Risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with documented heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Prognostic factors for unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are largely unknown. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective, case-control study, all HIT patients were treated with danaparoid. Study cases were HIT patients with an unfavorable clinical outcome. Controls were HIT patients who were not study cases. Unfavorable clinical outcome was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following clinical events: death within 60 days after HIT start date, or venous or arterial thromboembolism, amputation, major bleeding, or disseminated intra-vascular coagulation between 48 hours and 60 days after HIT start date. RESULTS: Compared with controls (n=65), thrombotic episodes within 48 hours of HIT start date were more frequent (59.2% versus 32.3%; p=0.004), the median time between HIT start date and initiation of danaparoid infusion was longer (3.0 versus 1.0 days; p=0.001), and this treatment was more frequently underdosed (43.8% versus 18.8%; p=0.004) in study cases (n=49). Upon multivariate analysis, all these three parameters were significant predictive factors for unfavorable clinical outcome. The adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] were 6.6 [2.5-17.3] for time between HIT start date and danaparoid initiation over 48 hours, 4.3 [1.5-12.0] for danaparoid underdosing, and 3.2 [1.3-8.0] for presence of a thromboembolic episode at HIT start date. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the recommendations concerning the management of HIT patients, namely discontinuation of all heparin administration once the diagnosis is suspected and prompt initiation of an alternative anticoagulant drug with a strict adherence to doses specifically recommended for these patients

Human Fetal Cell Therapy in Huntington's Disease: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Human Fetal Cell Therapy in Huntington's Disease: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

International audienceBackground: Huntington s disease is a ' rare, severe, inherited neurodegenerative disease in which we assessed the safety and efficacy of grafting human fetal ganglionic eminence intrastriatally. Methods: Patients at the early stage of the di sease were enrolled in the Multicentric Intracerebral Grafting in Huntington's Disease trial, a delayed-start phase II randomized study. After a run-in period of 12 m onths, patients were randomized at month 12 to either the treatment group (transplanted at month 13-mo nth 14) or the control group and secondarily treated 20 months later (month 33-month 34). The primary outcome was total motor score compared between both groups 20 months postrandomization (month 32). Secondary outcomes i ncluded clinical, imaging, and electrophysiological findings and a comparison of pregraft and p ostgraft total motor score slopes durin g th e entire study period (month 0-month 52) regardless of the time of transplant. Results: Of 54 randomized patients, 45 were transplanted; 26 immediately (treatment) and 19 delayed (control). Mean total motor score at month 32 did not differ between groups (treated controls difference in means adjusted for M12: +2.9 [95% confidence interval, −2.8 to 8.6]; = 0.31). Its rate of decline after transplan-P tation was similar to that before transplantation. A total of 27 severe adverse events were recorded in the randomized patients, 10 of which were related to the transplant procedure. Improvement of procedures during the trial significantly decreased the frequency of surgical events.We found antihuman leucocytes antigen antibodies in 40% of the patients. Conclusion: No clinical benefit was found in this trial. This may have been related to graft rejection. Ectopia and high track number negatively influence the graft outcome. Procedural adjustments substantially improved surgical safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00190450

Clinical and genetic characteristics of late-onset Huntington's disease

Background: The frequency of late-onset Huntington's disease (>59 years) is assumed to be low and the clinical course milder. However, previous literature on late-onset disease is scarce and inconclusive. Objective: Our aim is to study clinical characteristics of late-onset compared to common-onset HD patients in a large cohort of HD patients from the Registry database. Methods: Participants with late- and common-onset (30–50 years)were compared for first clinical symptoms, disease progression, CAG repeat size and family history. Participants with a missing CAG repeat size, a repeat size of ≤35 or a UHDRS motor score of ≤5 were excluded. Results: Of 6007 eligible participants, 687 had late-onset (11.4%) and 3216 (53.5%) common-onset HD. Late-onset (n = 577) had significantly more gait and balance problems as first symptom compared to common-onset (n = 2408) (P <.001). Overall motor and cognitive performance (P <.001) were worse, however only disease motor progression was slower (coefficient, −0.58; SE 0.16; P <.001) compared to the common-onset group. Repeat size was significantly lower in the late-onset (n = 40.8; SD 1.6) compared to common-onset (n = 44.4; SD 2.8) (P <.001). Fewer late-onset patients (n = 451) had a positive family history compared to common-onset (n = 2940) (P <.001). Conclusions: Late-onset patients present more frequently with gait and balance problems as first symptom, and disease progression is not milder compared to common-onset HD patients apart from motor progression. The family history is likely to be negative, which might make diagnosing HD more difficult in this population. However, the balance and gait problems might be helpful in diagnosing HD in elderly patients