The role of imaging in advancing the understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and staging of central chondroid bone tumours

Central chondroid bone tumours are one of the most common primary bone tumours. Benign central chondroid tumours are termed enchondromas and its malignant counterpart are called chondrosarcomas. Enchondromas are frequently observed on routine imaging. Similarly, chondrosarcomas are the second most common primary bone tumour after osteosarcoma. Imaging is crucial in the diagnosis of central chondroid tumours and in the differentiation of enchondromas from chondrosarcomas. Furthermore, imaging plays a vital role in the staging of chondrosarcomas. In this thesis, the published scientific literature on the role of imaging in the diagnosis of benign chondroid tumours and chondrosarcomas and the role of imaging in the staging of chondrosarcomas is reviewed and summarised. Furthermore, the contribution of the authors’ published work is highlighted in the thesis. The first two articles are review articles which discuss the clinical and imaging features of benign and malignant chondrogenic tumours and the significance of imaging in the diagnosis of these tumours. The third article is an original article which investigates the theory of the pathogenesis of enchondromas. It is widely believed that enchondromas arise from cartilage islands which are displaced from the growth plate during the process of skeletal maturation. However, this theory is unproven, and the origin of this theory was forgotten prior to the authors’ study. Based on the incidental prevalence of enchondromas of the knee in the adult population of 2.9%, the study assesses the prevalence of cartilage islands/enchondromas in skeletally immature patients. In this study, no cartilage islands/enchondromas in skeletally immature patients were identified. The study therefore shows the rarity of enchondromas in skeletally immature individuals which is in contrast to the adult population. Furthermore, in view of the absence of cartilage islands in this study, the study raises doubts about the validity of the unproven theory. Lastly, the very origin of this theory is rediscovered in this thesis which has been forgotten in modern medicine. The fourth article is an original article which evaluates the role of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumours. Prior to the authors’ study the role of DWI in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumours was uncertain. The authors’ study demonstrates that DWI cannot be used to differentiate between enchondromas and chondrosarcomas and that DWI does not aid in the distinction of low-grade chondroid tumours from high-grade chondrosarcomas. This is a finding which was not known prior to the study. The fifth article is an original article which assesses the utility of conventional MRI in the differentiation of low-grade from high-grade chondrosarcomas of long bone. Prior to the authors’ study the role of conventional MRI in the differentiation of low- grade from high-grade chondrosarcomas of long bone was unknown. The authors’ study shows that bone expansion, active periostitis, soft tissue mass and tumour length can be used to differentiate high-grade from low-grade chondral lesions of long bone on conventional MRI. Furthermore, the presence of these four MRI features shows a diagnostic accuracy of 95.6%. These findings were not known prior to the study and have significantly furthered the knowledge about the role of conventional MRI in the grading of chondrosarcoma of long bone. The sixth article is an original article which evaluates the role of bone scintigraphy and Computed Tomography of the chest in the staging of chondrosarcoma of bone. Whilst guidelines regarding the staging of bone sarcomas state that bone scintigraphy should be performed to assess for the presence of skeletal metastases and that Computed Tomography (CT) of the chest should be performed to evaluate for possible pulmonary metastases, there has been no research on the utility of bone scintigraphy in chondrosarcoma of bone and on the role of CT-chest in the staging of chondrosarcomas. Furthermore, the prevalence of skeletal and pulmonary metastases of chondrosarcoma at presentation was unknown prior to this study. The authors’ study demonstrated no skeletal metastases on bone scintigraphy in chondrosarcoma of bone at presentation. In contrast, pulmonary metastases were observed in approximately 5% of all patients with chondrosarcoma at presentation on CT-chest. The finding therefore demonstrates the rarity of skeletal metastases in chondrosarcoma of bone at presentation which is in contrast to osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The study therefore concludes that there is little role for skeletal scintigraphy in the surgical staging of chondrosarcoma. In contrast, the study shows that there is a role for CT-chest in the staging of chondrosarcoma. These above described findings are important new findings and represent a significant contribution to the knowledge base regarding metastatic behaviour of chondrosarcomas at presentation and regarding the staging of chondrosarcoma of bone. In summary, the authors’ publications have significantly enhanced and furthered the understanding of the pathogenesis of enchondromas, the role of functional MRI in the differentiation of enchondromas from chondrosarcomas, the utility of MRI in the grading of chondrosarcomas and the role of skeletal scintigraphy in the staging of chondrosarcomas

ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care : Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults and Bone Sarcoma. A critical review

Background: ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care (ERQCC) are checklists and explanations of organisation and actions that are necessary to give high-quality care to patients who have a specific tumour type. They are written by European experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care. ERQCC papers give oncology teams, patients, policymakers and managers an overview of the elements needed in any healthcare system to provide high quality of care throughout the patient journey. References are made to clinical guidelines and other resources where appropriate, and the focus is on care in Europe. Sarcoma: essential requirements for quality care Sarcomas - which can be classified into soft tissue and bone sarcomas - are rare, but all rare cancers make up more than 20% of cancers in Europe, and there are substantial inequalities in access to high-quality care. Sarcomas, of which there are many subtypes, comprise a particularly complex and demanding challenge for healthcare systems and providers. This paper presents essential requirements for quality cancer care of soft tissue sarcomas in adults and bone sarcomas. High-quality care must only be carried out in specialised sarcoma centres (including paediatric cancer centres) which have both a core multidisciplinary team and an extended team of allied professionals, and which are subject to quality and audit procedures. Access to such units is far from universal in all European countries. It is essential that, to meet European aspirations for high-quality comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations implement the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis and follow-up, to treatment, to improve survival and quality of life for patients. Conclusion: Taken together, the information presented in this paper provides a comprehensive description of the essential requirements for establishing a high-quality service for soft tissue sarcomas in adults and bone sarcomas. The ECCO expert group is aware that it is not possible to propose a 'one size fits all' system for all countries, but urges that access to multidisciplinary teams is guaranteed to all patients with sarcoma. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.Peer reviewe

Radiotherapy to the prostate for men with metastatic prostate cancer in the UK and Switzerland: Long-term results from the STAMPEDE randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: STAMPEDE has previously reported that radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate improved overall survival (OS) for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer with low metastatic burden, but not those with high-burden disease. In this final analysis, we report long-term findings on the primary outcome measure of OS and on the secondary outcome measures of symptomatic local events, RT toxicity events, and quality of life (QoL). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients were randomised at secondary care sites in the United Kingdom and Switzerland between January 2013 and September 2016, with 1:1 stratified allocation: 1,029 to standard of care (SOC) and 1,032 to SOC+RT. No masking of the treatment allocation was employed. A total of 1,939 had metastatic burden classifiable, with 42% low burden and 58% high burden, balanced by treatment allocation. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses used Cox regression and flexible parametric models (FPMs), adjusted for stratification factors age, nodal involvement, the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, regular aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and planned docetaxel use. QoL in the first 2 years on trial was assessed using prospectively collected patient responses to QLQ-30 questionnaire. Patients were followed for a median of 61.3 months. Prostate RT improved OS in patients with low, but not high, metastatic burden (respectively: 202 deaths in SOC versus 156 in SOC+RT, hazard ratio (HR) = 0·64, 95% CI 0.52, 0.79, p < 0.001; 375 SOC versus 386 SOC+RT, HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.96, 1.28, p = 0·164; interaction p < 0.001). No evidence of difference in time to symptomatic local events was found. There was no evidence of difference in Global QoL or QLQ-30 Summary Score. Long-term urinary toxicity of grade 3 or worse was reported for 10 SOC and 10 SOC+RT; long-term bowel toxicity of grade 3 or worse was reported for 15 and 11, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate RT improves OS, without detriment in QoL, in men with low-burden, newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer, indicating that it should be recommended as a SOC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00268476, ISRCTN.com ISRCTN78818544

Abiraterone in “high-” and “low-risk” metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in European Urology on 23/08/2019, available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283819306207?via%3Dihub The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.Background Abiraterone acetate received licencing for use in only “high-risk” metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) following the LATITUDE trial findings. However, a “risk”-related effect was not seen in the STAMPEDE trial. There remains uncertainty as to whether men with LATITUDE “low-risk” M1 disease benefit from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with abiraterone acetate and prednisolone (AAP). Objective Evaluation of heterogeneity of effect between LATITUDE high- and low-risk M1 prostate cancer patients receiving ADT + AAP in the STAMPEDE trial. Design, setting, and participants A post hoc subgroup analysis of the 2017 STAMPEDE “abiraterone comparison”. Staging scans for M1 patients contemporaneously randomised to ADT or ADT + AAP within the STAMPEDE trial were evaluated centrally and blind to treatment assignment. Stratification was by risk according to the criteria set out in the LATITUDE trial. Exploratory subgroup stratification incorporated the CHAARTED criteria. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome measure was failure-free survival (FFS). Further exploratory analysis evaluated clinical skeletal-related events, progression-free survival (PFS), and prostate cancer-specific death. Standard Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were employed for analysis. Results and limitations A total of 901 M1 STAMPEDE patients were evaluated after exclusions. Of the patients, 428 (48%) were identified as having a low risk and 473 (52%) a high risk. Patients receiving ADT + AAP had significantly improved OS (low-risk hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66, 95% confidence interval or CI [0.44–0.98]) and FFS (low-risk HR: 0.24, 95% CI [0.17–0.33]) compared with ADT alone. Heterogeneity of effect was not seen between low- and high-risk groups for OS or FFS. For OS benefit in low risk, the number needed to treat was four times greater than that for high risk. However, this was not observed for the other measured endpoints. Conclusions Men with mHNPC gain treatment benefit from ADT + AAP irrespective of risk stratification for “risk” or “volume”. Patient summary Coadministration of abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with prolonged overall survival and disease control, compared with ADT alone, in all men with metastatic disease starting hormone therapy for the first time.This study was supported by Cancer Research U.K., Medical Research Council, Astellas Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis.Published versio

Radiotherapy to the prostate for men with metastatic prostate cancer in the UK and Switzerland: Long-term results from the STAMPEDE randomised controlled trial

© 2022 The Authors. Published by PLoS. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003998Background STAMPEDE has previously reported that radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate improved overall survival (OS) for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer with low metastatic burden, but not those with high-burden disease. In this final analysis, we report long-term findings on the primary outcome measure of OS and on the secondary outcome measures of symptomatic local events, RT toxicity events, and quality of life (QoL). Methods and findings Patients were randomised at secondary care sites in the United Kingdom and Switzerland between January 2013 and September 2016, with 1:1 stratified allocation: 1,029 to standard of care (SOC) and 1,032 to SOC+RT. No masking of the treatment allocation was employed. A total of 1,939 had metastatic burden classifiable, with 42% low burden and 58% high burden, balanced by treatment allocation. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses used Cox regression and flexible parametric models (FPMs), adjusted for stratification factors age, nodal involvement, the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, regular aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and planned docetaxel use. QoL in the first 2 years on trial was assessed using prospectively collected patient responses to QLQ-30 questionnaire. Patients were followed for a median of 61.3 months. Prostate RT improved OS in patients with low, but not high, metastatic burden (respectively: 202 deaths in SOC versus 156 in SOC+RT, hazard ratio (HR) = 0·64, 95% CI 0.52, 0.79, p < 0.001; 375 SOC versus 386 SOC+RT, HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.96, 1.28, p = 0·164; interaction p < 0.001). No evidence of difference in time to symptomatic local events was found. There was no evidence of difference in Global QoL or QLQ-30 Summary Score. Long-term urinary toxicity of grade 3 or worse was reported for 10 SOC and 10 SOC+RT; long-term bowel toxicity of grade 3 or worse was reported for 15 and 11, respectively. Conclusions Prostate RT improves OS, without detriment in QoL, in men with low-burden, newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer, indicating that it should be recommended as a SOC.Research support for this comparison and other comparisons in the STAMPEDE protocol was awarded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK_A12459) www.cancerresearchuk.org (for this comparison, co-authors CCP, DPD, MDM, MKBP, MR, MRS, NDJ; and additionally for other comparisons DG, DM, GA, REL, RM, WC); Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_UU_12023/25, MC_UU_00004/01 and MC_UU_00004/02) www.ukri.org/councils/mrc (to authors MKBP, MRS, REL); and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, www.sakk.ch (to co-author SG). Other research support for the STAMPEDE protocol was awarded by Astellas www.astellas.com, Clovis Oncology www.clovisoncology.com, Janssen www.janssen.com, Novartis www.novartis.com, Pfizer www.pfizer.com, Sanofi-Aventis www.sanofi.com. CCP, DPD and NDJ are supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London.Published onlin

Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Based on previous findings, we hypothesised that radiotherapy to the prostate would improve overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer, and that the benefit would be greatest in patients with a low metastatic burden. We aimed to compare standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer, with and without radiotherapy.This article is freely available via Open Access

Myoepithelioma of bone with a novel FUS-POU5F1 fusion gene

AimsMyoepithelial tumours of soft tissue are rare lesions with a broad morphological and clinical spectrum. Previous studies have found EWSR1 rearrangements in approximately half of all cases and PBX1, ZNF44 and POU5F1 have been identified as recurrent fusion partners. In bone, only a small number of myoepithelial tumours have been described. We investigated an intraosseous myoepithelioma of the sacrum in a 54-year-old man without EWSR1 rearrangement for the presence of other fusion genes. Methods and resultsG-banding analysis, SNP-array and fluorescence in situ hybridisation suggested rearrangement of the FUS and POU5F1 genes. RT-PCR confirmed a chimeric in-frame transcript fusing FUS exon 5 to POU5F1 exon 2. The clinical course after en bloc resection was without recurrence or metastasis over a period of 87months. ConclusionWe report a novel FUS-POU5F1 fusion gene in an intraosseous myoepithelioma of the sacrum. This case highlights that FUS can replace EWSR1 as the N-terminal transactivator in oncogenic fusion genes in myoepithelial tumours, similar to that which has previously been demonstrated in other tumour entities. Thus, in addition to EWSR1, also FUS needs to be considered as a potential fusion partner in the molecular work up of myoepithelial tumours