Notificações da Hepatite B no Estado da Bahia, Brasil

Introdução: A Hepatite B é um problema de saúde pública no Brasil por ser prevenível. Objetivou-se analisar as associações entre as características individuais, sóciodemográficas, os comportamentos de risco e os resultados de testes sorológicos com os casos de Hepatite B no estado da Bahia. Materiais e Métodos: Estudo epidemiológico de corte transversal exploratório. Todos os casos de VHB, notificados em 2014 no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN), foram analisados com testes estatísticos para verificar as associações entre as variáveis. Resultados: A prevalência do VHB, em relação às outras hepatites, foi de 32,6%, atingindo pessoas, principalmente, com média de 37+13,92 anos de idade. Apresentou associação estatisticamente significante com a Hepatite B: o sexo masculino, a escolaridade com ensino médio completo, todas as faixas etárias, vacinação incompleta e não vacinados, fonte de infecção sexual e vertical, exposição a múltiplos parceiros e drogas injetáveis e os testes sorológicos HBsAg, Anti-HBc IgM e Anti-HBc total. Conclusão: A hepatite B esteve associada a fatores individuais, sociodemográficos e comportamentos de risco entre a população estudada. Diante dos resultados percebe-se a necessidade de medidas de prevenção para o VHB, orientações acerca da doença e dos principais meios de infecção, diagnóstico precoce oportuno e a vacinação contra hepatite B em vários ambientes comunitários. É preciso capacitação dos profissionais de saúde para notificação adequada e completa, assim como a vigilância desta infecção para facilitar o planejamento de medidas adequadas de controle e prevenção

Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation

Domesticated species are impacted in unintended ways during domestication and breeding. Changes in the nature and intensity of selection impart genetic drift, reduce diversity, and increase the frequency of deleterious alleles. Such outcomes constrain our ability to expand the cultivation of crops into environments that differ from those under which domestication occurred. We address this need in chickpea, an important pulse legume, by harnessing the diversity of wild crop relatives. We document an extreme domestication-related genetic bottleneck and decipher the genetic history of wild populations. We provide evidence of ancestral adaptations for seed coat color crypsis, estimate the impact of environment on genetic structure and trait values, and demonstrate variation between wild and cultivated accessions for agronomic properties. A resource of genotyped, association mapping progeny functionally links the wild and cultivated gene pools and is an essential resource chickpea for improvement, while our methods inform collection of other wild crop progenitor species

Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer

This paper describes the development and feasibility of the Community Based Research Infrastructure to Better Science (CRIBS) training. The goal of this training program was to help new or existing community-academic teams to build strong partnerships and successfully develop together fundable research projects focused on breast cancer environmental causes and disparities. A comprehensive mixed-methods participatory approach was utilized to assess the training. Twenty-two community-academic teams applied for the training program; twelve teams were enrolled. All teams completed the training and subsequently submitted research applications for funding. All components of the training received high ratings and positive qualitative comments. Self-rated competency in all of the learning domains increased during the training. Four (33%) of teams were successful in their first attempt to garner research funding, and six (50%) were eventually successful. The evaluation of CRIBS found it to have successfully achieved all four goals of the training: (1) Twelve new CBPR (community-based participatory research) teams, (2) improved knowledge about CBPR and science, (3) twelve submitted grant proposals in the first year, and (4) six (50%) successfully funded research projects

IAPT chromosome data 33

Taxonomy: This study was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (ANPCyT) grant no. PICT-2017-4203 and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), and a postdoctoral fellowship from CONICET to AVR.Fil: Marhold, Karol. Slovak Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; Eslovaquia. Karlova Univerzita (cuni); República ChecaFil: Kucera, Jaromír. Slovak Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; EslovaquiaFil: Acuña, Carlos Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste; ArgentinaFil: Akopian, Janna A.. Armenian National Academy of Sciences; ArmeniaFil: de Almeida, Erton M.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil. Universidade Federal da Paraíba; BrasilFil: Alves, Marccus V.. Universidade Federal da Paraíba; BrasilFil: Amorim, Bruno. Museu da Amazônia; Brasil. Universidade do Estado do Amazona; BrasilFil: An'kova, Tatyana V.. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia; RusiaFil: Arora, Jaya. University of Delhi; IndiaFil: Aytaç, Zeki. Gazi Üniversitesi; TurquíaFil: Baez, Jesica Mariana. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Brasil. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research; Alemania. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Cavalcanti, Taciana Barbosa. Parque Estação Biológica; BrasilFil: Calvente, Alice. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; BrasilFil: Catalan, Pilar. Tomsk State University; Rusia. Universidad de Zaragoza; EspañaFil: Chernyagina, Olga A.. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia; RusiaFil: Chernysheva, Olga A.. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia; RusiaFil: Cordeiro, Joel M. P.. Universidade Estadual da Paraiba; BrasilFil: Daviña, Julio Rubén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Instituto de Biología Subtropical - Nodo Posadas | Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Instituto de Biología Subtropical - Nodo Posadas; ArgentinaFil: Deanna, Rocío. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Argentina. State University of Colorado at Boulder; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Delgado, Luis. Universidad de Salamanca; EspañaFil: Dias Silva, Yhanndra K.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Elliott, Tammy L.. University of Cape Town; Sudáfrica. University of Montreal; CanadáFil: Erst, Andrey S.. Tomsk State University; Rusia. Academia de Ciencias de Rusia; RusiaFil: Felix, Leonardo P.. Universidade Federal da Paraíba; BrasilFil: Forni Martins, Eliana R.. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilFil: Gallego, Francisca. Universidad de Salamanca; EspañaFil: Facco, Marlon Garlet. Universidade de Brasília; BrasilFil: Gianini Aquino, Analía Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Instituto de Biología Subtropical - Nodo Posadas | Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Instituto de Biología Subtropical. Instituto de Biología Subtropical - Nodo Posadas; ArgentinaFil: Gomes de Andrade, Maria J.. Universidade do Estado da Bahia; BrasilFil: Rua, Gabriel Hugo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Botánica Agrícola; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin

Data from: Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation

Domesticated species are impacted in unintended ways during domestication and breeding. Changes in the nature and intensity of selection impart genetic drift, reduce diversity, and increase the frequency of deleterious alleles. Such outcomes constrain our ability to expand the cultivation of crops into environments that differ from those under which domestication occurred. We address this need in chickpea, an important pulse legume, by harnessing the diversity of wild crop relatives. We document an extreme domestication-related genetic bottleneck and decipher the genetic history of wild populations. We provide evidence of ancestral adaptations for seed coat color crypsis, estimate the impact of environment on genetic structure and trait values, and demonstrate variation between wild and cultivated accessions for agronomic properties. A resource of genotyped, association mapping progeny functionally links the wild and cultivated gene pools and is an essential resource chickpea for improvement, while our methods inform collection of other wild crop progenitor species