Replacing natural wetlands with stormwater management facilities: biophysical and perceived social values

Urban expansion replaces wetlands of natural origin with artificial stormwater management facilities. The literature suggests that efforts to mimic natural wetlands in the design of stormwater facilities can expand the provision of ecosystem services. Policy developments seek to capitalize on these improvements, encouraging developers to build stormwater wetlands in place of stormwater ponds; however, few have compared the biophysical values and social perceptions of these created wetlands to those of the natural wetlands they are replacing. We compared four types of wetlands: natural references sites, natural wetlands impacted by agriculture, created stormwater wetlands, and created stormwater ponds. We anticipated that they would exhibit a gradient in biodiversity, ecological integrity, chemical and hydrologic stress. We further anticipated that perceived values would mirror measured biophysical values. We found higher biophysical values associated with wetlands of natural origin (both reference and agriculturally impacted). The biophysical values of stormwater wetlands and stormwater ponds were lower and indistinguishable from one another. The perceived wetland values assessed by the public differed from the observed biophysical values. This has important policy implications, as the public are not likely to perceive the loss of values associated with the replacement of natural wetlands with created stormwater management facilities. We conclude that 1) agriculturally impacted wetlands provide biophysical values equivalent to those of natural wetlands, meaning that land use alone is not a great predictor of wetland value; 2) stormwater wetlands are not a substantive improvement over stormwater ponds, relative to wetlands of natural origin; 3) stormwater wetlands are poor mimics of natural wetlands, likely due to fundamental distinctions in terms of basin morphology, temporal variation in hydrology, ground water connectivity, and landscape position; 4) these drivers are relatively fixed, thus, once constructed, it may not be possible to modify them to improve provision of biophysical values; 5) these fixed drivers are not well perceived by the public and thus public perception may not capture the true value of natural wetlands, including those impacted by agriculture

Giant and complex aneurysms treatment with preservation of flow via bypass technique

Due to their anatomical characteristics and the complexity of the procedures required to obtain their complete occlusion, the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms is a real challenge. Direct reconstructive strategies, whether by interventional neuroradiology (coils, stents) or microsurgical (clipping) means, are not always applicable and, in patients that would not tolerate parent or collateral artery sacrifice, the adjunction of a revascularization procedure using a bypass technique might be necessary. Cerebral arterial bypasses can be classified according to their function (3 types: flow replacement, flow reversal or protective), the branching mode of the graft used (3 types: pedicled, interpositional or in situ), the sites of anastomosis (2 types: extracranial-intracranial or intracranial-intracranial) and the class of flow they are supposed to provide (3 types: low-, intermediate- or high-flow). In this article, the authors review the different aspects in the management of patients with a giant intracranial aneurysm using a bypass: preoperative work-up, types of bypass and indications, surgical techniques and results