Treatment of spontaneous preterm labour with retosiban: a phase 2 proof-of-concept study

This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at doi: 10.1111/bcp.12646. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous retosiban in women with spontaneous preterm labour. METHODS: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Retosiban was administered intravenously for 48 hours to women in spontaneous preterm labour between 30(0/7) and 35(6/7)  weeks' gestation with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy in an in-patient obstetric unit. Outcome measures were uterine quiescence (primary endpoint), days to delivery, preterm delivery, and safety. RESULTS: Uterine quiescence was achieved in 62% of women who received retosiban (n = 30) compared with 41% who received placebo (n = 34). The relative risk (RR) was 1.53 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.98, 2.48; NS). Retosiban resulted in a significant increase in time to delivery compared with placebo (mean difference, 8.2 days; 95% CrI: 2.7, 13.74); this difference was consistent across all gestational ages. The proportion of preterm births in the retosiban and placebo groups was 18.7% (95% CrI: 7.4%, 33.7%) and 47.2% (95% CrI: 31.4%, 63.4%), respectively. The RR of preterm birth in women treated with retosiban was 0.38 (95% CrI: 0.15, 0.81). There were no deliveries within 7 days in the retosiban group, but there were six (17.6%) births in the placebo group. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal adverse events were similar in the retosiban and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administration of retosiban in women with spontaneous preterm labour was associated with a greater than 1-week increase in time to delivery compared with placebo, a significant reduction in preterm deliveries, a non-significant increase in uterine quiescence, and a favourable safety profile.GlaxoSmithKlin

Functionally selective inhibition of the oxytocin receptor by retosiban in human myometrial smooth muscle

Context: Novel small molecule inhibitors of the oxytocin receptor (OTR) may have distinct pharmacology and mode of action when compared to first generation oxytocin antagonists when used for the prevention of preterm birth. Objective: To determine the mechanism of action of small molecule OTR antagonists retosiban and epelsiban in comparison to the currently used peptide-based compound atosiban. Design: Human myometrial samples were obtained at cesarean section and subjected to pharmacological manipulations to establish the effect of antagonist binding to OTR on downstream signaling. Results: Retosiban antagonism of oxytocin action in human myometrium was potent, rapid and reversible. Inhibition of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) production followed single site competitive binding kinetics for epelsiban, retosiban and atosiban. Retosiban inhibited basal production of IP3 in the absence of oxytocin. Oxytocin and atosiban, but not retosiban inhibited forskolin and calcitonin stimulated cAMP production. Inhibition of cAMP was reversed by pertussis toxin. Oxytocin and atosiban, but not retosiban and epelsiban, stimulated ERK1/2 activity in a time a concentration dependent manner. Oxytocin and atosiban stimulated cyclo oxygenase 2 (COX2) activity and subsequent production of prostaglandin E2 and F2α. Prostaglandin production was inhibited by rofecoxib, pertussin toxin, and ERK inhibitor U0126. Oxytocin but not retosiban or atosiban stimulated coupling of the OTR to Gαq G-proteins. Oxytocin and atosiban but not retosiban stimulated coupling of the OTR to Gαi G-proteins. Conclusions: Retosiban and epelsiban demonstrate distinct pharmacology when compared to atosiban in human myometrial smooth muscle. Atosiban displays agonist activity at micromolar concentrations leading to stimulation of prostaglandin production

Respiratory effects of biased ligand oliceridine in older volunteers: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison with morphine

Background: Oliceridine is a G protein–biased μ-opioid, a drug class thatis associated with less respiratory depression than nonbiased opioids, suchas morphine. The authors quantified the respiratory effects of oliceridine andmorphine in elderly volunteers. The authors hypothesized that these opioidsdiffer in their pharmacodynamic behavior, measured as effect on ventilation atan extrapolated end-tidal Pco2 at 55 mmHg, V̇E55.Methods: This four-arm double-blind, randomized, crossover study examinedthe respiratory effects of intravenous 0.5 or 2 mg oliceridine and 2 or8 mg morphine in 18 healthy male and female volunteers, aged 55 to 89 yr, onfour separate occasions. Participants’ CYP2D6 genotypes were determined,hypercapnic ventilatory responses were obtained, and arterial blood sampleswere collected before and for 6 h after treatment. A population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis was performed on V̇E55, the primary endpoint;values reported are median ± standard error of the estimate.Results: Oliceridine at low dose was devoid of significant respiratory effects.High-dose oliceridine and both morphine doses caused a rapid onset of respiratorydepression with peak effects occurring at 0.5 to 1 h after opioid dosing.After peak effect, compared with morphine, respiratory depression inducedby oliceridine returned faster to baseline. The effect-site concentrationscausing a 50% depression of V̇E55 were 29.9 ± 3.5 ng/ml (oliceridine) and21.5 ± 4.6 ng/ml (morphine), the blood effect-site equilibration half-lives differedby a factor of 5: oliceridine 44.3 ± 6.1 min and morphine 214 ± 27 min.Three poor CYP2D6 oliceridine metabolizers exhibited a significant differencein oliceridine clearance by about 50%, causing higher oliceridine plasma concentrationsafter both low- and high-dose oliceridine, compared with the otherparticipants.Conclusions: Oliceridine and morphine differ in their respiratory pharmacodynamicswith a more rapid onset and offset of respiratory depression foroliceridine and a smaller magnitude of respiratory depression over time.Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcome (Anesthesiology/Intensive Care

Intraspecies Variation in the Emergence of Hyperinfectious Bacterial Strains in Nature

Salmonella is a principal health concern because of its endemic prevalence in food and water supplies, the rise in incidence of multi-drug resistant strains, and the emergence of new strains associated with increased disease severity. Insights into pathogen emergence have come from animal-passage studies wherein virulence is often increased during infection. However, these studies did not address the prospect that a select subset of strains undergo a pronounced increase in virulence during the infective process- a prospect that has significant implications for human and animal health. Our findings indicate that the capacity to become hypervirulent (100-fold decreased LD50) was much more evident in certain S. enterica strains than others. Hyperinfectious salmonellae were among the most virulent of this species; restricted to certain serotypes; and more capable of killing vaccinated animals. Such strains exhibited rapid (and rapidly reversible) switching to a less-virulent state accompanied by more competitive growth ex vivo that may contribute to maintenance in nature. The hypervirulent phenotype was associated with increased microbial pathogenicity (colonization; cytotoxin production; cytocidal activity), coupled with an altered innate immune cytokine response within infected cells (IFN-β; IL-1β; IL-6; IL-10). Gene expression analysis revealed that hyperinfectious strains display altered transcription of genes within the PhoP/PhoQ, PhoR/PhoB and ArgR regulons, conferring changes in the expression of classical virulence functions (e.g., SPI-1; SPI-2 effectors) and those involved in cellular physiology/metabolism (nutrient/acid stress). As hyperinfectious strains pose a potential risk to human and animal health, efforts toward mitigation of these potential food-borne contaminants may avert negative public health impacts and industry-associated losses

Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps.

Pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints are essential for establishing the benefit-to-risk ratio for therapeutic interventions in children and neonates. This article discusses the selection of an appropriate measure of response, the PD endpoint, which is a critical methodological step in designing pediatric efficacy and safety studies. We provide an overview of existing guidance on the choice of PD endpoints in pediatric clinical research. We identified several considerations relevant to the selection and measurement of PD endpoints in pediatric clinical trials, including the use of biomarkers, modeling, compliance, scoring systems, and validated measurement tools. To be useful, PD endpoints in children need to be clinically relevant, responsive to both treatment and/or disease progression, reproducible, and reliable. In most pediatric disease areas, this requires significant validation efforts. We propose a minimal set of criteria for useful PD endpoint selection and measurement. We conclude that, given the current heterogeneity of pediatric PD endpoint definitions and measurements, both across and within defined disease areas, there is an acute need for internationally agreed, validated, and condition-specific pediatric PD endpoints that consider the needs of all stakeholders, including healthcare providers, policy makers, patients, and families.Pediatric Research advance online publication, 11 April 2018; doi:10.1038/pr.2018.38

Benefit and risk evaluation of biased mu-receptor agonist oliceridine versus morphine

Background: To improve understanding of the respiratory behavior of oliceridine, a mu-opioid receptor agonist that selectively engages the G-protein-coupled signaling pathway with reduced activation of the beta-arrestin pathway, the authors compared its utility function with that of morphine. It was hypothesized that at equianalgesia, oliceridine will produce less respiratory depression than morphine and that this is reflected in a superior utility.Methods: Data from a previous trial that compared the respiratory and analgesic effects of oliceridine and morphine in healthy male volunteers ( n = 30) were reanalyzed. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed and served as basis for construction of utility functions, which are objective functions of probability of analgesia, P(analgesia), and probability of respiratory depression, P(respiratory depression). The utility function = P(analgesia >= 0.5) - P(respiratory depression >= 0.25), where analgesia >= 0.5 is the increase in hand withdrawal latency in the cold pressor test by at least 50%, and respiratory depression >= 0.25 is the decrease of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by at least 25%. Values are median +/- standard error of the estimate.Results: The two drugs were equianalgesic with similar potency values (oliceridine: 27.9 +/- 4.9 ng/ml; morphine 34.3 +/- 9.7 ng/ml; potency ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.56). A 50% reduction of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by morphine occurred at an effect-site concentration of 33.7 +/- 4.8 ng/ml, while a 25% reduction by oliceridine occurred at 27.4 +/- 3.5 ng/ml (potency ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.72; P < 0.01). Over the clinically relevant concentration range of 0 to 35 ng/ml, the oliceridine utility function was positive, indicating that the probability of analgesia exceeds the probability of respiratory depression. In contrast, the morphine function was negative, indicative of a greater probability of respiratory depression than analgesia.Conclusions: These data indicate a favorable oliceridine safety profile over morphine when considering analgesia and respiratory depression over the clinical concentration range