44 research outputs found

    How often do we identify fetal abnormalities during routine third‐trimester ultrasound? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Get PDF
    Background Routine third‐trimester ultrasound is frequently offered to pregnant women to identify fetuses with abnormal growth. Infrequently, a congenital anomaly is incidentally detected. Objective To establish the prevalence and type of fetal anomalies detected during routine third‐trimester scans using a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Search strategy Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library) from inception until August 2019. Selection criteria Population‐based studies (randomised control trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts) reporting abnormalities detected at the routine third‐trimester ultrasound performed in unselected populations with prior screening. Case reports, case series, case‐control studies and reviews without original data were excluded. Data collection and analysis Prevalence and type of anomalies detected in the third trimester. We calculated pooled prevalence as the number of anomalies per 1000 scans with 95% confidence intervals. Publication bias was assessed. Main results The literature search identified 9594 citations: 13 studies were eligible representing 141 717 women; 643 were diagnosed with an unexpected abnormality. The pooled prevalence of a new abnormality diagnosed was 3.68 per 1000 women scanned (95% CI 2.72–4.78). The largest groups of abnormalities were urogenital (55%), central nervous system abnormalities (18%) and cardiac abnormalities (14%). Conclusion Combining data from 13 studies and over 140 000 women, we show that during routine third‐trimester ultrasound, an incidental fetal anomaly will be found in about 1 in 300 scanned women. This information should be taken into account when taking consent from women for third‐trimester ultrasound and when designing and assessing cost of third‐trimester ultrasound screening programmes

    Immunoregulation in human malaria: the challenge of understanding asymptomatic infection

    Full text link

    International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis

    Get PDF
    Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS
    corecore