Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion

Background During locomotion, vision is used to perceive environmental obstacles that could potentially threaten stability; locomotor action is then modified to avoid these obstacles. Various factors such as lighting and texture can make these environmental obstacles appear larger or smaller than their actual size. It is unclear if gait is adapted based on the actual or perceived height of these environmental obstacles. The purposes of this study were to determine if visually guided action is scaled to visual perception, and to determine if task experience influenced how action is scaled to perception. Methodology/Principal Findings Participants judged the height of two obstacles before and after stepping over each of them 50 times. An illusion made obstacle one appear larger than obstacle two, even though they were identical in size. The influence of task experience was examined by comparing the perception-action relationship during the first five obstacle crossings (1–5) with the last five obstacle crossings (46–50). In the first set of trials, obstacle one was perceived to be 2.0 cm larger than obstacle two and subjects stepped 2.7 cm higher over obstacle one. After walking over the obstacle 50 times, the toe elevation was not different between obstacles, but obstacle one was still perceived as 2.4 cm larger. Conclusions/Significance There was evidence of locomotor adaptation, but no evidence of perceptual adaptation with experience. These findings add to research that demonstrates that while the motor system can be influenced by perception, it can also operate independent of perception

Perceptual modification of the built environment to influence behaviour associated with physical activity: Quasi-experimental field studies of a stair banister illusion

Re-engineering the built environment to influence behaviours associated with physical activity potentially provides an opportunity to promote healthier lifestyles at a population level. Here we present evidence from two quasi-experimental field studies in which we tested a novel, yet deceptively simple, intervention designed to alter perception of, and walking behaviour associated with, stairs in an urban area. Objectives. To examine whether stair banister adjustment has an influence on perceptions of stair steepness or on walking behaviour when approaching the stairs. Methods. In Study 1, we asked participants (n=143) to visually estimate the steepness of a set of stairs viewed from the top, when the stair banister was adjusted so that it converged with or diverged from the stairs (±1.91º) or remained neutral (±0º). In Study 2, the walking behaviour of participants (n=36) was filmed as they approached the stairs to descend, unaware that the banister converged, diverged or was neutral. Results. In Study 1, participants estimated the stairs to be steeper if the banister diverged from rather than converged with the stairs. The effect was greater when participants were unaware of the adjustment. In Study 2, walking speed was significantly slower when the banister diverged from rather than converged with the stairs. Conclusions. These findings encourage us to speculate about the potential to economically re-engineer features of the built environment in order to provide opportunities for action (affordances) that invite physical activity behaviour or even promote safer navigation of the environment

The visual field and visually guided behavior in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)

Bischof H-J. The visual field and visually guided behavior in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of Comparative Physiology, A: Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. 1988;163(3):329-337.Measurements were made of the physical properties of the visual system of the zebra finch, a bird with laterally placed eyes. The use of the visual system in pecking and courtship behavior was examined. It was demonstrated that the optical axis and the fovea of the eye point in a direction about 62.degree. from the sagittal axis of the head. The visual field of each eye covers about 170.degree. in the horizontal plane. In the frontal region there is an overlap of about 30.degree.-40.degree. where the birds can see binocularly; caudally there is a 'gap' in the visual field of 60.degree.. The point of best binocular viewing is in the sagittal plane at 16.5.degree. below the beak. Concerning movement detection, the upper threshold is 540.degree./s for the binocular (frontal) part of the visual field and about 1100.degree./s for the monocular (lateral) part. Most fixations before pecking occur monocularly. A preference for one eye during pecking was not detected. During the courtship song, a male bird directs its head towards the female. The results are discussed in comparison with findings in pigeons and chickens

Potential effects of climate change and rising CO 2 on ecosystem processes in northeastern U.S. forests

Climate change, CO 2 , Forest ecosystems, Carbon cycling, NPP, NEP, Nitrogen, Nitrate, Runoff,