Characterization of Coastal Urban Watershed Bacterial Communities Leads to Alternative Community-Based Indicators

BACKGROUND: Microbial communities in aquatic environments are spatially and temporally dynamic due to environmental fluctuations and varied external input sources. A large percentage of the urban watersheds in the United States are affected by fecal pollution, including human pathogens, thus warranting comprehensive monitoring. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using a high-density microarray (PhyloChip), we examined water column bacterial community DNA extracted from two connecting urban watersheds, elucidating variable and stable bacterial subpopulations over a 3-day period and community composition profiles that were distinct to fecal and non-fecal sources. Two approaches were used for indication of fecal influence. The first approach utilized similarity of 503 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) common to all fecal samples analyzed in this study with the watershed samples as an index of fecal pollution. A majority of the 503 OTUs were found in the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. The second approach incorporated relative richness of 4 bacterial classes (Bacilli, Bacteroidetes, Clostridia and alpha-proteobacteria) found to have the highest variance in fecal and non-fecal samples. The ratio of these 4 classes (BBC:A) from the watershed samples demonstrated a trend where bacterial communities from gut and sewage sources had higher ratios than from sources not impacted by fecal material. This trend was also observed in the 124 bacterial communities from previously published and unpublished sequencing or PhyloChip- analyzed studies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provided a detailed characterization of bacterial community variability during dry weather across a 3-day period in two urban watersheds. The comparative analysis of watershed community composition resulted in alternative community-based indicators that could be useful for assessing ecosystem health

Breakthrough Adverse Reactions to Low-Osmolar Contrast Media After Steroid Premedication.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the nature of adverse reactions, or breakthrough reactions, experienced by patients who received steroid premedication and low-osmolar contrast media. We compared the demographics of patients having these breakthrough reactions with those of patients who did not develop these reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our radiology quality improvement database to identify patients with breakthrough reactions that occurred from January 1, 1994, through October 1, 1999, and we reviewed their medical records. We compared these patients with a control cohort of patients who had a history of prior adverse reaction to contrast media but no breakthrough reaction after administration of low-osmolar contrast media and premedication with corticosteroids. RESULTS: Over the 6-year period, 52 patients experienced 61 breakthrough reactions. The breakthrough reaction was mild in 76% of the patients. The breakthrough reaction was similar to the patient\u27s initial adverse reaction in 85% of the patients. A history of seafood allergy or hay fever was statistically more likely to be identified in the breakthrough group than the control group. CONCLUSION: Breakthrough reactions occur in a substantial number of patients despite premedication with steroids and use of low-osmolar contrast agents. Typically the breakthrough reaction is of similar severity to the patient\u27s initial reaction. Severe or life-threatening reactions are seen in 24% of patients