Tc-99m-NTP 15-5 assessment of the early therapeutic response of chondrosarcoma to zoledronic acid in the Swarm rat orthotopic model

Background: Since proteoglycans (PGs) appear as key partners in chondrosarcoma biology, PG-targeted imaging using the radiotracer 99mTc-N-(triethylammonium)-3-propyl-[15]ane-N5 (99mTc-NTP 15-5) developed by our group was previously demonstrated to be a good single-photon emission computed tomography tracer for cartilage neoplasms. We therefore initiated this new preclinical study to evaluate the relevance of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 imaging for the in vivo monitoring and quantitative assessment of chondrosarcoma response to zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the Swarm rat orthotopic model. Findings: Rats bearing chondrosarcoma in the orthotopic paratibial location were treated by ZOL (100 μg/kg, subcutaneously) or phosphate-buffered saline, twice a week, from day 4 to day 48 post-tumor implantation. 99mTc-NTP 15-5 imaging was performed at regular intervals with the target-to-background ratio (TBR) determined. Tumor volume was monitored using a calliper, and histology was performed at the end of the study. From day 11 to day 48, mean TBR values ranged from 1.7 ± 0.6 to 2.3 ± 0.6 in ZOL-treated rats and from 2.1 ± 1.0 to 4.9 ± 0.9 in controls. Tumor growth inhibition was evidenced using a calliper from day 24 and associated to a decrease in PG content in treated tumor tissues (confirmed by histology). Conclusions: This work demonstrated two proofs of concept: (1) biphosphonate therapy could be a promising therapeutic approach for chondrosarcoma; (2) 99mTc-NTP 15-5 is expected to offer a novel imaging modality for the in vivo evaluation of the extracellular matrix features of chondrosarcoma, which could be useful for the follow-up and quantitative assessment of proteoglycan ‘downregulation’ associated to the response to therapeutic attempts

Recommandations du GEFPICS concernant la phase pré-analytique pour l’évaluation de HER2 et des récepteurs hormonaux dans le cancer du sein : mise à jour 2014

Les tumeurs fixées et incluses en paraffine sont quotidiennement utilisées pour l’évaluation des biomarqueurs nécessaires au traitement des patientes atteintes d’un cancer du sein invasif. Les nouvelles recommandations internationales sur la phase pré-analytique ont été récemment revues, confirmant l’importance de la prise en charge optimale des prélèvements pour garantir des tests d’immunohistochimie ou d’hybridation in situ de qualité, quel que soit le biomarqueur envisagé. Incluant les procédés de fixation et de préparation des tissus, toutes les procédures pré-analytiques doivent être validées, standardisées et tracées. Elles nécessitent la collaboration et la formation de toutes les personnes impliquées dans le circuit du prélèvement, du préleveur jusqu’au technicien de pathologie et au pathologiste en passant par l’infirmière, ou le coursier. La prise en charge initiale optimale des pièces et une fixation de qualité sont des étapes majeures à maîtriser dans la phase pré-analytique. Cette mise à jour des recommandations du groupe d’étude des facteurs pronostiques immunohistochimiques dans le cancer du sein (GEFPICS) détaille et commente les différentes étapes pré-analytiques. L’observation de ces règles de bonne pratique, l’utilisation rigoureuse de témoins internes et externes et la participation régulière à des programmes d’assurance qualité sont autant de garanties pour une évaluation correcte et pérenne des biomarqueurs oncothéranostiques., Summary Biomarker assessment of breast cancer tumor samples is part of the routine workflow of pathology laboratories. International guidelines have recently been updated, with special regards to the pre-analytical steps that are critical for the quality of immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization procedures, whatever the biomarker analyzed. Fixation and specimen handling protocols must be standardized, validated and carefully tracked. Cooperation and training of the personnel involved in the specimen workflow (e.g. radiologists, surgeons, nurses, technicians and pathologists) are of paramount importance. The GEFPICS’ update of the recommendations herein details and comments the different steps of the pre-analytical process. Application of these guidelines and participation to quality insurance programs are mandatory to ensure the correct evaluation of oncotheranostic biomarkers

Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

Only a few papers have been published concerning the incidence and outcome of patients with a pathological complete response after cytotoxic treatment in breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients found to have a pathological complete response in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Our goal was also to determine whether the residual pathological size of the tumour in breast could be correlated with pathological node status. Between 1982 and 2000, 451 consecutive patients were registered into five prospective phase II trials. After six cycles, 396 patients underwent surgery with axillary dissection for 277 patients (69.9%). Pathological response was evaluated according to the Chevallier's classification. At a median follow-up of 8 years, survival was analysed as a function of pathological response. A pathological complete response rate was obtained in 60 patients (15.2%) after induction chemotherapy. Breast tumour persistence was significantly related to positive axillary nodes (P=5.10−6). At 15 years, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the group who had a pathological complete response than in the group who had less than a pathological complete response (P=0.047 and P=0.024, respectively). In the absence of pathological complete response and furthermore when there is a notable remaining pathological disease, axillary dissection is still important to determine a major prognostic factor and subsequently, a second non cross resistant adjuvant regimen or high dose chemotherapy could lead to a survival benefit

DRUG-RESISTANCE, SUPPORTIVE CARE AND DOSE INTENSITY

Background: Both intrinsic and acquired drug resistance occur in ovarian cancer. Much work on in vivo or in vitro, obtained drug resistance has been done and this knowledge is presently being converted into clinical studies. Materials and methods: The review focuses on the detoxifying system, MDR (multidrug resistance), and supportive care in relation to dose intensity. Results: In vitro models suggest that the amount of glutathione, glutathione S-transferase activity or metallothioneins could play a role in the outcome of chemotherapy treatment. The results of human tumour samples studies however do not support this idea. Expression of the cell membrane P-glycoprotein in tumour cells appears in vitro to be an important adverse prognostic factor concerning the effect of natural products. Again the results in human tumour samples vary. The supportive agent sodium thiosulphate protects against cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity, but the exact role of sulphur compounds in ameliorating the neurotoxicity is not yet established. The neuropeptide Org 2766 may be a possible neuro- protector. Hemopoietic growth factors such as GM-CSF, G-CSF and interleukin-3, protect the bone marrow to varying degrees. Autologous bone marrow transplantation induces high, but often short lasting response rates in chemotherapy resistant patients. Conclusions: More clinical studies on intervention of drug resistance and on high dose chemotherapy are needed to define the role of these strategies in ovarian cancer