New methods to detect circulating tumor DNA : application to patients' follow-up

L’ADN tumoral circulant (ADNtc) porte des altérations spécifiques de la tumeur des patients, qui sont détectables par un acte minimalement invasif. L’ADNtc représente donc un biomarqueur d’intérêt pour le suivi de l’évolution du cancer. Sa détection requière une technique hautement sensible et quantitative. Dans ce contexte, ce travail de thèse a porté sur la quantification et le suivi de l’ADNtc par PCR digitale en gouttelettes (PCRdg). Cet outil permet la détection d’altérations à l’échelle d’un ADN unique, offrant ainsi une sensibilité allant jusqu’à 0.001%. La détection de cet ADNtc a été réalisée par l’évaluation des biomarqueurs tels qu’une mutation spécifique de la tumeur, la fragmentation de l’ADNtc et l’hyperméthylation de séquences cibles. D’une part, nous avons observé que chez les patients atteints de cancer, l’ADN muté circulant est plus fragmenté que l’ADN non muté, et que cet ADN circulant de patients est globalement plus fragmenté que chez les sujets sains. D’autre part, une corrélation entre les pourcentages d’ADN muté et d’ADN hyperméthylé circulants a été observée au cours du suivi de patients. Ceci suggère la possibilité d’un suivi précis et quantitatif de l’ADNtc par l’évaluation de l’hyperméthylation en alternative à la détermination du statut mutationnel. Nous avons ensuite appliqué nos tests de détection de l’ADNtc dans le cadre de deux études cliniques. L’étude PLACOL, incluant 82 patients atteints de cancer colorectal métastatique, a permis de mettre en évidence deux facteurs pronostiques : un seuil de 0.1 ng/mL et la mesure de la pente de décroissance de la concentration en ADN muté ou hyperméthylé circulant. Dans la seconde étude, portant sur le mélanome métastatique dans le contexte d’une thérapie ciblée (vémurafenib), une corrélation inverse entre les concentrations d’ADNtc et de vémurafenib a été observée. Ces résultats suggèrent le potentiel clinique de l’ADNtc pour l’orientation thérapeutique des patients atteints de cancer avancé.Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) carries tumor-specific alterations that are detectable by minimally invasive sampling. It represents a highly pertinent marker for cancer monitoring during patients’ follow-up. CtDNA detection requires a highly sensitive and quantitative technique. In this context, this project focused on ctDNA quantification and monitoring by picoliter-droplet digital PCR. Thanks to the compartmentalization in millions of picoliter droplets, this tool allowed the detection of single DNA molecule with a sensitivity reaching 0.001%. Testing of ctDNA was performed through the evaluation of different potential biomarkers: specific mutations, ctDNA fragmentation, and hypermethylation of target sequences. On one hand, we observed in cancer patients that ctDNA is more fragmented than wild-type DNA, and, globally more fragmented than circulating DNA in healthy individuals. On the other hand, a strong correlation between percentages of hypermethylated and mutated DNA was observed during the follow-up of patients. Such results suggest the feasibility to precisely and quantitatively monitor ctDNA by the evaluation of hypermethylation as an alternative to the determination of mutational status. We have applied such ctDNA detection strategies in the context of two clinical studies. The PLACOL study, enrolling 82 metastatic colorectal cancer patients, allowed to highlight two prognostic factors: a ctDNA concentration threshold of 0.1 ng / mL, and the evaluation of ctDNA decreasing slope. In the second study, ctDNA was monitored in 11 melanoma patients in the context of a targeted therapy (vemurafenib). An inverse correlation between the concentrations of vemurafenib and ctDNA was demonstrated. These results suggest the clinical relevancy of ctDNA in advanced cancer patients, for the optimization of therapeutic management

Nouvelles méthodes de détection de l'ADN tumoral circulant par PCR digitale en gouttelettes : application au suivi des patients

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) carries tumor-specific alterations that are detectable by minimally invasive sampling. It represents a highly pertinent marker for cancer monitoring during patients’ follow-up. CtDNA detection requires a highly sensitive and quantitative technique. In this context, this project focused on ctDNA quantification and monitoring by picoliter-droplet digital PCR. Thanks to the compartmentalization in millions of picoliter droplets, this tool allowed the detection of single DNA molecule with a sensitivity reaching 0.001%. Testing of ctDNA was performed through the evaluation of different potential biomarkers: specific mutations, ctDNA fragmentation, and hypermethylation of target sequences. On one hand, we observed in cancer patients that ctDNA is more fragmented than wild-type DNA, and, globally more fragmented than circulating DNA in healthy individuals. On the other hand, a strong correlation between percentages of hypermethylated and mutated DNA was observed during the follow-up of patients. Such results suggest the feasibility to precisely and quantitatively monitor ctDNA by the evaluation of hypermethylation as an alternative to the determination of mutational status. We have applied such ctDNA detection strategies in the context of two clinical studies. The PLACOL study, enrolling 82 metastatic colorectal cancer patients, allowed to highlight two prognostic factors: a ctDNA concentration threshold of 0.1 ng / mL, and the evaluation of ctDNA decreasing slope. In the second study, ctDNA was monitored in 11 melanoma patients in the context of a targeted therapy (vemurafenib). An inverse correlation between the concentrations of vemurafenib and ctDNA was demonstrated. These results suggest the clinical relevancy of ctDNA in advanced cancer patients, for the optimization of therapeutic management.L’ADN tumoral circulant (ADNtc) porte des altérations spécifiques de la tumeur des patients, qui sont détectables par un acte minimalement invasif. L’ADNtc représente donc un biomarqueur d’intérêt pour le suivi de l’évolution du cancer. Sa détection requière une technique hautement sensible et quantitative. Dans ce contexte, ce travail de thèse a porté sur la quantification et le suivi de l’ADNtc par PCR digitale en gouttelettes (PCRdg). Cet outil permet la détection d’altérations à l’échelle d’un ADN unique, offrant ainsi une sensibilité allant jusqu’à 0.001%. La détection de cet ADNtc a été réalisée par l’évaluation des biomarqueurs tels qu’une mutation spécifique de la tumeur, la fragmentation de l’ADNtc et l’hyperméthylation de séquences cibles. D’une part, nous avons observé que chez les patients atteints de cancer, l’ADN muté circulant est plus fragmenté que l’ADN non muté, et que cet ADN circulant de patients est globalement plus fragmenté que chez les sujets sains. D’autre part, une corrélation entre les pourcentages d’ADN muté et d’ADN hyperméthylé circulants a été observée au cours du suivi de patients. Ceci suggère la possibilité d’un suivi précis et quantitatif de l’ADNtc par l’évaluation de l’hyperméthylation en alternative à la détermination du statut mutationnel. Nous avons ensuite appliqué nos tests de détection de l’ADNtc dans le cadre de deux études cliniques. L’étude PLACOL, incluant 82 patients atteints de cancer colorectal métastatique, a permis de mettre en évidence deux facteurs pronostiques : un seuil de 0.1 ng/mL et la mesure de la pente de décroissance de la concentration en ADN muté ou hyperméthylé circulant. Dans la seconde étude, portant sur le mélanome métastatique dans le contexte d’une thérapie ciblée (vémurafenib), une corrélation inverse entre les concentrations d’ADNtc et de vémurafenib a été observée. Ces résultats suggèrent le potentiel clinique de l’ADNtc pour l’orientation thérapeutique des patients atteints de cancer avancé

Digital PCR compartmentalization I. Single-molecule detection of rare mutations.

Polymerase chain reaction based techniques have been widely used in laboratory settings. Several applications in oncology, virology or prenatal diagnosis require highly sensitive detection methods, which cannot be achieved with conventional techniques. Digital PCR (dPCR) was developed from the association of PCR and limiting dilution procedures. It is based on the compartmentalization of DNA molecules in small volumes. Controlling the size and the content of each compartment is crucial to obtain a high sensitivity with a single molecule resolution. Microfluidics offers promising tools to isolate DNA fragments such as microdroplets, microchambers or microwells with volumes ranging from few picoliters to nanoliters. The review provides an overview of recent developments of microfluidics dPCR platforms and how this technology can influence the management of cancer patients

Multiplex Detection of Rare Mutations by Picoliter Droplet Based Digital PCR: Sensitivity and Specificity Considerations.

In cancer research, the accuracy of the technology used for biomarkers detection is remarkably important. In this context, digital PCR represents a highly sensitive and reproducible method that could serve as an appropriate tool for tumor mutational status analysis. In particular, droplet-based digital PCR approaches have been developed for detection of tumor-specific mutated alleles within plasmatic circulating DNA. Such an approach calls for the development and validation of a very significant quantity of assays, which can be extremely costly and time consuming. Herein, we evaluated assays for the detection and quantification of various mutations occurring in three genes often misregulated in cancers: the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and the Tumoral Protein p53 (TP53) genes. In particular, commercial competitive allele-specific TaqMan® PCR (castPCR™) technology, as well as TaqMan® and ZEN™ assays, have been evaluated for EGFR p.L858R, p.T790M, p.L861Q point mutations and in-frame deletions Del19. Specificity and sensitivity have been determined on cell lines DNA, plasmatic circulating DNA of lung cancer patients or Horizon Diagnostics Reference Standards. To show the multiplexing capabilities of this technology, several multiplex panels for EGFR (several three- and four-plexes) have been developed, offering new "ready-to-use" tests for lung cancer patients

Circulating Tumor DNA Measurement by Picoliter Droplet-Based Digital PCR and Vemurafenib Plasma Concentrations in Patients with Advanced BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

International audienceBACKGROUND:Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported as a prognostic marker in melanoma. In BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, a plasma under-exposure to vemurafenib could favor emerging resistance but no biological data are available to support this hypothesis.OBJECTIVE:We aimed to investigate the relationship between vemurafenib plasma concentrations and the ctDNA plasma concentration during follow-up of BRAF-mutated melanoma patients.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Eleven patients treated with single-agent vemurafenib for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma were analyzed in an exploratory monocentric study. The vemurafenib plasma concentration was measured by liquid chromatography. ctDNA was extracted from plasma samples and the ctDNA concentration was evaluated using picoliter droplet-based digital PCR with Taqman® detection probes targeting the BRAF p.V600E/K mutation and wild-type BRAF sequences.RESULTS:At baseline, plasma ctDNA was detectable in 72% (n = 8/11) of patients and the ctDNA concentration decreased in 88% of these patients (n = 7/8) from day (D) 0 to D15 after vemurafenib initiation. During follow-up, an increased ctDNA concentration was detected in nine patients: in five patients, the first increase in ctDNA concentrations followed a decrease in vemurafenib concentrations. More interestingly, an inverse correlation between vemurafenib concentration and ctDNA concentrations was demonstrated (p = 0.026). The ctDNA concentration at baseline was associated with overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.61, 95% CI 1.04-6.56; p = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the relevance of vemurafenib plasma monitoring during the follow-up of metastatic melanoma patients. Plasma drug monitoring and ctDNA concentrations could be combined to monitor tumor evolution in melanoma patients treated with anti-BRAF therapies

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY Volume: 30 Supplement: 5 Pages: 236-236 Meeting Abstract: 623P Published: OCT 2019

International audienc

Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Is a Prognostic Marker

International audiencePurpose: Despite recent therapeutic advances, prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor. Analyses from tumor tissues present limitations; identification of informative marker from blood might be a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Experimental Design: From 2011 to 2015, blood samples were prospectively collected from all consecutive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated in our center. Identification of ctDNA was done with next-generation sequencing targeted on referenced mutations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and with picoliter droplet digital PCR.Results: A total of 135 patients with resectable (n = 31; 23%), locally advanced (n = 36; 27%), or metastatic (n = 68; 50%) pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included. In patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 104), 48% (n = 50) had ctDNA detectable with a median mutation allelic frequency (MAF) of 6.1%. The presence of ctDNA was strongly correlated with poor overall survival (OS; 6.5 vs. 19.0 months; P < 0.001) in univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.007). To evaluate the impact of ctDNA level, patients were grouped according to MAF tertiles: OS were 18.9, 7.8, and 4.9 months (P < 0.001). Among patients who had curative intent resection (n = 31), 6 had ctDNA detectable after surgery, with an MAF of 4.4%. The presence of ctDNA was associated with a shorter disease-free survival (4.6 vs.17.6 months; P = 0.03) and shorter OS (19.3 vs. 32.2 months; P = 0.027).Conclusions: ctDNA is an independent prognostic marker in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, it arises as an indicator of shorter disease-free survival in resected patients when detected after surger

Plasma clearance of RAS mutation under therapeutic pressure is a rare event in metastatic colorectal cancer: Plasma clearance of RAS mutation in colorectal cancer

International audienceIn metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can be used to genotype tumors and track clonal evolution. We investigated the clearance of RAS mutated clones under chemotherapy pressure by ctDNA analysis in patients with a RAS mutated mCRC. Patients with a RAS mutated tumor included in the prospective PLACOL study, were monitored for ctDNA. Analyzes were based on optimized targeted next generation sequencing and/or droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR). For plasma samples without detectable mutations at progression disease, we tested the methylation status of WIF1 and NPY genes using methylation-ddPCR (met-ddPCR) to validate the presence of ctDNA. Among the 36 patients with positive plasma samples for RAS mutations at inclusion, 28 (77.8%) remained RAS positive at disease progression, and 8 (22.2%) became negative. Subsequent met-ddPCR for methylated markers showed that only 2 out of the 8 patients with RAS negative plasma had detectable ctDNA at progression. Therefore, only two samples among 36 were confirmed for clearance of RAS mutation in our series. In conclusion, this study suggests that the clearance of RAS mutations in patients treated by chemotherapy for a RAS mutated mCRC is a rare event. Monitoring tumor mutations in plasma samples should be combined with a strict control of the presence of ctDNA. The therapeutic impacts of RAS clearance need to be further explored. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Early Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as Marker of Therapeutic Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (PLACOL Study)

International audiencePurpose: Markers of chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are essential for optimization of treatment strategies. We evaluated the applicability of early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of therapeutic efficacy.Experimental Design: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with mCRC receiving a first- or second-line chemotherapy. CtDNA was assessed in plasma collected before the first (C0), second (C1) and/or third (C2) chemotherapy cycle, using picodroplet-digital PCR assays based either on detection of gene mutation (KRAS, BRAF, TP53) or hypermethylation (WIF1, NPY). CT scans were centrally assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Multivariate analyses were adjusted on age, gender, ECOG performance status (PS), metastatic synchronicity, and treatment line.Results: Eighty-two patients with mCRC treated in first- (82.9%) or second- (17.1%) line chemotherapy were included. Patients with a high (>10 ng/mL) versus low (≤0.1 ng/mL) ctDNA concentration at C0 had a shorter overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs. 33.4 months: adjusted HR, 5.64; 95% CI, 2.5-12.6; P < 0.0001). By analyzing the evolution of the ctDNA concentration between C0 and C2 or C1 (C2or1), we classified the patients in two groups (named "good" or "bad ctDNA responders"). In multivariate analysis, patients belonging to the group called "good ctDNA responder" (n = 58) versus "bad ctDNA responder" (n = 15) had a better objective response rate (P < 0.001), and a longer median progression-free survival (8.5 vs. 2.4 months: HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.40; P < 0.0001) and OS (27.1 vs. 11.2 months: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57; P < 0.001).Conclusions: This study suggests that early change in ctDNA concentration is a marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with mCRC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5416-25. ©2017 AACR

EGFR Del19 screening on lung cancer patients plasma using two-plex assay.

<p>These four plots were obtained from dPCR analysis on DNA extracted from plasma of lung cancer patients. The use of Del19 castPCR™ probe permitted to screen samples containing different deletions on exon 19 (of three, four, five and six amino acids, in panel A, B, C, D, respectively). In the table, event counts from the single experiments are listed. Input ng represents the amount of DNA used in dPCR, previously estimated by Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (three μL were used for each sample). Measured allelic frequencies are given for dPCR and NGS analysis. <i>Reference</i>, <i>wild-type + mutant DNA; NA</i>, <i>not analyzed; A</i>.<i>U</i>, <i>arbitrary units; AA</i>, <i>aminoacids</i>.</p