La ética antropológica de Hans Jonas en el horizonte de la fenomenología hermenéutica

La ética de Hans Jonas es una de las grandes propuestas morales de nuestra época. En estas páginas quisiera indicar brevemente algunas consideraciones para comprender de una forma más adecuada su pensamiento. Dos tesis se defenderán: 1) su planteamiento no es antropocéntrico, pero sí antropológico; se trata de una ética antropológica de la responsabilidad, y 2) es una propuesta que merece situarse en la perspectiva de la fenomenología hermenéutica.The ethics of Hans Jonas is one of the great moral proposals of our time. In these pages I would like to indicate briefly some considerations to understand his thought in a more suitable form. Two theses will be defended: 1) his exposition is not anthropocentric, but anthropological; it is an anthropological ethics of responsibility, and 2) it is a proposal that deserves to be located in the perspective of the phenomenological hermeneutics

Hermeneutics of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss: An Alternative Approach Toward Quranic Studies

This research attempts to offer hermeneutics of reception by Hans Robert Jauss as an alternative to understanding the Quran. Starting from the concern of some contemporary Islamic thinkers about the limitations of the classical Quran in overcoming human problems that are always dynamic, hermeneutics has become a much-demanded approach. In addition, the methodological principle of classical interpretation tends to forget the role of human participation in interpreting the Quran. Nevertheless, the practice of the reception approach has stagnated in the study of the living Quran, which only performs a simple analysis of a tradition into three reception typologies: exegesis, functional, and aesthetic, without any more profound critique. This article aims to describe Hans Robert Jauss’ hermeneutics of reception as a relevant offer to fill the void of Quranic studies from the reader's perspective. For this reason, this article is compiled using qualitative methods based on literature studies so that essential aspects that need to be considered as material for hermeneutics of reception analysis can be well elaborated. There are three crucial aspects to the hermeneutics of reception; the Horizon of expectations, the three levels of reading, and the validity of the aesthetic experience

Hermeneutics of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss: An Alternative Approach Toward Quranic Studies

This research attempts to offer hermeneutics of reception by Hans Robert Jauss as an alternative to understanding the Quran. Starting from the concern of some contemporary Islamic thinkers about the limitations of the classical Quran in overcoming human problems that are always dynamic, hermeneutics has become a much-demanded approach. In addition, the methodological principle of classical interpretation tends to forget the role of human participation in interpreting the Quran. Nevertheless, the practice of the reception approach has stagnated in the study of the living Quran, which only performs a simple analysis of a tradition into three reception typologies: exegesis, functional, and aesthetic, without any more profound critique. This article aims to describe Hans Robert Jauss’ hermeneutics of reception as a relevant offer to fill the void of Quranic studies from the reader's perspective. For this reason, this article is compiled using qualitative methods based on literature studies so that essential aspects that need to be considered as material for hermeneutics of reception analysis can be well elaborated. There are three crucial aspects to the hermeneutics of reception; the Horizon of expectations, the three levels of reading, and the validity of the aesthetic experience

Experiencia estética y hermenéutica literaria

Je cherche à dégager dans cet article le lien qui relie la théorie de la réception de H.-R. Jauss à l’herméneutique philosophique de Gadamer. Or, c’est la théorie kantienne du jugement de goût qui fait apparaître avec le plus d’acuité la distance qui sépare au départ les deux auteurs. Jauss fonde en effet son projet sur l’approche moderne de l’art, ce qui va de pair selon Gadamer avec l’« abstraction de la conscience esthétique ». On sait que Gadamer critique cette conscience, qui trouve son expression paradigmatique dans l’esthétique de Kant, au motif qu’elle se coupe de la dimension pratique de l’œuvre et de sa teneur de vérité. Dès lors, la tâche qui s’impose consiste pour Jauss à surmonter la césure entraînée par cette conscience abstraite, axée sur un sentiment de plaisir (aisthesis), afin de rendre féconde pour le monde vécu la réception de l’œuvre d’art, comme le veut Gadamer.The aim of this article is to investigate the link between H.-R. Jauss’s theory of reception and the philosophical hermeneutics of Gadamer. Yet it is Kant’s theory of the judgment of taste that is best suited to show the distance that separates the two authors from the start. Jauss grounds his project on the modern approach to art, which implies what Gadamer characterizes as the “abstraction of aesthetic consciousness.” We know that Gadamer condemns this consciousness, which finds its paradigmatic expression in Kant’s aesthetics, because this consciousness deprives itself of the practical dimension of the work and of its truth. The task for Jauss then is to overcome the loss entailed by such an abstract consciousness, which consists in a feeling of pleasure (aesthesis), in order for the reception of the work of art to be fruitful for the lifeworld, as Gadamer would expect