Reflective Practice About Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy in Comparison to Open Surgery for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children Less Than 1 Year of Age

Introduction: The interest in laparoscopy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children under 12 months of age remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and benefits of retroperitoneal laparoscopy (RL) compared to open surgery in this age group.Materials and Methods: Between January 2012 and May 2017, we performed 222 pyeloplasties: 144 by laparoscopy and 78 by open surgery. From 2012, the choice of operative technique was decided according to the laparoscopic experience of the surgeon; two surgeons operated laparoscopically on all children <12 months of age, while others operated using posterior lumbotomy (PL). The RL is standardized and performed by 3 trocars (5, 3, 3). Pre, per and postoperative parameters were analyzed retrospectively. Statistical tests: Pearson, Fisher, Student and Mann-Whitney.Results: During this 5-year period, 24 RL and 53 PL were included with a median follow-up of 27 months (5–63). In the LR group, postoperative drainage was performed by JJ (13 cases) and external stent (11 cases). No conversion has been listed in this group. In each group there was one failure that needed redo pyeloplasty. Duration of hospitalization and intravenous acetaminophen use were significantly lower in the RL group (2.8 vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.02, respectively) while operating time was significantly longer (163 vs. 85.8 min, p = 0.001). The postoperative complication rate was statistically identical in each group (urinary tract infection, wall hematoma, hematuria…).Conclusion: RL is feasible in children under 1 year of age in the hands of well-experienced surgeons with longer operative time but without added morbidity. Subject to the retrospective nature of our study, the RL seems to offer a benefit regarding duration of hospitalization and analgesics consumption

Evaluation of the efficacy of a self-training programme in focus cardiac ultrasound with simulator

International audienc

Safeguarding continuing cardiovascular research excellence and quality publications in France: A working document from the French Society of Cardiology

International audienceBackground : France has a long history of successful cardiovascular research and scientific innovations, but its continued success cannot be taken for granted.Aims : To identify current obstacles to cardiovascular research in France and to crystallize the analysis into recommendations for maintained and enhanced research excellence in the future.Methods : The French Society of Cardiology set up seven Working Groups, each comprising four to eight cardiologists, covering a spectrum of research institutes, hospitals, specialties, ages and research experience. The Working Groups met regularly in person or by conference call to analyse experiences, refine situation assessments and formulate recommendations for improvements. Results and suggestions were presented to a Core Team, which worked to synthesize, prioritize and organize the findings into a consolidated situation assessment and generate a set of action-orientated recommendations.Results : Four key areas of action were identified: stronger focus on the generation of high-quality data; facilitation of future cardiovascular research; greater promotion and support for research among young cardiologists; and increased focus and support for communications. Most recommendations targeted structural shortcomings and may be implemented at low additional financial cost.Conclusions : It is possible to maintain, and even increase, the quality of cardiovascular research in France and to boost the conversion of successful projects into high-impact publications, without major increases in funding. Intense collaboration between specialties and organizations is necessary to achieve sustainable results

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation

The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of the use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) during autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Sixty PICCs were inserted in 57 patients (23 females and 34 males; mean age 48, range 19-68\ua0years) and remained in place for an overall period of 1,276\ua0days. All PICCs were positioned by a team of specifically trained physicians and nurses and utilized by specifically trained nurses of our hematology unit. No major insertion-related complications were observed; the only complication during insertion was one local hematoma (1.6\ua0%) due to accidental arterial puncture. Late complications were accidental catheter removal (5\ua0%, 2.3 per 1,000 PICC days), symptomatic catheter-related venous thrombosis (5\ua0%, 2.3 per 1,000 PICC days), and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI; 3.3\ua0%, 1.5 CRBSI per 1,000 PICC days). The reasons for catheter removal were completion of therapy (42 patients, 70\ua0%), fever of unknown origin (9 patients, 15\ua0%), catheter-related thrombosis (2 patients, 3.3\ua0%), CRBSI (2 patients, 3.3\ua0%), accidental removal (3 patients, 5\ua0%), lumen occlusion (1 patient, 1.6\ua0%), positive culture from peripheral blood (1 patient, 1.6\ua0%), and death (1 patient, 1.6\ua0%). Our data suggest that PICCs are a safe and effective alternative to conventional central venous catheters even in patients particularly prone to infective and hemorrhagic complications such as patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation

Cardiovascular Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients with COVID-19

International audienceAlthough 18–45-year-old (y-o) patients represent a significant proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, data concerning the young population remain scarce. The Critical COVID France (CCF) study was an observational study including consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 24 centers between 26 February and 20 April 2020. The primary composite outcome included transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) complications. Among 2868 patients, 321 (11.2%) patients were in the 18–45-y-o range. In comparison with older patients, young patients were more likely to have class 2 obesity and less likely to have hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in 18–45-y-o patients in comparison with patients > 45 years old (y/o) (16.8% vs. 30.7%, p 45 y/o. Acute heart failure occurred less frequently in 18–45-y-o patients (0.9% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001), while thrombotic complications were similar in young and older patients. Whereas both transfer to the ICU and in-hospital death occurred less frequently in young patients, COVID-19 seemed to have a particular CV impact in this population

Association of diabetes and outcomes in patients with COVID-19: Propensity score-matched analyses from a French retrospective cohort

International audienceBackground: Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with and without diabetes admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods: This retrospective multicentre cohort study comprised 24 tertiary medical centres in France, and included 2851 patients (675 with diabetes) hospitalized for COVID-19 between 26 February and 20 April 2020. A propensity score-matching (PSM) method (1:1 matching including patients' characteristics, medical history, vital statistics and laboratory results) was used to compare patients with and without diabetes (n = 603 per group). The primary outcome was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or in-hospital death.Results: After PSM, all baseline characteristics were well balanced between those with and without diabetes: mean age was 71.2 years; 61.8% were male; and mean BMI was 29 kg/m2. A history of cardiovascular, chronic kidney and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases were found in 32.8%, 22.1% and 6.4% of participants, respectively. The risk of experiencing the primary outcome was similar in patients with or without diabetes [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-1.41; P = 0.14], and was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.97-1.69) for in-hospital death, 1.26 (95% CI: 0.9-1.72) for death with no transfer to an ICU and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.88-1.47) with transfer to an ICU.Conclusion: In this retrospective study cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, diabetes was not significantly associated with a higher risk of severe outcomes after PSM.Trial registration number: NCT04344327

From splitting GLUT1 deficiency syndromes to overlapping phenotypes.

International audienceIntroduction Glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome (GLUT1DS) is a rare genetic disorder due to mutations or deletions in SLC2A1, resulting in impaired glucose uptake through the blood brain barrier. The classic phenotype includes pharmacoresistant epilepsy, intellectual deficiency, microcephaly and complex movement disorders, with hypoglycorrhachia, but milder phenotypes have been described (carbohydrate-responsive phenotype, dystonia and ataxia without epilepsy, paroxysmal exertion-induced dystonia). The aim of our study was to provide a comprehensive overview of GLUT1DS in a French cohort. Methods 265 patients were referred to the French national laboratory for molecular screening between July 2006 and January 2012. Mutations in SLC2A1 were detected in 58 patients, with detailed clinical data available in 24, including clinical features with a focus on their epileptic pattern and electroencephalographic findings, biochemical findings and neuroimaging findings. Results 53 point mutations and 5 deletions in SLC2A1 were identified. Most patients (87.5%) exhibited classic phenotype with intellectual deficiency (41.7%), epilepsy (75%) or movement disorder (29%) as initial symptoms at a medium age of 7.5 months, but diagnostic was delayed in most cases (median age at diagnostic 8 years 5 months). Sensitivity to fasting or exertion in combination with those 3 main symptoms were the main differences between mutated and negative patients (p < 0.001). Patients with myoclonic seizures (52%) evolved with more severe intellectual deficiency and movement disorders compared with those with Early Onset Absence Epilepsy (38%). Three patients evolved from a classic phenotype during early childhood to a movement disorder predominant phenotype at a late childhood/adulthood. Conclusions Our data confirm that the classic phenotype is the most frequent in GLUT1DS. Myoclonic seizures are a distinctive feature of severe forms. However a great variability among patients and overlapping through life from milder classic phenotype to paroxysmal-prominent- movement-disorder phenotype are possible, thus making it difficult to identify definite genotype–phenotype correlations