutica en els pacients amb adenocarcinoma de pà ncrees tractats d'acord amb les recomanacions d'aquesta guia
Adaptación y validación de la escala CCAENA© para evaluar la continuidad asistencial entre niveles de atención en Colombia y Brasil
Objetivo: Adaptar y validar la escala del Cuestionario de Continuidad Asistencial Entre Niveles de Atención (CCAENA©) en el contexto de los sistemas de salud colombiano y brasileño.
MĂ©todos: El estudio consistiĂł en dos fases: 1) adaptaciĂłn de la escala CCAENA© al contexto de cada paĂs mediante dos pretests y una prueba piloto; y 2) validaciĂłn mediante la aplicaciĂłn de la escala en una encuesta poblacional en Colombia y Brasil. Se analizaron las siguientes propiedades psicomĂ©tricas: validez de constructo (análisis factorial), consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach; correlaciones Ătem-resto), multidimensionalidad de las escalas (coeficientes de correlaciĂłn de Spearman) y análisis de grupos conocidos (test de ji al cuadrado).
Resultados: Se seleccionaron 14 de los 21 Ătems de la escala original y se reformularon pasando de una afirmaciĂłn con opciones de respuesta de acuerdo a una pregunta con opciones de respuesta de frecuencia. El análisis factorial mostrĂł que los Ătems se agrupan en tres factores: continuidad entre niveles asistenciales, continuidad de relaciĂłn con el proveedor de atenciĂłn primaria y continuidad de relaciĂłn con el proveedor de atenciĂłn especializada. El alfa de Cronbach indicĂł una buena concordancia interna (>0,80 en todas las escalas). Los coeficientes de correlaciĂłn indican que los tres factores pueden interpretarse como escalas separadas (<0,70) y presentan una adecuada capacidad de diferenciar entre grupos.
Conclusiones: La versiĂłn adaptada del CCAENA© muestra adecuadas validez y fiabilidad en ambos paĂses, manteniendo una alta equivalencia con la versiĂłn original. Es una herramienta Ăştil y viable para evaluar la continuidad asistencial entre niveles asistenciales desde la perspectiva del usuario en ambos contextos
Erratum to: Neighborhood Inequalities in Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in an Urban Setting in Spain: A Multilevel Approach
Health inequality between immigrants and natives in Spain: the loss of the healthy immigrant effect in times of economic crisis
Background: The immigrant population living in Spain grew exponentially in the early 2000s but has been particularly affected by the economic crisis. This study aims to analyse health inequalities between immigrants born in middle- or low-income countries and natives in Spain, in 2006 and 2012, taking into account gender, year of arrival and socioeconomic exposures. Methods: Study of trends using two cross-sections, the 2006 and 2012 editions of the Spanish National Health Survey, including residents in Spain aged 15–64 years (20 810 natives and 2950 immigrants in 2006, 14 291 natives and 2448 immigrants in 2012). Fair/poor self-rated health, poor mental health (GHQ-12 > 2), chronic activity limitation and use of psychotropic drugs were compared between natives and immigrants who arrived in Spain before 2006, adjusting robust Poisson regression models for age and socioeconomic variables to obtain prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Inequalities in poor self-rated health between immigrants and natives tend to increase among women (age-adjusted PR2006 = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.24–1.56, PR2012 = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.33–1.82). Among men, there is a new onset of inequalities in poor mental health (PR2006 = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.86–1.40, PR2012 = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06–1.69) and an equalization of the previously lower use of psychotropic drugs (PR2006 = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.11–0.43, PR2012 = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.73–2.01). Conclusions: Between 2006 and 2012, immigrants who arrived in Spain before 2006 appeared to worsen their health status when compared with natives. The loss of the healthy immigrant effect in the context of a worse impact of the economic crisis on immigrants appears as potential explanation. Employment, social protection and re-universalization of healthcare would prevent further deterioration of immigrants’ health status.This research was partially supported by the CIBER EpidemiologĂa y Salud PĂşblica Subprogram on Immigration and Health and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 278173 (SOPHIE project)
Adaptación y validación de la escala CCAENA© para evaluar la continuidad asistencial entre niveles de atención en Colombia y Brasil
Impact of a community contraceptive counselling intervention on adolescent fertility rates: a quasi-experimental study
Background: From 2000 to 2008, in urban areas in Spain, adolescent fertility and abortion rates underwent unprecedented increases, consecutive to intensive immigration from developing countries. To address unmet needs for contraception information and services, a community-based, gender-sensitive and culturally adapted brief counselling intervention (SIRIAN program) was launched in some deprived neighbourhoods with a high proportion of immigrants in Barcelona. Once a randomized controlled trial demonstrated its effectiveness in increasing the use of contraceptives, we aim to examine its population impact on adolescent fertility rates. Methods: Quasi-experimental study with comparison group, using population data from 2005 to 2016. Five neighbourhoods in the lowest tercile of Disposable Household Income were intervened in 2011-13. The comparison group included the three neighbourhoods which were in the same municipal district and in the lowest Disposable Household Income tercile, and displayed the highest adolescent fertility rates. Generalized linear models were fitted to assess absolute adolescent fertility rates and adjusted by immigrant population between pre-intervention (2005-10) and post-intervention periods (2011-16); Difference in Differences and relative pre-post changes analysis were performed. Results: In 2005-10 the intervention group adolescent fertility rate was 27.90 (per 1000 women 15-19) and 21.84 in the comparison group. In 2011-16 intervention areas experienced great declines (adolescent fertility rate change: - 12.30 (- 12.45 to - 12.21); p < 0.001), while comparison neighbourhoods remained unchanged (adolescent fertility rate change: 1.91 (- 2.25 to 6.07); p = 0.368). A reduction of - 10.97 points (- 13.91 to - 8.03); p < 0.001) is associated to the intervention. Conclusion: Adolescent fertility rate significantly declined in the intervention group but remained stable in the comparison group. This quasi-experimental study provide evidence that, in a country with universal health coverage, a community counselling intervention that increases access to contraception, knowledge and sexual health care in hard-to-reach segments of the population can contribute to substantially reduce adolescent fertility rates. Reducing adolescent fertility rates could become a feasible goal in cities with similar conditions