The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review

Background: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact.However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement inpractice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied healthprofessionals practice.Methods: A systematic review protocol was developed comprising: a defined search strategy for PsycINFO,MEDLINE and CINHAL databases and inclusion criteria and systematic procedures for data extraction and qualityappraisal. Studies were included if they were published in English and investigated facilitators and/or barriers toroutine outcome measurement by allied health professionals. No restrictions were placed on publication type,design, country, or year of publication. Reference lists of included publications were searched to identify additionalpapers. Descriptive methods were used to synthesise the findings.Results: 960 papers were retrieved; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Professional groups represented werePhysiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy. The included literature varied in qualityand design. Facilitators and barriers to routine outcome measurement exist at individual, managerial andorganisational levels. Key factors affecting professionals’ use of routine outcome measurement include: professionals’level of knowledge and confidence about using outcome measures, and the degree of organisational and peersupportprofessionals received with a view to promoting their work in practice.Conclusions: Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is wellrecognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians’ ability and desire toundertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routineoutcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, andorganisational levels of an organisation

Investigating the purpose of an online discussion group for health professionals: a case example from forensic occupational therapy

Background: Thousands of health-related online discussion groups are active world-wide however, very little is known about the purpose and usefulness of such groups. In 2003 an online discussion group called ‘forensic occupational therapy' was established in the United Kingdom. This group was examined to gain an understanding of the purpose and use of online discussion groups for health professionals who may be practically and geographically isolated from others in similar areas of practice. Methods: Following a case study design, descriptive characteristics on members' locations and number of posts were collected from the forensic occupational therapy online discussion group. Eight years of posts (2003-2011) were examined using a theoretical thematic analysis process to identify and describe the purposes for which members were using the group. Results: Members from 20 countries contributed to the discussion group; the vast majority of posts being from members in the United Kingdom. Activity within the group was consistently high for the first five years however, activity within the group declined in the final three years. Six purposes for which members use the online discussion group were identified: seeking and giving advice, networking, requesting and sharing material resources, service development, defining the role of occupational therapists, and student learning. Conclusions: Findings suggest that health professionals in specialized and often isolated areas of practice are keen to connect with colleagues and learn from each other's experiences. The main purposes for which the online discussion group was used could be summarized as communication, information sharing and networking; though activity within the group declined significantly during the last three years of the data collection period. This raises questions about the sustainability of online discussion groups within the rapidly developing social media environment

Clinicians' caseload management behaviours as explanatory factors in patients' length of time on caseloads : a predictive multilevel study in paediatric community occupational therapy

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Using shared goal setting to improve access and equity : a mixed methods study of the Good Goals intervention in children's occupational therapy

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Multiple novel prostate cancer susceptibility signals identified by fine-mapping of known risk loci among Europeans

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous common prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility loci. We have fine-mapped 64 GWAS regions known at the conclusion of the iCOGS study using large-scale genotyping and imputation in 25 723 PrCa cases and 26 274 controls of European ancestry. We detected evidence for multiple independent signals at 16 regions, 12 of which contained additional newly identified significant associations. A single signal comprising a spectrum of correlated variation was observed at 39 regions; 35 of which are now described by a novel more significantly associated lead SNP, while the originally reported variant remained as the lead SNP only in 4 regions. We also confirmed two association signals in Europeans that had been previously reported only in East-Asian GWAS. Based on statistical evidence and linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure, we have curated and narrowed down the list of the most likely candidate causal variants for each region. Functional annotation using data from ENCODE filtered for PrCa cell lines and eQTL analysis demonstrated significant enrichment for overlap with bio-features within this set. By incorporating the novel risk variants identified here alongside the refined data for existing association signals, we estimate that these loci now explain ∼38.9% of the familial relative risk of PrCa, an 8.9% improvement over the previously reported GWAS tag SNPs. This suggests that a significant fraction of the heritability of PrCa may have been hidden during the discovery phase of GWAS, in particular due to the presence of multiple independent signals within the same regio

Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

Funder: NCI U24CA211006Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts