Varieties of Cost Functions

Regular cost functions were introduced as a quantitative generalisation of regular languages, retaining many of their equivalent characterisations and decidability properties. For instance, stabilisation monoids play the same role for cost functions as monoids do for regular languages. The purpose of this article is to further extend this algebraic approach by generalising two results on regular languages to cost functions: Eilenberg\u27s varieties theorem and profinite equational characterisations of lattices of regular languages. This opens interesting new perspectives, but the specificities of cost functions introduce difficulties that prevent these generalisations to be straightforward. In contrast, although syntactic algebras can be defined for formal power series over a commutative ring, no such notion is known for series over semirings and in particular over the tropical semiring

Universality and Forall-Exactness of Cost Register Automata with Few Registers

The universality problem asks whether a given finite state automaton accepts all the input words. For quantitative models of automata, where input words are mapped to real values, this is naturally extended to ask whether all the words are mapped to values above (or below) a given threshold. This is known to be undecidable for commonly studied examples such as weighted automata over the positive rational (plus-times) or the integer tropical (min-plus) semirings, or equivalently cost register automata (CRAs) over these semirings. In this paper, we prove that when restricted to CRAs with only three registers, the universality problem is still undecidable, even with additional restrictions for the CRAs to be copyless linear with resets. In contrast, we show that, assuming the unary encoding of updates, the ?-exact problem (does the CRA output zero on all the words?) for integer min-plus linear CRAs can be decided in polynomial time if the number of registers is constant. Without the restriction on the number of registers this problem is known to be PSPACE-complete

The Big-O Problem for Max-Plus Automata is Decidable (PSPACE-Complete)

We show that the big-O problem for max-plus automata is decidable and PSPACE-complete. The big-O (or affine domination) problem asks whether, given two max-plus automata computing functions f and g, there exists a constant c such that f < cg+ c. This is a relaxation of the containment problem asking whether f < g, which is undecidable. Our decidability result uses Simon's forest factorisation theorem, and relies on detecting specific elements, that we call witnesses, in a finite semigroup closed under two special operations: stabilisation and flattening

Comparison of Max-Plus Automata and Joint Spectral Radius of Tropical Matrices

Weighted automata over the tropical semiring Zmax are closely related to finitely generated semigroups of matrices over Zmax. In this paper, we use results in automata theory to study two quantities associated with sets of matrices: the joint spectral radius and the ultimate rank. We prove that these two quantities are not computable over the tropical semiring, i.e. there is no algorithm that takes as input a finite set of matrices S and provides as output the joint spectral radius (resp. the ultimate rank) of S. On the other hand, we prove that the joint spectral radius is nevertheless approximable and we exhibit restricted cases in which the joint spectral radius and the ultimate rank are computable. To reach this aim, we study the problem of comparing functions computed by weighted automata over the tropical semiring. This problem is known to be undecidable, and we prove that it remains undecidable in some specific subclasses of automata

Alternating weak automata from universal trees

An improved translation from alternating parity automata on infinite words to alternating weak automata is given. The blow-up of the number of states is related to the size of the smallest universal ordered trees and hence it is quasi-polynomial, and it is polynomial if the asymptotic number of priorities is at most logarithmic in the number of states. This is an exponential improvement on the translation of Kupferman and Vardi (2001) and a quasi-polynomial improvement on the translation of Boker and Lehtinen (2018). Any slightly better such translation would (if - like all presently known such translations - it is efficiently constructive) lead to algorithms for solving parity games that are asymptotically faster in the worst case than the current state of the art (Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan, 2017; Jurdzinski and Lazic, 2017; and Fearnley, Jain, Schewe, Stephan, and Wojtczak, 2017), and hence it would yield a significant breakthrough

Universality and Forall-Exactness of Cost Register Automata with Few Registers

The universality problem asks whether a given finite state automaton accepts all the input words. For quantitative models of automata, where input words are mapped to real values, this is naturally extended to ask whether all the words are mapped to values above (or below) a given threshold. This is known to be undecidable for commonly studied examples such as weighted automata over the positive rational (plus-times) or the integer tropical (min-plus) semirings, or equivalently cost register automata (CRAs) over these semirings. In this paper, we prove that when restricted to CRAs with only three registers, the universality problem is still undecidable, even with additional restrictions for the CRAs to be copyless linear with resets. In contrast, we show that, assuming the unary encoding of updates, the ForAll-exact problem (does the CRA output zero on all the words?) for integer min-plus linear CRAs can be decided in polynomial time if the number of registers is constant. Without the restriction on the number of registers this problem is known to be PSPACE-complete

Sets Which Contain a Quadratic Residue Modulo p for Almost All p

In a mean-payoff parity game, one of the two players aims both to achieve a qualitative parity objective and to minimize a quantitative long-term average of payoffs (aka. mean payoff). The game is zero-sum and hence the aim of the other player is to either foil the parity objective or to maximize the mean payoff. Our main technical result is a pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving mean-payoff parity games. All algorithms for the problem that have been developed for over a decade have a pseudo-polynomial and an exponential factors in their running times; in the running time of our algorithm the latter is replaced with a quasi-polynomial one. By the results of Chatterjee and Doyen (2012) and of Schewe, Weinert, and Zimmermann (2018), our main technical result implies that there are pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity energy games and for solving parity games with weights. Our main conceptual contributions are the definitions of strategy decompositions for both players, and a notion of progress measures for mean-payoff parity games that generalizes both parity and energy progress measures. The former provides normal forms for and succinct representations of winning strategies, and the latter enables the application to mean-payoff parity games of the order-theoretic machinery that underpins a recent quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving parity games

Comparison between numerical and experimental results on thermoconvective instabilities of a high-Prandtl-number liquid

International audienceThe flow structuration of silicon oil ͑Prandtl number of 10.3͒ in a open cylindrical pool heated from the center of the surface is investigated numerically. Our purpose is to perform the numerical simulation of experimental results obtained by Favre et al. ͓Phys. Fluids 9, 1473 ͑1997͔͒ who observed transitions between steady and axisymmetric flows at sufficiently low values of the Marangoni number ͑Ma͒ and various types of instability depending on the height of the fluid. The hydrothermal wave regime has been obtained at critical values of Ma which depend on the Bond number and on the aspect ratio. The numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental ones

Formal and Empirical Studies of Counting Behaviour in ReLU RNNs

In recent years, the discussion about systematicity of neural network learning has gained renewed interest, in particular the formal analysis of neural network behaviour. In this paper, we investigate the capability of single-cell ReLU RNN models to demonstrate precise counting behaviour. Formally, we start by characterising the semi-Dyck-1 language and semi-Dyck-1 counter machine that can be implemented by a single Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) cell. We define three Counter Indicator Conditions (CICs) on the weights of a ReLU cell and show that fulfilling these conditions is equivalent to accepting the semi-Dyck-1 language, i.e. to perform exact counting. Empirically, we study the ability of single-cell ReLU RNNs to learn to count by training and testing them on different datasets of Dyck-1 and semi-Dyck-1 strings. While networks that satisfy the CICs count exactly and thus correctly even on very long strings, the trained networks exhibit a wide range of results and never satisfy the CICs exactly. We investigate the effect of deviating from the CICs and find that configurations that fulfil the CICs are not at a minimum of the loss function in the most common setups. This is consistent with observations in previous research indicating that training ReLU networks for counting tasks often leads to poor results. We finally discuss implications of these results and possible avenues for improving network behaviour

Orthogonality in the Category of Complexes

Several distinct techniques have been proposed to design quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity games since the breakthrough result of Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan (2017): play summaries, progress measures and register games. We argue that all those techniques can be viewed as instances of the separation approach to solving parity games, a key technical component of which is constructing (explicitly or implicitly) an automaton that separates languages of words encoding plays that are (decisively) won by either of the two players. Our main technical result is a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of such separating automata that nearly matches the current best upper bounds. This forms a barrier that all existing approaches must overcome in the ongoing quest for a polynomial-time algorithm for solving parity games. The key and fundamental concept that we introduce and study is a universal ordered tree. The technical highlights are a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of universal ordered trees and a proof that every separating safety automaton has a universal tree hidden in its state space