Coinfections and their molecular consequences in the porcine respiratory tract

Understudied, coinfections are more frequent in pig farms than single infections. In pigs, the term “Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex” (PRDC) is often used to describe coinfections involving viruses such as swine Influenza A Virus (swIAV), Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), and Porcine CircoVirus type 2 (PCV2) as well as bacteria like Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Bordetella bronchiseptica. The clinical outcome of the various coinfection or superinfection situations is usually assessed in the studies while in most of cases there is no clear elucidation of the fine mechanisms shaping the complex interactions occurring between microorganisms. In this comprehensive review, we aimed at identifying the studies dealing with coinfections or superinfections in the pig respiratory tract and at presenting the interactions between pathogens and, when possible, the mechanisms controlling them. Coinfections and superinfections involving viruses and bacteria were considered while research articles including protozoan and fungi were excluded. We discuss the main limitations complicating the interpretation of coinfection/superinfection studies, and the high potential perspectives in this fascinating research field, which is expecting to gain more and more interest in the next years for the obvious benefit of animal health

Etudes comparées de la pathogenèse des virus grippaux chez le porc pré-infecté ou non par Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae

Swine influenza is an enzootic infection affecting 50% of the French livestock. The infection can be unnoticed but can also induce high morbidity among batches of affected animals, resulting in lower production performance and significant economic losses. The severity of influenza A virus in pig is influenced by many factors such as the virus strain, husbandry practices, the immune status of animals, concomitant infections with other respiratory pathogens, etc. In the same way, various epidemiological forms of influenza exist in farms. Thus, infections can be repeated in all successive batches within a farm, especially among young animals with passive immunity. In order to better understand the clinical and epidemiological diversity of the swine flu, and help develop appropriate strategies to control the disease, we tried to bring new knowledge about factors that promote the exacerbation of the flu syndrome and/or its recurrence, and more generally to give new information about the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of influenza viruses in pigs, in relation to the response of the infected host. Firstly, we compared, through experimental infections of specific pathogen free pigs, the pathogenicity of the two swine influenza viruses mostly detected in pigs in France, i.e. one from the European “avian-like swine H1N1” lineage (H1avN1) and the other one from the European “human-like reassortant swine H1N2” lineage (H1huN2), each one alone or in co-infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), another respiratory pathogen widespread in French farms. We showed that the H1huN2 infection induced a more marked pathology than the H1avN1 infection, and that Mhp pre-infection induced the exacerbation of the H1avN1, but not the H1huN2, infection. Then, we used the Mhp/H1avN1 co-infection model to evaluate alternative approaches that could reduce the impact of influenza infections and their complications: firstly, a supply of compounds with antioxidant properties in food; and secondly, a feed restriction of short duration. In both cases, we showed beneficial effects on zootechnical parameters the days following influenza infection. This work has also brought new knowledge on modulation of oxidative stress markers in plasma, as well as metabolic changes following the co-infection with Mhp and H1avN1 in pigs. The severity of flu clinical manifestations being related, among other, to the quality of the immune responses developed by the infected host, we studied these responses in pigs experimentally infected by H1avN1 and assessed the impact of factors such as the presence of Mhp or maternal derived antibodies on these responses. We showed that the viral infection induced inflammation and interferon response. The Mhp pre-infection exerted an additive effect on inflammation of lung tissue and may promote the virus persistence in the lung. Finally, we have shown that the presence of maternally-derived immunity protected the piglets clinically but did not prevent viral shedding, delayed the T cell response and strongly inhibited the post-infectious humoral response. However, despite the failed humoral immune response, animals were completely protected from a second infection occurring when maternal antibodies had disappeared. Therefore, this work have brought new knowledge on factors influencing influenza infection in pig as well as the underlying mechanisms, which is a prerequisite for improving disease control. They allow, between-other, to consider improving the health and welfare of animals by acting on their diet.La grippe porcine est une infection enzootique touchant 50% du cheptel français. Elle passe parfois inaperçue, mais peut également induire une forte morbidité au sein des lots d’animaux touchés, entraînant une baisse des performances zootechniques et des pertes économiques importantes. La sévérité de l’infection à virus influenza A chez le porc peut dépendre de divers facteurs, comme les virus eux-mêmes, les pratiques d’élevage, le statut immunitaire des animaux, les infections concomitantes par d’autres pathogènes respiratoires, etc. De la même manière, diverses formes épidémiologiques de la grippe existent en élevage. Ainsi, des infections peuvent se répéter à un âge déterminé, sur toutes les bandes successives d’un élevage, notamment chez des jeunes présentant une immunité passive. Afin de mieux comprendre cette diversité clinique et épidémiologique de la grippe porcine, et aider à l’élaboration de stratégies d’intervention adéquates pour le contrôle de la maladie, nous avons cherché à apporter de nouvelles connaissances quant à certains facteurs pouvant favoriser l’exacerbation du syndrome grippal et/ou son caractère récurrent, et plus généralement aux mécanismes sous-jacents à la pathogenèse des virus influenza A chez le porc, en relation avec les réponses de l’hôte infecté. Nous avons d’abord comparé, suite à inoculations expérimentales de porcs exempts d’organismes pathogènes spécifiés, la pathogénicité des deux virus influenza porcins les plus fréquemment rencontrés chez le porc en France, l’un du lignage européen « avian-like swine H1N1 » (H1avN1), l’autre du lignage européen « human-like reassortant swine H1N2 » (H1huN2), seuls ou en association avec Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), autre pathogène respiratoire répandu en élevage. Nous avons montré que l’infection H1huN2 induit une pathologie plus marquée que l’infection H1avN1, et que la pré-infection des porcs par Mhp induit une exacerbation de l’infection H1avN1, mais pas H1huN2. Nous avons utilisé le modèle de co-infection Mhp/H1avN1 pour évaluer deux approches alternatives qui permettraient de diminuer l’impact des infections grippales et de leurs complications : l’apport de composés aux propriétés antioxydantes via l’alimentation ; et la restriction alimentaire de courte durée. Dans ces deux cas nous avons montré des effets bénéfiques sur les paramètres zootechniques pendant les jours suivant l’infection grippale. Ce travail a également apporté de nouvelles connaissances quant aux modifications des marqueurs plasmatiques de stress oxydant, ainsi que sur les modifications métaboliques faisant suite à la co-infection Mhp/H1avN1. La sévérité des manifestations cliniques de la grippe étant liée à la qualité de la réponse immunitaire mise en place chez l’hôte infecté, nous avons entrepris d‘étudier les réponses immunitaires du porc touché par la grippe et d’évaluer l’impact de facteurs tels que la présence de Mhp ou d’anticorps d’origine maternelle sur ces réponses. Nous avons ainsi montré que l’infection virale induit une inflammation et une réponse interféron. La pré-infection par Mhp exercerait un effet additif sur cette inflammation et pourrait favoriser la persistance du virus dans le poumon. Nous avons également montré que la présence d’immunité passive protège cliniquement le porcelet mais n’empêche pas l’excrétion du virus, retarde la réponse lymphocytaire T et inhibe la réponse humorale post-infectieuse. Malgré la réponse immunitaire humorale défaillante, les animaux étaient totalement protégés d’une seconde infection homologue lorsque les anticorps maternels avaient disparus. Ces travaux ont permis d’apporter de nouvelles connaissances sur les facteurs influençant l’infection grippale en élevage porcin ainsi que sur les mécanismes sous-jacents, ce qui est une prérequis pour l’amélioration des mesures de lutte et de maitrise de la maladie. Ils permettent, d’envisager d’améliorer la santé des animaux en agissant sur leur régime alimentaire

Comparative studies of swine influenza virus pathogenesis in pigs pre-infected or not by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae

La grippe porcine est une infection enzootique touchant 50% du cheptel français. Elle passe parfois inaperçue, mais peut également induire une forte morbidité au sein des lots d’animaux touchés, entraînant une baisse des performances zootechniques et des pertes économiques importantes. La sévérité de l’infection à virus influenza A chez le porc peut dépendre de divers facteurs, comme les virus eux-mêmes, les pratiques d’élevage, le statut immunitaire des animaux, les infections concomitantes par d’autres pathogènes respiratoires, etc. De la même manière, diverses formes épidémiologiques de la grippe existent en élevage. Ainsi, des infections peuvent se répéter à un âge déterminé, sur toutes les bandes successives d’un élevage, notamment chez des jeunes présentant une immunité passive. Afin de mieux comprendre cette diversité clinique et épidémiologique de la grippe porcine, et aider à l’élaboration de stratégies d’intervention adéquates pour le contrôle de la maladie, nous avons cherché à apporter de nouvelles connaissances quant à certains facteurs pouvant favoriser l’exacerbation du syndrome grippal et/ou son caractère récurrent, et plus généralement aux mécanismes sous-jacents à la pathogenèse des virus influenza A chez le porc, en relation avec les réponses de l’hôte infecté. Nous avons d’abord comparé, suite à inoculations expérimentales de porcs exempts d’organismes pathogènes spécifiés, la pathogénicité des deux virus influenza porcins les plus fréquemment rencontrés chez le porc en France, l’un du lignage européen « avian-like swine H1N1 » (H1avN1), l’autre du lignage européen « human-like reassortant swine H1N2 » (H1huN2), seuls ou en association avec Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), autre pathogène respiratoire répandu en élevage. Nous avons montré que l’infection H1huN2 induit une pathologie plus marquée que l’infection H1avN1, et que la pré-infection des porcs par Mhp induit une exacerbation de l’infection H1avN1, mais pas H1huN2. Nous avons utilisé le modèle de co-infection Mhp/H1avN1 pour évaluer deux approches alternatives qui permettraient de diminuer l’impact des infections grippales et de leurs complications : l’apport de composés aux propriétés antioxydantes via l’alimentation ; et la restriction alimentaire de courte durée. Dans ces deux cas nous avons montré des effets bénéfiques sur les paramètres zootechniques pendant les jours suivant l’infection grippale. Ce travail a également apporté de nouvelles connaissances quant aux modifications des marqueurs plasmatiques de stress oxydant, ainsi que sur les modifications métaboliques faisant suite à la co-infection Mhp/H1avN1. La sévérité des manifestations cliniques de la grippe étant liée à la qualité de la réponse immunitaire mise en place chez l’hôte infecté, nous avons entrepris d‘étudier les réponses immunitaires du porc touché par la grippe et d’évaluer l’impact de facteurs tels que la présence de Mhp ou d’anticorps d’origine maternelle sur ces réponses. Nous avons ainsi montré que l’infection virale induit une inflammation et une réponse interféron. La pré-infection par Mhp exercerait un effet additif sur cette inflammation et pourrait favoriser la persistance du virus dans le poumon. Nous avons également montré que la présence d’immunité passive protège cliniquement le porcelet mais n’empêche pas l’excrétion du virus, retarde la réponse lymphocytaire T et inhibe la réponse humorale post-infectieuse. Malgré la réponse immunitaire humorale défaillante, les animaux étaient totalement protégés d’une seconde infection homologue lorsque les anticorps maternels avaient disparus. Ces travaux ont permis d’apporter de nouvelles connaissances sur les facteurs influençant l’infection grippale en élevage porcin ainsi que sur les mécanismes sous-jacents, ce qui est une prérequis pour l’amélioration des mesures de lutte et de maitrise de la maladie. Ils permettent, d’envisager d’améliorer la santé des animaux en agissant sur leur régime alimentaire.Swine influenza is an enzootic infection affecting 50% of the French livestock. The infection can be unnoticed but can also induce high morbidity among batches of affected animals, resulting in lower production performance and significant economic losses. The severity of influenza A virus in pig is influenced by many factors such as the virus strain, husbandry practices, the immune status of animals, concomitant infections with other respiratory pathogens, etc. In the same way, various epidemiological forms of influenza exist in farms. Thus, infections can be repeated in all successive batches within a farm, especially among young animals with passive immunity. In order to better understand the clinical and epidemiological diversity of the swine flu, and help develop appropriate strategies to control the disease, we tried to bring new knowledge about factors that promote the exacerbation of the flu syndrome and/or its recurrence, and more generally to give new information about the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of influenza viruses in pigs, in relation to the response of the infected host. Firstly, we compared, through experimental infections of specific pathogen free pigs, the pathogenicity of the two swine influenza viruses mostly detected in pigs in France, i.e. one from the European “avian-like swine H1N1” lineage (H1avN1) and the other one from the European “human-like reassortant swine H1N2” lineage (H1huN2), each one alone or in co-infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), another respiratory pathogen widespread in French farms. We showed that the H1huN2 infection induced a more marked pathology than the H1avN1 infection, and that Mhp pre-infection induced the exacerbation of the H1avN1, but not the H1huN2, infection. Then, we used the Mhp/H1avN1 co-infection model to evaluate alternative approaches that could reduce the impact of influenza infections and their complications: firstly, a supply of compounds with antioxidant properties in food; and secondly, a feed restriction of short duration. In both cases, we showed beneficial effects on zootechnical parameters the days following influenza infection. This work has also brought new knowledge on modulation of oxidative stress markers in plasma, as well as metabolic changes following the co-infection with Mhp and H1avN1 in pigs. The severity of flu clinical manifestations being related, among other, to the quality of the immune responses developed by the infected host, we studied these responses in pigs experimentally infected by H1avN1 and assessed the impact of factors such as the presence of Mhp or maternal derived antibodies on these responses. We showed that the viral infection induced inflammation and interferon response. The Mhp pre-infection exerted an additive effect on inflammation of lung tissue and may promote the virus persistence in the lung. Finally, we have shown that the presence of maternally-derived immunity protected the piglets clinically but did not prevent viral shedding, delayed the T cell response and strongly inhibited the post-infectious humoral response. However, despite the failed humoral immune response, animals were completely protected from a second infection occurring when maternal antibodies had disappeared. Therefore, this work have brought new knowledge on factors influencing influenza infection in pig as well as the underlying mechanisms, which is a prerequisite for improving disease control. They allow, between-other, to consider improving the health and welfare of animals by acting on their diet

Genetic Diversity among Pseudorabies Viruses Isolated from Dogs in France from 2006 to 2018

Pseudorabies (PR), also known as Aujeszky’s disease, is an economically important disease for the pig industry. It has been eradicated in domestic pigs in many European countries, including France, but its causative agent—Suid Herpesvirus 1—is still circulating in wild boars. The risk of endemic PR in wild fauna lies in reintroducing the virus among domestic pigs and transmitting it to other mammals, especially hunting dogs for which the disease is rapidly fatal. As such infections are regularly reported in France, this study genetically characterized canine PR virus strains in the country to obtain information on their diversity and evolution. Partial sequencing of the glycoprotein C-encoding gene from 55 virus strains isolated from dogs between 2006 and 2018 showed that 14 strains belonged to genotype I-clade A and another 38 to genotype I-clade B, two clades usually reported in Western Europe. More surprisingly, three strains were found to belong to genotype II, suggesting an Asian origin. Genotype I-clade A strains exhibited the highest diversity as five geographically segregated genogroups were identified

Comparison of Early Responses to Avian-Like Swine H1n1 Virus Infection in Naïve Pigs and in Pigs Pre-Infected with <em>Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae</em>

International audienc

Impact of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae pre-infection on Influenza infection outcome in the porcine model

National audienc

Comparison of innate immune responses to infection with swine influenza virus H1N1 in naïve pigs and pigs pre-infected with <em>Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae</em>

International audienc

Evaluation of the Pathogenicity and the Escape from Vaccine Protection of a New Antigenic Variant Derived from the European Human-Like Reassortant Swine H1N2 Influenza Virus

The surveillance of swine influenza A viruses in France revealed the emergence of an antigenic variant following deletions and mutations that are fixed in the HA-encoding gene of the European human-like reassortant swine H1N2 lineage. In this study, we compared the outcomes of the parental (H1huN2) and variant (H1huN2&Delta;14&ndash;147) virus infections in experimentally-inoculated piglets. Moreover, we assessed and compared the protection that was conferred by an inactivated vaccine currently licensed in Europe. Three groups of five unvaccinated or vaccinated piglets were inoculated with H1huN2 or H1huN2&Delta;14&ndash;147 or mock-inoculated, respectively. In unvaccinated piglets, the variant strain induced greater clinical signs than the parental virus, in relation to a higher inflammatory response that involves TNF-&alpha; production and a huge afflux of granulocytes into the lung. However, both infections led to similar levels of virus excretion and adaptive (humoral and cellular) immune responses in blood. The vaccinated animals were clinically protected from both infectious challenges and did not exhibit any inflammatory responses, regardless the inoculated virus. However, whereas vaccination prevented virus shedding in H1huN2-infected animals, it did not completely inhibit the multiplication of the variant strain, since live virus particles were detected in nasal secretions that were taken from H1huN2&Delta;14&ndash;147-inoculated vaccinated piglets. This difference in the level of vaccine protection was probably related to the poorer ability of the post-vaccine antibodies to neutralize the variant virus than the parental virus, even though post-vaccine cellular immunity appeared to be equally effective against both viruses. These results suggest that vaccine antigens would potentially need to be updated if this variant becomes established in Europe

Effect of feed restriction on performance and postprandial nutrient metabolism in pigs co-infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and swine influenza virus.

As nutritional status and inflammation are strongly connected, feeding and nutritional strategies could be effective to improve the ability of pigs to cope with disease. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of a feed restriction on the ability of pigs to resist and be tolerant to a coinfection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp) and the European H1N1 swine influenza virus, and the consequences for nutrient metabolism, with a focus on amino acids. Two groups of specific pathogen-free pigs were inoculated with Mhp and H1N1 21 days apart. One group was fed ad libitum, the other group was subjected to a two-week 40% feed restriction starting one week before H1N1 infection. The two respective mock control groups were included. Three days post-H1N1 infection, 200 g of feed was given to pigs previously fasted overnight and serial blood samples were taken over 4 hours to measure plasma nutrient concentrations. Throughout the study, clinical signs were observed and pathogens were detected in nasal swabs and lung tissues. Feed-restricted pigs presented shorter hyperthermia and a positive mean weight gain over the 3 days post-H1N1 infection whereas animals fed ad libitum lost weight. Both infection and feed restriction reduced postprandial glucose concentrations, indicating changes in glucose metabolism. Post-prandial plasma concentrations of the essential amino acids histidine, arginine and threonine were lower in co-infected pigs suggesting a greater use of those amino acids for metabolic purposes associated with the immune response. Altogether, these results indicate that modifying feeding practices could help to prepare animals to overcome an influenza infection. Connections with metabolism changes are discussed

Serological Survey of Aujeszky’s Disease in Wild Boar from Southeastern France

International audienceAujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), also known as pseudorabies virus, causes an important neurological infection with a major economic and health impact on animal husbandry. Here, we serologically screened muscle fluid from wild boar (Sus scrofa) for the presence of anti-ADV antibodies. Animals were caught during two hunting seasons (2019–2020 and 2021–2022) from three areas in southeastern France known to be endemic with wild boar populations. A total of 30.33% of the 399 tested animals scored positive for anti-glycoprotein B antibodies directed against ADV using a commercial competitive ELISA test. A significant effect (p-value < 0.0001) of the geographical location and animal age on ADV seroprevalence was observed. The results of this study confirmed the importance of wild boar in the epidemiology of ADV in southeastern France