Very late relapse of ALL after 14 years: treatment with CAR-T cells

Not require

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents

Background. ALL is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo- HSCT) in children. Objective. The analysis of results of therapy in children and adolescents treated for ALL with allo-HSCT. Patients and methods. A total number of 41 patients undergoing allo-HSCT due to ALL between 2003 and 2012. In 17 patients HSCT was performed from related donor and in 24 from unrelated donor. A source of hematopoietic stem cells was peripheral blood in 21 patients, bone marrow in 18 patients and cord blood in 2 patients. Results. At present, 27 (65.8%) patients stay alive. Among 14 deaths, 8 were regarded as transplant-related mortality, and 6 as a relapse of disease. Transplant-related mortality was 8/41 (19.5%), including 7 (17%) in early posttransplant period (before day +100). Probability of survival for all patients was: pDFS=0.652±0.091 (mean disease-freesurvival was 3.8 years, 95%CI=2.7-4.8), pOS=0.630±0.080 (mean survival 3.9 years, 95%CI=3.0-4.8). The only factor predicting overall survival was time of pre-transplant relapse: for very early relapses pOS=0.333±0.157, for early relapses pOS=0.666±0.272 and for late relapses pOS=0.833±0.152 (p=0.010). Conclusions. Allo-HSCT from well-matched unrelated donors or genoidentical sibling donors is an effective treatment with acceptable toxicity in pediatric ALL. Precise HLA typing and matching resulted in a low incidence of acute and extensive chronic GVHD which is an important achievement for the quality of life in children and adolescents. The results from this study demonstrate the feasibility of a harmonized HSCT approach in pediatric ALL.Wstęp. Ostra białaczka limfoblastyczna (ALL) jest najczęstszym wskazaniem do przeszczepiania allogenicznych hematopoetycznych komórek macierzystych (allo-HSCT) u dzieci. Celem pracy była analiza wyników leczenia ALL u dzieci poddawanych allo-HSCT w ośrodku bydgoskim. Pacjenci i metodyka. Badaniami objęto 41 pacjentów leczonych w latach 2003-2012. W 17 przypadkach wykonano transplantację od dawcy rodzinnego, a w 24 od dawcy niespokrewnionego. Źródłem komórek hematopoetycznych była krew obwodowa u 21 pacjentów, szpik kostny u 18 pacjentów oraz krew pępowinowa u 2 pacjentów. Wyniki. W momencie zakończenia analizy żyło 27 (65,8%) pacjentów. Spośród 14 zgonów, 8 było zależnych od procedur transplantacyjnych, a 6 od wznowy choroby podstawowej. Śmiertelność zależna od powikłań transplantacyjnych wyniosła 8/41 (19,5%), w tym 7 (17%) we wczesnym okresie poprzeszczepowym (do dnia +100). Prawdopodobieństwo przeżycia dla całej badanej grupy wyniosło: pDFS=0,652±0,091 (średnie przeżycie bez wznowy 3,8 lat, 95%CI=2,7-4,8 lat), pOS=0,630±0,080 (średnie przeżycie 3,9 lat, 95%CI=3,0-4,8 lat). Jedynym czynnikiem prognostycznym terapii był czas wystąpienia wznowy kwalifikującej do transplantacji: dla wznów bardzo wczesnych pOS=0,333±0,157, dla wznów wczesnych pOS=0,666±0,272 i dla późnych pOS=0,833±0,152 (p=0,010). Wnioski. Allo-HSCT od zgodnych dawców rodzinnych lub niespokrewnionych jest efektywną terapią o akceptowalnej toksyczności w ALL. Precyzyjny dobór dawcy skutkuje niskim odsetkiem ostrej i przewlekłej GVHD, co może wpływać na jakość życia. Wyniki przeprowadzonej analizy pokazują kierunki terapii z zastosowaniem HSCT w ALL u dzieci i młodzieży

Changing risk factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: experience from Kujawsko-Pomorski region 1976–2018

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. Risk factors in childhood ALL have changed during recent decades, mostly due to treatment personalization. The aim of this study was to analyze therapy results and prognostic factors in childhood ALL in the Kujawsko-Pomorski region of Poland between 1976 and 2018. Material and methods: Data from 495 patients (0–18 years old) diagnosed with ALL from the Kujawsko-Pomorski region between 1976 and 2018 was analyzed. Prognostic factors were analyzed separately in specific therapeutic groups, which were defined by several therapy protocols. Results: Prognostic factors have changed over the course of consecutive therapeutic periods. Between 1976 and 1988 (the first and second therapeutic protocols), central nervous system involvement was the most important risk factor. During the third therapeutic period, an unsatisfactory treatment response on days 8 and 14 was related to a poor outcome. In 1995–2002, the risk factors were hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymph nodes involvement, and unsatisfactory therapy response on days 15 and 33. Between 2002 and 2011, immunophenotype other than ‘common’ and hemoglobin level at diagnosis were the risk factors, and a lack of BCR-ABL aberration was related to better therapy results. During the final analyzed period (2011–2018), failure to achieve remission on day 33 was a risk factor, and patients classified as non-high risk group and those aged <6 years had better outcomes. Conclusions: The changing profile of risk factors in ALL has reflected progress in ALL therapy, with the gradual elimination of factors related to poor outcomes, mostly due to modifications in treatment and the development of diagnostic methods as well as therapy monitoring