8 research outputs found

    Plan de responsabilidad social empresarial Navitrans.

    Get PDF
    A continuación, se presenta el enlace del video que hace contextualización sobre Marketing Social y Marketing Corporativo e identificación del sector de la economía al cual pertenece la empresa Navitrans. Link video RSE vs. Marketing https://www.powtoon.com/online-presentation/fukfTSirMew/?mode=movie#/El presente trabajo consiste en Diseñar el plan de responsabilidad social empresarial para la empresa Navitrans, después de una serie de investigaciones y la orientación pertinente de directores y tutores del Diplomado De Profundización En Gerencia Estratégica Y Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, se logra realizar este a través de la evaluación de desempeño que ha tenido la empresa a nivel económico, social y ambiental, en el que mide su nivel de impacto y la prioridad de atención que se le debe dar. Para ello se justifica la importancia de la RSE y la implementación de un código de conducta en el que todos aportaron para su construcción y aprobación, teniendo como referencia el Modelo Benchmarking, en el que ofrece beneficios en los procesos. Los Stakeholder juegan un papel importante en el diseño del plan de responsabilidad social empresarial ya que nos ayudan a identificar a las personas, grupos u organizaciones, que pueden afectar positiva o negativamente según las actividades y decisiones de la empresa, analizando la matriz de relaciones (influencia vs Impacto) de los actores internos y externos con el fin de informar la situación presentada a los interesados. Lo anterior favoreció para la construcción del Plan De Responsabilidad Social Empresarial de Navitrans S.A.S, el cual aportará a su eficiencia, sostenibilidad y transparencia; adoptando políticas organizacionales que propicien y fomenten el balance económico, social y ambiental; atrayendo nuevos clientes y futuros socios que desarrollan oportunidades sociales de negocio.The current work consists of designing the responsibility plan for social work for the Navitrans business, after a series of investigations and the pertinent investigation of the directors and tutors of the diploma of deepening in strategic management and corporate social responsability it will be carried out through the evaluation of the economic, social and environmental performance company has had in that we measure the level of impact and the priority of attention that should be given. It justifies the importance of the RSE and the implementation of a code of conduct in that all contributed to its construction and approval having as a reference the Benchmarking Model in that it offers benefits in the processes. The Stakeholders plays an important part in the responsibility plan for social work since it helps identify the people groups or organizations that can affect positively or negatively according to the activities and decisions of the business, analyzing the matrix of relationships (influence vs impact) of the internal and external actors with an end to inform the presented situation to those interested. The anterior favored for the construction of the responsibility plan for social work of Navitrans S.A.S. Which contributes to its efficiency, sustainability and transparency; adapting organizational politics that create a suitable atmosphere for and promote the economic, social and environmental balance; attracting new clients and future partners that bring social opportunities to the business

    Fortalecimiento del sentido de pertenencia en los colaboradores de la compañía Refinadora Nacional de Aceites y Grasas S.A a través de la aplicación de técnicas experienciales.

    No full text
    En la actualidad, es posible reconocer que a las organizaciones no solo les genera valor la producción, finanzas, tecnología o los recursos materiales sino también las personas que las integran (Rodríguez y Romo, 2013). En consecuencia, el talento humano que conforma la organización se considera parte importante de las fortalezas de la compañía, para la consecución de sus objetivos. Sin embargo, es una labor difícil encontrar personas que cuenten con el perfil profesional acorde al cargo y, que además sus intereses vayan en el mismo sentido con los objetivos de la empresa. Por esta razón, es importante que las organizaciones se encuentren interesadas en desarrollar en su equipo de trabajo, el sentido de pertenencia, con la intención de que este valor influya directamente en la motivación de los colaboradores y en la manera cómo perciben su rol en la organización (Rodríguez & Romo, 2013). Hagerty, Lynch-Sauer, Patusky, Bouwsema y Collier (1992) identifican como elementos esenciales para desarrollar el sentido de pertenencia la experiencia de sentirse valorado, necesitado y aceptado por otras personas, grupos o entornos; y la percepción por parte del sujeto de que sus características son similares o complementan a las de las personas que pertenecen al sistema, es decir, la experiencia de sentir que se ajusta o de ser congruente con otras personas, grupos o entornos a través de características compartidas o complementarias.Introducción. -- 1.Caracterización de la organización. -- 1.1.Nombre de la empresa. -- 1.2.Tipo de organización. -- 1.3.Ubicación. -- 1.4.Logo. -- 1.5.Misión. -- 1.6.Visión. -- 1.7.Valores. -- 1.7.1.Compromiso. -- 1.7.2.Trabajo en equipo. -- 1.7.3.Respeto. -- 1.7.4.Sostenibilidad. -- 1.7.5.Transparencia. -- 1.7.6.Competitividad. -- 1.7.7.Lealtad. -- 1.8.Caracterización de la población. -- 2.Justificación. -- 3.Planteamiento del problema. -- 3.1.Pregunta problema. -- 3.2.Arbol de problemas. -- 4.Antecedentes. -- 5.Marco teórico. -- 6.Marco conceptual. -- 27 7.Objetivos. -- 7.1.Objetivo general. -- 7.2.Objetivos específicos. -- 8.Propuesta de técnica grupal. -- 8.1.La feria de los valores. -- 8.1.1.Primer día. -- 8.1.2.Segundo día. -- 8.1.3.Tercer día. -- 8.1.4.Cuarto día. -- 8.1.5.Quinto día. -- 8.1.6.Sexto día. -- 9.Técnica de observación de la intervención grupal. -- 10.Aspectos éticos. -- 11.Conclusiones. -- Anexos. -- [email protected]@campusucc.edu.coisabella.cifuentesv@[email protected]@[email protected]

    Primer Encuentro Internacional de Experiencias de Investigación en Ciencias Administrativas

    No full text
    Este evento de investigación organizado por la Escuela de Administración de la Universidad del Rosario surgió como una iniciativa para fomentar la investigación formativa en áreas administrativas. El evento, al que asistieron 165 participantes, contó con dos conferencias centrales, 30 ponencias presentadas en 8 simposios y 7 posters. La participación de distintas universidades permitió un intercambio académico muy importante y formativo para los ponentes y asistentes en general, promoviendo el interés por la investigación en el campo de la administración, el cual fue el interés central de este encuentro. Este encuentro recibió el apoyo de las directivas de la Universidad del Rosario, la Señora vicerrectora Stephanie Lavaux, el Señor Decano de la Escuela de Administración, Dr. Alejandro Cheyne, ACBSP (Accreditation Council for Business Schools & Programs) y Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración (ASCOLFA)

    Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care patient (The ENPIC study) : Does nutrition really affect ICU mortality?

    No full text
    The importance of artificial nutritional therapy is underrecognized, typically being considered an adjunctive rather than a primary therapy. We aimed to evaluate the influence of nutritional therapy on mortality in critically ill patients. Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study included adult patients needing artificial nutritional therapy for >48 h if they stayed in one of 38 participating intensive care units for ≥72 h between April and July 2018. Demographic data, comorbidities, diagnoses, nutritional status and therapy (type and details for ≤14 days), and outcomes were registered in a database. Confounders such as disease severity, patient type (e.g., medical, surgical or trauma), and type and duration of nutritional therapy were also included in a multivariate analysis, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were reported. We included 639 patients among whom 448 (70.1%) and 191 (29.9%) received enteral and parenteral nutrition, respectively. Mortality was 25.6%, with non-survivors having the following characteristics: older age; more comorbidities; higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (6.6 ± 3.3 vs 8.4 ± 3.7; P < 0.001); greater nutritional risk (Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill [NUTRIC] score: 3.8 ± 2.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.7; P < 0.001); more vasopressor requirements (70.4% vs 83.5%; P=0.001); and more renal replacement therapy (12.2% vs 23.2%; P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (HR: 1.023; 95% CI: 1.008-1.038; P=0.003), higher SOFA score (HR: 1.096; 95% CI: 1.036-1.160; P=0.001), higher NUTRIC score (HR: 1.136; 95% CI: 1.025-1.259; P=0.015), requiring parenteral nutrition after starting enteral nutrition (HR: 2.368; 95% CI: 1.168-4.798; P=0.017), and a higher mean Kcal/Kg/day intake (HR: 1.057; 95% CI: 1.015-1.101; P=0.008) were associated with mortality. By contrast, a higher mean protein intake protected against mortality (HR: 0.507; 95% CI: 0.263-0.977; P=0.042). Old age, higher organ failure scores, and greater nutritional risk appear to be associated with higher mortality. Patients who need parenteral nutrition after starting enteral nutrition may represent a high-risk subgroup for mortality due to illness severity and problems receiving appropriate nutritional therapy. Mean calorie and protein delivery also appeared to influence outcomes. ClinicaTrials.gov NCT: 03634943

    The risk of COVID-19 death is much greater and age dependent with type I IFN autoantibodies

    No full text
    International audienceSignificance There is growing evidence that preexisting autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons (IFNs) are strong determinants of life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. It is important to estimate their quantitative impact on COVID-19 mortality upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, by age and sex, as both the prevalence of these autoantibodies and the risk of COVID-19 death increase with age and are higher in men. Using an unvaccinated sample of 1,261 deceased patients and 34,159 individuals from the general population, we found that autoantibodies against type I IFNs strongly increased the SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate at all ages, in both men and women. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs are strong and common predictors of life-threatening COVID-19. Testing for these autoantibodies should be considered in the general population

    The risk of COVID-19 death is much greater and age dependent with type I IFN autoantibodies

    No full text
    International audienceSignificance There is growing evidence that preexisting autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons (IFNs) are strong determinants of life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. It is important to estimate their quantitative impact on COVID-19 mortality upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, by age and sex, as both the prevalence of these autoantibodies and the risk of COVID-19 death increase with age and are higher in men. Using an unvaccinated sample of 1,261 deceased patients and 34,159 individuals from the general population, we found that autoantibodies against type I IFNs strongly increased the SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate at all ages, in both men and women. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs are strong and common predictors of life-threatening COVID-19. Testing for these autoantibodies should be considered in the general population

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    No full text
    In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field
    corecore