European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unlike anything seen before by modern science-based medicine. As a scientific society, the European Association of Urology, via the guidelines, section offices, and the European Urology family of journals, we believe that it is important that we try to support urologists in this difficult situation. We aim to do this by providing tools that can facilitate decision making with the goal to minimise the impact and risks for both patients and health professionals delivering urological care, whenever possible, although it is clear that it is not always possible to mitigate them entirely. We hope that these revised recommendations will fill an important urological practice void and assist urologist surgeons across the globe as they do their very best to deal with the crisis of our generation

Novel use of Twitter to disseminate and evaluate adherence to clinical guidelines by the European Association of Urology

Item does not contain fulltex

Dissemination of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Through Social Media: Strategy, Results, and Future Developments

Over the past decade, social media (SoMe) platforms have been embraced by the medical community across all specialties. This engagement creates a valuable opportunity for scientific organizations to use the broad reach, accessibility, functionality, and informal environment of SoMe to raise awareness, reinforce trust with stakeholders, and disseminate scientific information. In this field, the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office has been a pioneer and has constantly set out to disseminate the recommendations established annually by its guidelines panels. Here we describe the dissemination strategy used by the EAU Guidelines Office and the results obtained in the past few years. The EAU Guidelines Office proposes various types of content to disseminate on the different SoMe platforms. An ad hoc dissemination committee adapts attractive content for different target audiences to fit the specific requirements of the platforms on which it is published. Over the past 5 yr, the dissemination committee has been able to constantly improve the engagement of different audiences, especially using Twitter, Facebook, and, more recently, Instagram. It has been shown that use of a multifaceted strategy to improve dissemination of the guidelines, such as campaigns for awareness days, is successful. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe the strategy used by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office to disseminate recommendations from the association's guidelines to different target audiences via social media and we summarize the main results

Providing a Framework for Meaningful Patient Involvement in Clinical Practice Guideline Development and Implementation

Acknowledgments: The EVOLVE research team acknowledges the valuable support and participation of Guideline Office staff and Guideline Panel members at the European Association of Urology (EAU). We would like to thank all study participants and patient and medical organisations who promoted the EVOLVE study. We also thank the following organisations for their help in study recruitment: Action Bladder Cancer; Cancer Research UK; Europa Uomo; EAU; European Association of Urology Nurses; European Cancer Patient Coalition; Fight Bladder Cancer; International Kidney Cancer Coalition; Kidney Cancer Support Network; UCAN Urological CANcer Charity; Prostate Cancer UK; and World Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition. The EVOLVE study is funded by the NHS Grampian Endowment Fund via the urological cancer charity UCAN.Peer reviewedPostprin

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: How We Ensure Transparent Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Management

Conflicts of interest (COIs) can potentially introduce a risk of bias into the assessment of evidence and the formulation of recommendations for guidelines. It is essential that a systematic process for the disclosure and management of COIs is adopted to minimise potential bias in the guideline development process.status: publishe

Male Sexual and Reproductive Health—Does the Urologist Have a Role in Addressing Gender Inequality in Life Expectancy?

Despite considerable public health initiatives in the past century, there remains a significant gender inequality in life expectancy. The Global Burden of Diseases study has highlighted that the life expectancy for men is 70.5 years, compared with 75.6 years for women. This discrepancy in mortality appears to be related to a disproportionately higher number of preventable and premature male deaths. Whilst there has been an increased focus on men's health, as evidenced by the establishment of men's health charities and governmental legislation promoting equality, a recent World Health Organization report has highlighted that there is still a prevailing misconception that the higher rate of premature mortality amongst men is a natural phenomenon. We explore the association of male sexual and reproductive health–related diseases and the potential role of a urologist in addressing gender inequality in life expectancy. Patient summary: In this report, we discuss the causes for the gender gap in life expectancy and highlight that men continue to have a higher rate of premature death than women, which is associated with diseases of the male reproductive system. Furthermore, this not only appears to be related to a number of metabolic and lifestyle factors, but may also be the result of the increased risk of cancer in men with sexual and reproductive health–related diseases. Globally, the life expectancy for men is 5.1 yr less than that of women. We describe the association between diseases of the male reproductive system and cardiovascular disease and cancers, and highlight the important role of a urologist in reducing premature male death

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office : How We Ensure Transparent Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Management

Conflicts of interest (COIs) can potentially introduce a risk of bias into the assessment of evidence and the formulation of recommendations for guidelines. It is essential that a systematic process for the disclosure and management of COIs is adopted to minimise potential bias in the guideline development process

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II—2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Background and objective: The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) have been updated. Here we provide a summary of the 2024 guidelines. Methods: The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence. Key findings and limitations: Risk stratification for relapsing PCa after primary therapy may guide salvage therapy decisions. New treatment options, such as androgen receptor–targeted agents (ARTAs), ARTA + chemotherapy combinations, PARP inhibitors and their combinations, and prostate-specific membrane antigen–based therapy have become available for men with metastatic PCa. Conclusions and clinical implications: Evidence for relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant PCa is evolving rapidly. These guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. The full version is available online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/). Patient summary: This article summarises the 2024 guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are based on evidence and guide doctors in discussing treatment decisions with their patients. The guidelines are updated every year

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer—2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

Background and objective The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa. Methods The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. Key findings and limitations A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment. Conclusions and clinical implications The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. Patient summary This article is the summary of the guidelines for “curable” prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is “found” through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with “active surveillance”, a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making