Evolution of reproductive development in the volvocine algae

The evolution of multicellularity, the separation of germline cells from sterile somatic cells, and the generation of a male–female dichotomy are certainly among the greatest innovations of eukaryotes. Remarkably, phylogenetic analysis suggests that the shift from simple to complex, differentiated multicellularity was not a unique progression in the evolution of life, but in fact a quite frequent event. The spheroidal green alga Volvox and its close relatives, the volvocine algae, span the full range of organizational complexity, from unicellular and colonial genera to multicellular genera with a full germ–soma division of labor and male–female dichotomy; thus, these algae are ideal model organisms for addressing fundamental issues related to the transition to multicellularity and for discovering universal rules that characterize this transition. Of all living species, Volvox carteri represents the simplest version of an immortal germline producing specialized somatic cells. This cellular specialization involved the emergence of mortality and the production of the first dead ancestors in the evolution of this lineage. Volvocine algae therefore exemplify the evolution of cellular cooperation from cellular autonomy. They also serve as a prime example of the evolution of complex traits by a few successive, small steps. Thus, we learn from volvocine algae that the evolutionary transition to complex, multicellular life is probably much easier to achieve than is commonly believed

Genetic engineering of the multicellular green alga Volvox: a modified and multiplied bacterial antibiotic resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker

Hallmann A, Rappel A. Genetic engineering of the multicellular green alga Volvox: a modified and multiplied bacterial antibiotic resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker. Plant J. 1999;17(1):99-109.The green alga Volvox represents the simplest multicellular organism: Volvox is composed of only two cell types, somatic and reproductive. Volvox, therefore, is an attractive model system for studying various aspects of multicellularity. With the biolistic nuclear transformation of Volvox carteri, the powerful molecular genetic manipulation of this organism has been established, but applications have been restricted to an auxotrophic mutant serving as the DNA recipient. Therefore, a dominant selectable marker working in all strains and mutants of this organism is required. Among several gene constructs tested, the most advantageous results were obtained with a chimeric gene composed of the coding sequence of the bacterial ble gene, conferring resistance to the antibiotic zeocin, modified with insertions of two endogenous introns from the Volvox arylsulfatase gene and fused to 5' and 3' untranslated regions from the Volvox beta 2-tubulin gene. In the most suitable plasmid used, the gene dosage was increased 16-fold by a technique that allows exponential multiplication of a DNA fragment. Co-transformation of this plasmid and a non-selectable plasmid allowed the identification of zeocin resistant transformants with nuclear integration of both selectable and non-selectable plasmids. Stable expression of the ble gene and of genes from several non-selectable plasmids is demonstrated. The modified ble gene provides the first dominant marker for transformation of both wild-type and mutant strains of Volvox

Allometry and stoichiometry of unicellular, colonial and multicellular phytoplankton

Phytoplankton life forms, including unicells, colonies, pseudocolonies, and multicellular organisms, span a huge size range. The smallest unicells are less than 1 µm3 (e.g. cyanobacteria), while large unicellular diatoms may attain 109 µm3, being visible to the naked eye. Phytoplankton includes chemo-organotrophic unicells, colonies and multicellular organisms that depend on symbionts or kleptoplastids for their capacity to photosynthesize. Analyses of physical (transport within cells, diffusion boundary layers, package effect, turgor, and vertical movements) and biotic (grazing, viruses and other parasitoids) factors indicate potential ecological constraints and opportunities that differ among the life forms. There are also variations among life forms in elemental stoichiometry and in allometric relations between biovolume and specific growth. While many of these factors probably have ecological and evolutionary significance, work is needed to establish those that are most important, warranting explicit description in models. Other factors setting limitations on growth rate (selecting slow-growing species) await elucidation