Estimates of the Temperature and Melting Conditions of the Carpathian‐Pannonian Upper Mantle From Volcanism and Seismology

What drives the formation of basaltic melts beneath intraplate volcanoes not associated with extensive thermal anomalies or lithospheric extension? Detailed constraints on the melting conditions and source region are imperative to resolve this question. Here we model the geochemistry of alkali basalts and mantle nodules brought up by young (12–0.1 Ma) intraplate volcanoes distributed across the Carpathian-Pannonian region and combine the results with geophysical observations. Rare earth element inversion and forward calculation of elemental concentrations show that the basalts require the mantle to have undergone less than 1% melting in the garnet-spinel transition zone, at depths of about 63–72 km. The calculated melt distributions correspond to a mantle potential temperature of ∼1257°C, equivalent to a real temperature of 1290°C at 65 km beneath the Pannonian Basin. The composition, modal mineralogy, and clinopyroxene geochemistry of some of the entrained mantle nodules closely resemble the basalt source, though the latter equilibrated at greater depths. The gravity anomalies and topography of the Basin reveal no large-scale features that can account for the post-extensional volcanism. Instead, the lithospheric thickness and geotherm show that melting occurs because the base of the lithosphere, at ∼50-km depth, is close to or at the solidus temperature over a large part of the Basin. Hence, only a small amount of upwelling is required to produce minor volumes (up to a few cubic kilometers) of melt. We conclude that the Pannonian volcanism originates from upwelling in the asthenosphere just below thinned lithosphere, which is likely to be driven by thermal buoyancy

Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region

Anorogenic magmatism of the circum-Mediterranean area (the Tyrrhenian Sea, Sardinia, Sicily Channel, and the Middle East) and of continental Europe (the French Massif Central, Eifel, the Bohemian Massif, and the Pannonian basin) has been proposed to be related to the presence of one or more mantle plumes. Such conclusions based on geochemical data and seismic tomography are not fully justified because (1) a given chemical and isotopic composition of a magma can be explained by different petrogenetic models, (2) a given petrogenetic process can produce magmas with different chemical and isotopic composition, (3) tomographic studies do not furnish unique results (i.e., different models give different results), and (4) the commonly adopted interpretation of seismic wave velocity anomalies exclusively in terms of temperature is not unique; velocities are also dependent on other parameters, such as composition, melting, anisotropy, and anelasticity. Tomography and geochemistry are powerful tools but must be used in an interdisciplinary way, in combination with ge- odynamics and structural geology. Alone they cannot provide conclusive evidence for or against the existence of mantle plumes. The existence of large and/or extensive thermal anomalies under Europe is here considered unnecessary, because other models, based on the existence of upper-mantle heterogeneity, can explain the major-element, trace-element, and isotopic variability of the magmas. Volcanism in central Europe (the French Massif Central, Germany, and the Bohemian Massif) is concentrated in Cenozoic rifted areas and is here interpreted as the result of passive asthenosphere upwelling driven by decompression. Similarly, anorogenic magmatism in Sardinia, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Pannonian basin is explained as the result of lithospheric stretching in a back-arc geodynamic setting. The most important factors determining the locus and, in part, the geochemical characteristics of magmatic activity are the Moho and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary depths. Where both are shallowed by tectonic processes (e.g., in rift zones or back-arc basins), passive upwelling of asthenospheric mantle can explain the mag- matic activity. © 2007 The Geological Society of America