8 research outputs found

    Erythrodermic Mycosis Fungoides: The Algorithm of Diagnosis and Treatment

    Get PDF
    Erythrodermic mycosis fungoides (eMF) is an atypical severe form of mycosis fungoides resulting from persistent and treatment-resistant disease. eMF manifests as generalized skin bluish lesions, intense itching, secondary lymphadenopathy, and significant deterioration of quality of life. A differential diagnostic algorithm for various forms of erythrodermia is suggested. The paper presents a clinical case of eMF with spots and plaques that skipped the tumor stage. Experience of eMF treatment using vorinostat, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, and alemtuzumab is described

    Loss of CD20 Expression in Follicular Lymphoma after Program Anti-Tumor Therapy Including Rituximab: Literature Data and Case Report

    Get PDF
    It is the first description of a case of follicular lymphoma with a loss of CD20 antigen expression during the anti-tumor treatment including rituximab in the NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center. The article discusses the tactics of further management of such patients and the effect of the CD20-negative status of follicular lymphoma tumor cells acquired during immunochemotherapy

    Modified carbon-containing electrodes in stripping voltammetry of metals. Part II. Composite and microelectrodes

    Full text link

    Enasidenib vs conventional care in older patients with late-stage mutant-IDH2 relapsed/refractory AML: a randomized phase 3 trial

    No full text
    This open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT02577406) compared enasidenib, an oral IDH2 inhibitor, with conventional care regimens (CCR) in patients aged ≥60 years with late-stage, mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to 2 or 3 prior AML-directed therapies. Patients were first preselected to a CCR (azacitidine, intermediate-dose cytarabine, low-dose cytarabine, or supportive care), and then randomized (1:1) to enasidenib 100 mg/day or CCR. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), hematologic improvement (HI), and transfusion independence (TI). Overall, 319 patients were randomized to enasidenib (n=158) or CCR (n=161). Median age was 71 years. Median (range) enasidenib exposure was 142 days (3-1270) and CCR was 36 days (1-1166). One enasidenib (0.6%) and 20 CCR (12%) patients received no randomized treatment, and 30% and 43%, respectively, received subsequent AML-directed therapies during follow-up. Median OS with enasidenib vs CCR was 6.5 vs 6.2 months (HR [hazard ratio] 0.86; P=.23); 1-year survival was 37.5% vs 26.1%. Enasidenib meaningfully improved EFS (median 4.9 months, vs 2.6 months with CCR; HR 0.68; P=.008), TTF (median 4.9 vs 1.9 months, HR 0.53; P<.001), ORR (40.5% vs 9.9%; P<.001), HI (42.4% vs 11.2%), and RBC-TI (31.7% vs 9.3%). Enasidenib safety was consistent with prior reports. The primary study endpoint was not met but OS was confounded by early dropout and subsequent AML-directed therapies. Enasidenib provided meaningful benefits in EFS, TTF, ORR, HI, and RBC-TI in this heavily pretreated older mutant-IDH2 R/R AML population

    Sea Ice Modelling

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Plasmodesmata: Channels for Viruses on the Move

    No full text
    The symplastic communication network established by plasmodesmata (PD) and connected phloem provides an essential pathway for spatiotemporal intercellular signaling in plant development but is also exploited by viruses for moving their genomes between cells in order to infect plants systemically. Virus movement depends on virus-encoded movement proteins (MPs) that target PD and therefore represent important keys to the cellular mechanisms underlying the intercellular trafficking of viruses and other macromolecules. Viruses and their MPs have evolved different mechanisms for intracellular transport and interaction with PD. Some viruses move from cell to cell by interacting with cellular mechanisms that control the size exclusion limit of PD whereas other viruses alter the PD architecture through assembly of specialized transport structures within the channel. Some viruses move between cells in the form of assembled virus particles whereas other viruses may interact with nucleic acid transport mechanisms to move their genomes in a non-encapsidated form. Moreover, whereas several viruses rely on the secretory pathway to target PD, other viruses interact with the cortical endoplasmic reticulum and associated cytoskeleton to spread infection. This chapter provides an introduction into viruses and their role in studying the diverse cellular mechanisms involved in intercellular PD-mediated macromolecular trafficking
    corecore