Infection of XC Cells by MLVs and Ebola Virus Is Endosome-Dependent but Acidification-Independent

Inhibitors of endosome acidification or cathepsin proteases attenuated infections mediated by envelope proteins of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) and Ebola virus, as well as ecotropic, amphotropic, polytropic, and xenotropic murine leukemia viruses (MLVs), indicating that infections by these viruses occur through acidic endosomes and require cathepsin proteases in the susceptible cells such as TE671 cells. However, as previously shown, the endosome acidification inhibitors did not inhibit these viral infections in XC cells. It is generally accepted that the ecotropic MLV infection in XC cells occurs at the plasma membrane. Because cathepsin proteases are activated by low pH in acidic endosomes, the acidification inhibitors may inhibit the viral infections by suppressing cathepsin protease activation. The acidification inhibitors attenuated the activities of cathepsin proteases B and L in TE671 cells, but not in XC cells. Processing of cathepsin protease L was suppressed by the acidification inhibitor in NIH3T3 cells, but again not in XC cells. These results indicate that cathepsin proteases are activated without endosome acidification in XC cells. Treatment with an endocytosis inhibitor or knockdown of dynamin 2 expression by siRNAs suppressed MLV infections in all examined cells including XC cells. Furthermore, endosomal cathepsin proteases were required for these viral infections in XC cells as other susceptible cells. These results suggest that infections of XC cells by the MLVs and Ebola virus occur through endosomes and pH-independent cathepsin activation induces pH-independent infection in XC cells

Evaluating Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An International, Paired, Noninferiority, Confirmatory Observer Study

Background and objective: Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a potential replacement for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). An extensive international multireader multicase observer study was conducted to assess the noninferiority of bpMRI to mpMRI in csPCa diagnosis. // Methods: An observer study was conducted with 400 mpMRI examinations from four European centers, excluding examinations with prior prostate treatment or csPCa (Gleason grade [GG] ≥2) findings. Readers assessed bpMRI and mpMRI sequentially, assigning lesion-specific Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (3–5) and a patient-level suspicion score (0–100). The noninferiority of patient-level bpMRI versus mpMRI csPCa diagnosis was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) alongside the sensitivity and specificity at PI-RADS ≥3 with a 5% margin. The secondary outcomes included insignificant prostate cancer (GG1) diagnosis, diagnostic evaluations at alternative risk thresholds, decision curve analyses (DCAs), and subgroup analyses considering reader expertise. Histopathology and ≥3 yr of follow-up were used for the reference standard. // Key findings and limitations: Sixty-two readers (45 centers and 20 countries) participated. The prevalence of csPCa was 33% (133/400); bpMRI and mpMRI showed similar AUROC values of 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.819–0.887) and 0.859 (95% CI, 0.826–0.893), respectively, with a noninferior difference of –0.6% (95% CI, –1.2% to 0.1%, p < 0.001). At PI-RADS ≥3, bpMRI and mpMRI had sensitivities of 88.6% (95% CI, 84.8–92.3%) and 89.4% (95% CI, 85.8–93.1%), respectively, with a noninferior difference of –0.9% (95% CI, –1.7% to 0.0%, p < 0.001), and specificities of 58.6% (95% CI, 52.3–63.1%) and 57.7% (95% CI, 52.3–63.1%), respectively, with a noninferior difference of 0.9% (95% CI, 0.0–1.8%, p < 0.001). At alternative risk thresholds, mpMRI increased sensitivity at the expense of reduced specificity. DCA demonstrated the highest net benefit for an mpMRI pathway in cancer-averse scenarios, whereas a bpMRI pathway showed greater benefit for biopsy-averse scenarios. A subgroup analysis indicated limited additional benefit of DCE MRI for nonexperts. Limitations included that biopsies were conducted based on mpMRI imaging, and reading was performed in a sequential order. // Conclusions and clinical implications: It has been found that bpMRI is noninferior to mpMRI in csPCa diagnosis at AUROC, along with the sensitivity and specificity at PI-RADS ≥3, showing its value in individuals without prior csPCa findings and prostate treatment. Additional randomized prospective studies are required to investigate the generalizability of outcomes

AI-Assisted vs Unassisted Identification of Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Images

Importance: Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment for prostate cancer shows promise for improving diagnostic accuracy but lacks large-scale observational evidence. Objective: To evaluate whether use of AI-assisted assessment for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on MRI is superior to unassisted readings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was conducted between March and July 2024 to compare unassisted and AI-assisted diagnostic performance using the AI system developed within the international Prostate Imaging-Cancer AI (PI-CAI) Consortium. The study involved 61 readers (34 experts and 27 nonexperts) from 53 centers across 17 countries. Readers assessed prostate magnetic resonance images both with and without AI assistance, providing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) annotations from 3 to 5 (higher PI-RADS indicated a higher likelihood of csPCa) and patient-level suspicion scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicated a greater likelihood of harboring csPCa). Biparametric prostate MRI examinations were included for 780 men from the PI-CAI study who were included in the newly-conducted observer study. All men within the PI-CAI study had suspicion of harboring prostate cancer, sufficient diagnostic image quality, and no prior clinically significant cancer findings. Disease presence was defined by histopathology, and absence was determined by 3 or more years of follow-up. The AI system was recalibrated using 420 Dutch examinations to generate lesion-detection maps, with AI scores ranging from 1 to 10, in which 10 indicates the highest likelihood of csPCa. The remaining 360 examinations, originating from 3 Dutch centers and 1 Norwegian center, were included in the observer study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was diagnosis of csPCa, evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity and specificity at a PI-RADS threshold of 3 or more. The secondary outcomes included analysis at alternate operating points and reader expertise. Results: Among the 360 examinations of 360 men (median age, 65 years [IQR, 62-70 years]) who were included for testing, 122 (34%) harbored csPCa. AI assistance was associated with significantly improved performance, achieving a 3.3% increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% CI, 1.8%-4.9%; P <.001), from 0.882 (95% CI, 0.854-0.910) in unassisted assessments to 0.916 (95% CI, 0.893-0.938) with AI assistance. Sensitivity improved by 2.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.9%; P <.001), from 94.3% (95% CI, 91.9%-96.7%) to 96.8% (95% CI, 95.2%-98.5%), and specificity increased by 3.4% (95% CI, 0.8%-6.0%; P =.01), from 46.7% (95% CI, 39.4%-54.0%) to 50.1% (95% CI, 42.5%-57.7%), at a PI-RADS score of 3 or more. Secondary analyses demonstrated similar performance improvements across alternate operating points and a greater benefit of AI assistance for nonexpert readers. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this diagnostic study of patients suspected of harboring prostate cancer suggest that AI assistance was associated with improved radiologic diagnosis of clinically significant disease. Further research is required to investigate the generalization of outcomes and effects on workflow improvement within prospective settings

Profiling Trait Anxiety: Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Cathepsin B (Ctsb) as a Novel Candidate Gene for Emotionality in Mice

Behavioral endophenotypes are determined by a multitude of counteracting but precisely balanced molecular and physiological mechanisms. In this study, we aim to identify potential novel molecular targets that contribute to the multigenic trait “anxiety”. We used microarrays to investigate the gene expression profiles of different brain regions within the limbic system of mice which were selectively bred for either high (HAB) or low (LAB) anxiety-related behavior, and also show signs of comorbid depression-like behavior

Cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening as an add-on to lung cancer screening in England

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer is available for high-risk individuals in England. Screening simultaneously for upper abdominal conditions, including cancer, is feasible. Here, we estimate the cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening, added onto lung cancer screening, based on the Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST) feasibility study. Methods: A multi-disease health economic model was developed. Ten cancers and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were modelled over a lifetime horizon. YKST data informed disease prevalence, resource use and screening costs. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness were estimated probabilistically. Results: Screening per person costs £70.89, produces 0.0059 QALYs, and has 96% probability of being cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,085. AAA contributes most to cost-effectiveness, followed by kidney cancer, but some cancer findings reduce cost-effectiveness. Screening is more cost-effective at younger ages. Screen-detectable disease prevalence, severity and mortality risk contribute most to uncertainty. Conclusions: One-off upper abdominal CT screening is potentially cost-effective, but costs, harms and benefits vary between conditions. Cost-effectiveness is driven by early diagnosis of AAA, then kidney cancer, illustrating the importance of considering all relevant diseases in screening models. A larger trial would provide more robust data to refine the cost-effectiveness argument. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0500519

Heparin modulates the endopeptidase activity of Leishmania mexicana cysteine protease cathepsin L-Like rCPB2.8

Cysteine protease B is considered crucial for the survival and infectivity of the Leishmania in its human host. Several microorganism pathogens bind to the heparin-like glycosaminoglycans chains of proteoglycans at host-cell surface to promote their attachment and internalization. Here, we have investigated the influence of heparin upon Leishmania mexicana cysteine protease rCPB2.8 activity. The data analysis revealed that the presence of heparin affects all steps of the enzyme reaction: (i) it decreases 3.5-fold the k1 and 4.0-fold the k−1, (ii) it affects the acyl-enzyme accumulation with pronounced decrease in k2 (2.7-fold), and also decrease in k3 (3.5-fold). The large values of ΔG = 12 kJ/mol for the association and dissociation steps indicate substantial structural strains linked to the formation/dissociation of the ES complex in the presence of heparin, which underscore a conformational change that prevents the diffusion of substrate in the rCPB2.8 active site. Binding to heparin also significantly decreases the α-helix content of the rCPB2.8 and perturbs the intrinsic fluorescence emission of the enzyme. The data strongly suggest that heparin is altering the ionization of catalytic (Cys25)-S−/(His163)-Im+ H ion pair of the rCPB2.8. Moreover, the interaction of heparin with the N-terminal pro-region of rCPB2.8 significantly decreased its inhibitory activity against the mature enzyme. Taken together, depending on their concentration, heparin-like glycosaminoglycans can either stimulate or antagonize the activity of cysteine protease B enzymes during parasite infection, suggesting that this glycoconjugate can anchor parasite cysteine protease at host cell surface

Expression and activity profiling of selected cysteine cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinases in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Cysteine cathepsins and matrix metalloproteases are considered to play important roles in the development of arthritic diseases. Their accumulation in synovial fluid of primarily rheumatoid arthritis patients is also well documented. However, a detailed comparison between the protease levels and activities between rheumatoid arthritis samples and osteoarthritis samples has never been made. Here, we report that both cysteine cathepsins B and S and matrix metalloproteases-1, -3 and -13 are detected in patient synovial fluid samples with significantly higher levels detected in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Among the proteases, cathepsin S was found to be significantly elevated, consistent with its critical role in the immune response. These results suggest that cysteine cathepsins have a major role in inflammation at least in rheumatoid arthritis. In addition to proteases, interleukin-6 was detected at significant levels in most samples, suggesting that proinflammatory cytokines might be in-volved in the stimulation of expression of these proteases during inflammation

Cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening as an add-on to lung cancer screening in England

Background Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer is available for high-risk individuals in England. Screening simultaneously for upper abdominal conditions, including cancer, is feasible. Here, we estimate the cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening, added onto lung cancer screening, based on the Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST) feasibility study. Methods A multi-disease health economic model was developed. Ten cancers and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were modelled over a lifetime horizon. YKST data informed disease prevalence, resource use and screening costs. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness were estimated probabilistically. Results Screening per person costs £70.89, produces 0.0059 QALYs, and has 96% probability of being cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,085. AAA contributes most to cost-effectiveness, followed by kidney cancer, but some cancer findings reduce cost-effectiveness. Screening is more cost-effective at younger ages. Screen-detectable disease prevalence, severity and mortality risk contribute most to uncertainty. Conclusions One-off upper abdominal CT screening is potentially cost-effective, but costs, harms and benefits vary between conditions. Cost-effectiveness is driven by early diagnosis of AAA, then kidney cancer, illustrating the importance of considering all relevant diseases in screening models. A larger trial would provide more robust data to refine the cost-effectiveness argument. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0500519