The role of branch architecture in assimilate production and partitioning: the example of apple (Malus domestica).

Article de revue (Article scientifique dans une revue à comité de lecture)International audienceUnderstanding the role of branch architecture in carbon production and allocation is essential to gain more insight into the complex process of assimilate partitioning in fruit trees. This mini review reports on the current knowledge of the role of branch architecture in carbohydrate production and partitioning in apple. The first-order carrier branch of apple illustrates the complexity of branch structure emerging from bud activity events and encountered in many fruit trees. Branch architecture influences carbon production by determining leaf exposure to light and by affecting leaf internal characteristics related to leaf photosynthetic capacity. The dynamics of assimilate partitioning between branch organs depends on the stage of development of sources and sinks. The sink strength of various branch organs and their relative positioning on the branch also affect partitioning. Vascular connections between branch organs determine major pathways for branch assimilate transport. We propose directions for employing a modeling approach to further elucidate the role of branch architecture on assimilate partitioning.</p

Supplemental LED lighting affects the dynamics of tomato fruit growth and composition

Understanding how greenhouse crops respond to supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) compared with traditional lighting systems is essential to utilize the full potential of LEDs and their further adoption in energy efficient greenhouses. This study quantified the effects of supplemental lighting with high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps and LED light on the dynamics of fruit growth and composition in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Two tomato genotypes (‘Foundation’ and ‘Progression’) were grown under daylight supplemented either with HPS (125 μmol m−2 s−1) combined with red/blue LED lighting (106 μmol m−2 s−1, HPS + LED light treatment) or red/blue LED light only (106 + 110 μmol m−2 s−1, LED + LED light treatment); and two genotypes (‘Foundation’ and ‘NUN09204’) under daylight supplemented either with red/blue LED light (200 μmol m−2 s−1, red/blue LED light treatment) or red/blue LED + far-red LED light (200 μmol m−2 s−1 + 40 μmol m−2 s−1, red/blue + far-red LED light treatment). Fresh weight and composition in glucose, fructose, sucrose, starch, citric acid and malic acid of tomato fruits at different stages of development were measured and analyzed in terms of three main underlying components: water dilution, dilution by soluble and storage compounds and metabolism. Growing fruits under the LED + LED compared to the HPS + LED light treatments increased average fruit fresh weight in all genotypes. The red/blue + far-red LED light treatment increased the production of soluble sugar, increased the dilution by soluble and storage compounds, and reduced water dilution leading to a strong increase in glucose, fructose and sucrose concentration in the pericarp. The LED + LED light treatment did not affect the metabolism of fruit biochemical compounds compared to the HPS + LED light treatments, but caused small changes in water dilution, which were reflected in the concentration of biochemical compounds. Dilution and metabolism were involved in genotypic differences in fruit composition. Our results show that altering the spectral composition of the supplemental light in energy efficient greenhouses can be done without an effect on fruit quality or even with an improvement of tomato fruit quality. Possible physiological processes underlying these light-induced changes in fruit biochemical compounds during fruit development in different genotypes were discussed.</p