18 research outputs found

    IMPLICACIONES PARA EL ESTUDIO DE LA NEUROBIOLOGÍA DE LA EXPERIENCIA CONSCIENTE. EL ACTO IMPULSIVO

    Get PDF
    Conciencia e impulsividad son dos constructos multidimensionales relacionados con el control del pensamiento y comportamiento humano. Impulsividad es un rasgo de personalidad complejo caracterizado por una elevada tendencia a actuar sin pensar, incapacidad para planear actividades futuras y disminución de la capacidad de concentración. Conciencia por su parte, es un constructo que cobija una serie de procesos fisiológicos relacionados con la generación de experiencia conciente y la adquisición de conocimientos. Con respecto al control sobre la acción humana, conciencia e impulsividad parece estar relacionados con comportamientos opuestos. Históricamente, los esfuerzos realizados por diversas disciplinas con el fin de estudiar estos constructos han llevado al desarrollo de definiciones divergentes y a una serie de medidas, causando una mayor confusión. Los propósitos de este artículo son: 1) describir ejemplos de posibles soluciones al estado de confusión en el campo de la investigación sobre impulsividad y discutir como el estudio de la conciencia puede beneficiarse de la investigación de la impulsividad; 2) discutir algunas de las maneras utilizadas para medir impulsividad en el laboratorio y cómo hacer de estos constructos variables experimentales; 3) resumir algunas de las lecciones derivadas de la comparación de los actos impulsivos con los premeditados desde una perspectiva integral y multidimensional; 4) discutir las implicaciones derivadas del uso de un enfoque multidimensional para el estudio de la conciencia

    Protocol for developing a core outcome set for male infertility research:an international consensus development study

    Get PDF
    Abstract STUDY QUESTION We aim to develop, disseminate and implement a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future male infertility research. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Research into male infertility can be challenging to design, conduct and report. Evidence from randomized trials can be difficult to interpret and of limited ability to inform clinical practice for numerous reasons. These may include complex issues, such as variation in outcome measures and outcome reporting bias, as well as failure to consider the perspectives of men and their partners with lived experience of fertility problems. Previously, the Core Outcome Measure for Infertility Trials (COMMIT) initiative, an international consortium of researchers, healthcare professionals and people with fertility problems, has developed a core outcome set for general infertility research. Now, a bespoke core outcome set for male infertility is required to address the unique challenges pertinent to male infertility research. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, allied healthcare professionals, scientists, researchers and people with fertility problems, will be invited to participate. Formal consensus science methods will be used, including the modified Delphi method, modified Nominal Group Technique and the National Institutes of Health’s consensus development conference. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS An international steering group, including the relevant stakeholders outlined above, has been established to guide the development of this core outcome set. Possible core outcomes will be identified by undertaking a systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male factor infertility. These outcomes will be entered into a modified Delphi method. Repeated reflection and re-scoring should promote convergence towards consensus outcomes, which will be prioritized during a consensus development meeting to identify a final core outcome set. We will establish standardized definitions and recommend high-quality measurement instruments for individual core outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work has been supported by the Urology Foundation small project award, 2021. C.L.R.B. is the recipient of a BMGF grant and received consultancy fees from Exscentia and Exceed sperm testing, paid to the University of Dundee and speaking fees or honoraria paid personally by Ferring, Copper Surgical and RBMO. S.B. received royalties from Cambridge University Press, Speaker honoraria for Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society of Singapore, Merk SMART Masterclass and Merk FERRING Forum, paid to the University of Aberdeen. Payment for leadership roles within NHS Grampian, previously paid to self, now paid to University of Aberdeen. An Honorarium is received as Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open. M.L.E. is an advisor to the companies Hannah and Ro. B.W.M. received an investigator grant from the NHMRC, No: GNT1176437 is a paid consultant for ObsEva and has received research funding from Ferring and Merck. R.R.H. received royalties from Elsevier for a book, consultancy fees from Glyciome, and presentation fees from GryNumber Health and Aytu Bioscience. Aytu Bioscience also funded MiOXYS systems and sensors. Attendance at Fertility 2020 and Roadshow South Africa by Ralf Henkel was funded by LogixX Pharma Ltd. R.R.H. is also Editor in Chief of Andrologia and has been an employee of LogixX Pharma Ltd. since 2020. M.S.K. is an associate editor with Human Reproduction Open. K.Mc.E. received an honoraria for lectures from Bayer and Pharmasure in 2019 and payment for an ESHRE grant review in 2019. His attendance at ESHRE 2019 and AUA 2019 was sponsored by Pharmasure and Bayer, respectively. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative registration No: 1586. Available at www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1586. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE N/A. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT N/A

    Implicaciones para el estudio de la neurobiología de la experiencia consciente: el acto impulsivo

    No full text
    Conciencia e impulsividad son dos constructos multidimensionales relacionados con el control del pensamiento y comportamiento humano. Impulsividad es un rasgo de personalidad complejo caracterizado por una elevada tendencia a actuar sin pensar, incapacidad para planear actividades futuras y disminución de la capacidad de concentración. Conciencia por su parte, es un constructo que cobija una serie de procesos fisiológicos relacionados con la generación de experiencia consciente y la adquisición de conocimientos. Con respecto al control sobre la acción humana, conciencia e impulsividad parece estar relacionados con comportamientos opuestos. Históricamente, los esfuerzos realizados por diversas disciplinas con el fin de estudiar estos constructos han llevado al desarrollo de definiciones divergentes y a una serie de medidas, causando una mayor confusión. Los propósitos de este artículo son: 1) describir ejemplos de posibles soluciones al estado de confusión en el campo de la investigación sobre impulsividad y discutir como el estudio de la conciencia puede beneficiarse de la investigación de la impulsividad; 2) discutir algunas de las maneras utilizadas para medir impulsividad en el laboratorio y cómo hacer de estos constructos variables experimentales; 3) resumir algunas de las lecciones derivadas de la comparación de los actos impulsivos con los premeditados desde una perspectiva integral y multidimensional; 4) discutir las implicaciones derivadas del uso de un enfoque multidimensional para el estudio de la conciencia

    Examining the relation between visual imagery and spatial ability tests

    Get PDF
    Research evidence indicates that self-report imagery ability is psychometrically distinct from objective, spatial test measures. One hypothesis put forward in the literature to explain this finding is that the nature of the stimulus is important. The aim of this paper was to examine the relationship between spatial abilities and measures of visual imagery obtained using different types of stimulus material. The main finding was that imagery tasks that required the mental synthesis and/or transformation of visual forms such as alphanumeric characters and simple geometric shapes correlated strongly with tests of spatial ability. In contrast, images of familiar items retrieved from long-term memory did not correlate with spatial test performance. It is argued that tasks that better control the stimuli imagined and the standards used to rate the quality of the image provide more objective measures of imagery ability. The implications of these findings are discussed

    Impulsivity, intelligence and P300 wave: An empirical study

    No full text
    The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships among impulsivity, intelligence and P300, a well-known component of the event-related potential widely studied in personality and intelligence research. Eighty-two males completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale and the two-subtest form of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. A subsample of 45 participants (mean age=24.4, SD=4.6) performed a visual oddball task, consisting of a two-letter recognition task, during which psychophysiological data were recorded. Although no significant relationships emerged for P300 latency, overall results suggest that the P300 amplitude was positively related to IQ and negatively related to impulsivity. Those who scored high on impulsivity (high impulsives) had lower P300 amplitudes than low impulsives, but this relationship was not significant when controlling for individual differences in mental ability. The results also showed an inverse relationship between mental ability and impulsivity. That is, high impulsives demonstrated reduced cognitive performance on intelligence testing and it is reflected in their reduced P300 amplitude. These findings are likely due to high impulsives' less efficient ability to inhibit task-irrelevant information OF to ignore additional information intake. It was suggested that impulsivity exerts a disadvantageous influence on the performance of tasks (such as those used on intelligence tests) in which exclusive concentration and sustained attention are necessary. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

    Individual Differences in Visual Event-Related Potentials: P300 Cognitive Augmenting/Reducing Parallels N100 Sensory Augmenting/Reducing

    No full text
    In a visual event-related potential experiment, both N100 aumenting/reducing data and oddball paradigm P300 data were collected from the same subjects. A significant correlation was obtained between augmenting/reducing and the degree to which stimulus probability affected P300 amplitude. Subjects who augment/reduce in response to increased stimulus brightness in the sensory domain also appear to augment/reduce in response to low probability in the cognitive domain

    No Decrement in Visual P300 Amplitude During Extended Performance of the Oddball Task

    No full text
    Research indicates that in visual sustained attention paradigms, the amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential invoked by target (critical) stimuli shows a decrement in amplitude. This amplitude decrement parallels decrements in vigilance performance that result from the difficult discrimination that is typically required between the infrequent targets and the frequent nontargets (neutral stimuli). In contrast, target stimulus P300 does not appear to show a decrement across large numbers of trials during performance of the “oddball” paradigm, in which targets and nontargets are highly discriminable. The present study measured target and nontarget P300 amplitude during performance of a visual oddball paradigm extended over an interval of some 3 1/2 hours, a period well in excess of the 3/4 hour intervals employed in previous research. The results indicated no decrement in P300 amplitude as a function of time for either targets or nontargets. The only significant relationship between P300 and behavioral data was an inverse correlation across oddball runs between average nontarget P300 amplitude and total number of targets missed
    corecore