National cost study versus hospital cost accounting for organ recovery cost assessment in a French hospital group

Abstract Background The choice of cost data sources is crucial, because it influences the results of cost studies, decisions of hospital managers and ultimately national directives of policy makers. The main objective of this study was to compare a hospital cost accounting system in a French hospital group and the national cost study (ENC) considering the cost of organ recovery procedures. The secondary objective was to compare these approaches to the weighting method used in the ENC to assess organ recovery costs. Methods The resources consumed during the hospital stay and organ recovery procedure were identified and quantified retrospectively from hospital discharge abstracts and the national discharge abstract database. Identified items were valued using hospital cost accounting, followed by 2010–2011 ENC data, and then weighted using 2010–2011 ENC data. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine whether at least two of the cost databases provided different results. Then, a Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the three cost databases. Results The costs assessed using hospital cost accounting differed significantly from those obtained using the ENC data (Mann–Whitney; P-value < 0.001). In the ENC, the mean costs for hospital stays and organ recovery procedures were determined to be €4961 (SD €7295) and €862 (SD €887), respectively, versus €12,074 (SD €6956) and €4311 (SD €1738) for the hospital cost accounting assessment. The use of a weighted methodology reduced the differences observed between these two data sources. Conclusions Readers, hospital managers and decision makers must know the strengths and weaknesses of each database to interpret the results in an informed context

Comparative impact on islet isolation and transplant outcome of the preservation solutions Institut Georges Lopez-1, University of Wisconsin, and Celsior

Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL-1) is a preservation solution similar to University of Wisconsin (UW) with reversed Na/K contents. In this study, we assessed the impact of IGL-1, UW, and Celsior (CS) solutions on islet isolation and transplant outcome

Influence of donor age on islet isolation and transplantation outcome.

International audienceBACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the age of human organ donors might influence islet isolation and transplantation outcome in a negative way due to a decrease of in vivo function in islets isolated from older donors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 332 islet isolations according to donor age. We determined isolation outcome by islet yields, transplantation rates, and [beta]-cell function in vitro. Transplanted patients were divided into two groups depending on donor age (n=25 and n=31 patients for 45-year-old donors, respectively). We assessed islet graft function by C-peptide/glucose ratio, [beta] score, secretory units of islets in transplantation index, and insulin independence rate at 1, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. RESULTS: There was no difference in islet yields between the two groups (251,900+/-14,100 and 244,600+/-8400 islet equivalent for 45-year-old donors, respectively). Transplantation rates and stimulation indices were similar in both groups as well. All islet graft function parameters were significantly higher at 1-month follow-up in patients who had received islets from younger donors. At 6-month follow-up after second or third injection and at 12-month follow-up, secretory units of islets in transplantation indices and C-peptide/glucose ratios were significantly higher in patients with donors aged 45 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, despite similar outcomes of the isolation procedure, islet graft function is significantly influenced by donor age. These results may have important consequences in the definition of pancreas allocation criteria

Additional file 1: of Mixed method versus full top-down microcosting for organ recovery cost assessment in a French hospital group

Supplemental digital content file. (DOCX 29 kb

Impact of anti-insulin antibodies on islet transplantation outcome: data from the GRAGIL Network

In patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin antibodies (IA), altering the pharmacokinetics of circulating insulin, might be associated with high glucose concentration, prolonged hypoglycemia, and higher insulin requirement. The impact of IA on islet transplantation has never been explored. Our aim was to evaluate islet transplantation results at 1 year according to the presence of IA

Impact of the Number of Infusions on 2-Year Results of Islet-After-Kidney Transplantation in the GRAGIL Network.

International audienceBACKGROUND.: Insulin independence after islet transplantation is generally achieved after multiple infusions. However, single infusion would increase the number of recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of islet-after-kidney transplantation according to the number of infusions. METHODS.: Islets were isolated at the Geneva University, shipped, and transplanted into French patients from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network, on the "Edmonton" immunosuppression protocol between 2004 and 2010. RESULTS.: Nineteen patients were transplanted with 33 preparations. Fifteen patients reached 24 months follow-up; eight subjects were single-graft recipients and seven were double-graft recipients. Finally, single-graft recipients received a median of 5312 islet equivalents/kg (5186-6388) vs. 10,564 (10,054-11,375) for double-graft recipients (P=0.0003) with similar islet mass at first infusion. Insulin independence was achieved in five of eight single-graft subjects (62.5%) versus five of seven in double-graft subjects (71.4%), not significant. Median insulin independence duration was 4.7 (3.1-15.2) months after one infusion vs. 19 (9.6-20.8) months after two infusions (not significant). At 24 months posttransplant, comparing single- with double-graft patients, insulin doses were 0.23 (0.11-0.34) U/kg vs. 0.02 (0.0-0.23) U/kg, P=0.11; HbA1c was 6.5% (5.9%-6.8%) vs. 6.2% (5.9%-6.3%), P=0.16; and basal C-peptide was 302 (143-480) pmol/L vs. 599 (393-806) pmol/L, P=0.05. Only 37.5% of single-graft patients had a β-score ≥4 compared with 100% of double-graft patients (P=0.03). Two recipients experienced postinfusion bleeding, and two patients (13%) showed renal dysfunction in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection. CONCLUSIONS.: One infusion achieves good glycemic control and sometimes insulin independence. However, double-graft patients remain insulin-free longer, tend to have lower HbA1c, and show better graft function 24 months after transplant

Ten-year outcomes of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes: Data from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network.

To describe the 10-year outcomes of islet transplantation within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network, in patients with type 1 diabetes experiencing high glucose variability associated with severe hypoglycemia and/or with functional kidney graft. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all subjects transplanted in the GRAGIL-1c and GARGIL-2 islet transplantation trials and analyzed components of metabolic control, graft function and safety outcomes over the 10-year period of follow-up. Forty-four patients were included between September 2003 and April 2010. Thirty-one patients completed a 10-year follow-up. Ten years after islet transplantation, median HbA1c was 7.2% (6.2-8.0) (55 mmol/mol [44-64]) versus 8.0% (7.1-9.1) (64 mmol/mol [54-76]) before transplantation (p &lt; .001). Seventeen of 23 (73.9%) recipients were free of severe hypoglycemia, 1/21 patients (4.8%) was insulin-independent and median C-peptide was 0.6 ng/ml (0.2-1.2). Insulin requirements (UI/kg/day) were 0.3 (0.1-0.5) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.6) before transplantation (p &lt; .001). Median (IQR) β-score was 1 (0-4) (p &lt; .05 when comparing with pre-transplantation values) and 51.9% recipients had a functional islet graft at 10 years. With a 10-year follow-up in a multicentric network, islet transplantation provided sustained improvement of glycemic control and was efficient to prevent severe hypoglycemia in almost 75% of the recipients