Groupe de thérapie par l’art graphique

Dans cet article, nous décrivons et commentons deux groupes de thérapie par l'art graphique. Est-il possible de réaliser un travail d'ordre psychothérapeutique dans de tels groupes? Nous tentons de répondre à cette question à partir d'exemples tirés du vécu de ces groupes différents. Nous expliquons d'abord comment fonctionnent ces derniers, de quelle façon nous y intervenons, l'évolution générale de ceux-ci et pour terminer, nous présentons de façon approfondie l'évolution d'un des participants.In this article we describe and comment upon two graphic art therapy groups. Is it possible to accomplish work of a psycho-therapeutic nature in such groups? We attempt to respond to this question using examples taken from the experience of these different groups. First, we explain how the groups operate, our method of intervention, the general evolution, and finally, we present, in an in-depth fashion, the progress of one of the participants

The Physical Internet and Business Model Innovation

Building on the analogy of data packets within the Digital Internet, the Physical Internet is a concept that dramatically transforms how physical objects are designed, manufactured, and distributed. This approach is open, efficient, and sustainable beyond traditional proprietary logistical solutions, which are often plagued by inefficiencies. The Physical Internet redefines supply chain configurations, business models, and value-creation patterns. Firms are bound to be less dependent on operational scale and scope trade-offs because they will be in a position to offer novel hybrid products and services that would otherwise destroy value. Finally, logistical chains become flexible and reconfigurable in real time, thus becoming better in tune with firm strategic choices. This article focuses on the potential impact of the Physical Internet on business model innovation, both from the perspectives of Physical-Internet enabled and enabling business models

Towards a standardized test for serodiagnosis of scedosporiosis

International audienc

Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas

Policies and research increasingly focus on the protection of ecosystem services (ESs) through priority-area conservation. Priority areas for ESs should be identified based on ES capacity and ES demand and account for the connections between areas of ES capacity and demand (flow) resulting in areas of unique demand-supply connections (flow zones). We tested ways to account for ES demand and flow zones to identify priority areas in the European Union. We mapped the capacity and demand of a global (carbon sequestration), a regional (flood regulation), and 3 local ESs (air quality, pollination, and urban leisure). We used Zonation software to identify priority areas for ESs based on 6 tests: with and without accounting for ES demand and 4 tests that accounted for the effect of ES flow zone. There was only 37.1% overlap between the 25% of priority areas that encompassed the most ESs with and without accounting for ES demand. The level of ESs maintained in the priority areas increased from 23.2% to 57.9% after accounting for ES demand, especially for ESs with a small flow zone. Accounting for flow zone had a small effect on the location of priority areas and level of ESs maintained but resulted in fewer flow zones without ES maintained relative to ignoring flow zones. Accounting for demand and flow zones enhanced representation and distribution of ESs with local to regional flow zones without large trade-offs relative to the global ES. We found that ignoring ES demand led to the identification of priority areas in remote regions where benefits from ES capacity to society were small. Incorporating ESs in conservation planning should therefore always account for ES demand to identify an effective priority network for ESs.Peer reviewe